JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR : Specifications and Opinions

Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR

The Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR is a tele lens for MF, manufactured from 2017. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2800 €;

16 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Fujifilm GF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless medium format Fuji.

Specifications
Focal lenght	110 mm
Angle of view	28.1° (equivalent to a 87mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	MF
Max. aperture	f/2
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	14 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	0.90 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.16x
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1010 g
Dimensions	94 x 126 mm
Buy
Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 257000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Garciamarquez

sent on March 17, 2025

Pros: Image quality

Cons: weight and overall dimensions

Opinion: Used to 35 and 75mm on full frame, when I switched to GFX100s I took 45 f2.8 and 110mm f2 (roughly equivalent to an 85/90mm). The yield is simply excellent. Usually I close at least at f4 to have an adequate depth of field, but already at full aperture it is perfect. Uniques and flaws: it is very, very big and heavy. I envy Hasselblad a lens like the 90mm f2.5: shorter and a little darker, but much more compact and lighter: until Fuji offers a lighter and more compact 75mm equivalent, the 110 remains unfortunately irreplaceable for me.

Ferorake

sent on November 09, 2022

Pros: Optically gorgeous, granite construction

Cons: Hood too large and ambiguous feeling

Opinion: What can I say, it is a lens for naked and raw portraitists, it occurs to me to compare it to the old 85 1.2 of Canon: you make portraits and stop. In the hands of a professional can give paintings and money, in the hands of an "enthusiast" can quickly turn into a nightmare (I slip in the middle). The dimensions are exaggerated for any use that is not professional, so forget about using it as an 85 that you keep in your handbag to make the portrait to the cat if necessary. The autofocus is LM so quite fast but probably the camera bodies castrate the already few capabilities of this lens, and unless you have the gfx100\\100s (which I doubt you would carry with you for anything else that are not well-paid jobs), we are talking about a real sloth. The price is then in line with other recent professional portrait lenses of Canon, so I do not demonize it, around € 3000 Fuji Italy, but probably about € 2600 at the "street price". Although I took it at 1800€ from the usual Dutch site that when Fuji does cashback goes crazy, I resold it and I do not miss it. Optically it gave me the impression of being a "refined" 85 Art, with the same sharpness and creaminess, but with tonal passages and progression of the blur much more beautiful, a la Canon. A perfect combination between an "artistic" lens and a "precise" lens. The dream of every portraitist? Probably yes, and as mentioned at the beginning, in the right hands it is a weapon to carry paintings and money. However, I do not see it in the hands of an enthusiast, who can have fun with many other lenses with a much lower cost, juggling the monumental GFX sensor with the lenses he prefers.

Jacopoxx13

sent on July 23, 2022

Pros: Sharpness even at TA, quality, fantastic bokeh

Cons: price and weight (but if you go on a medium fomato are 2 factors to take into account)

Opinion: Fantastic lens, mainly used for portrait, returns excellent sharpness and a beautiful blur, once you try the portrait lenses in the FF they become difficult to shoot in hand. The lens is not stabilized so eye with the first version of GFX50 especially on low times, for the new stabilized series no problem, at TA there is a bit of vignetting but personally I do not consider it a defect indeed. To be taken into account especially with the GFX50 first and second series (GFX50II) having only contrast MAF sensors on particularly moving subjects becomes more difficult to focus. The optics are certainly challenging from the point of view of the weight 1 kilo, but certainly for those who select this system is not a problem.

Jonasalsgard

sent on April 12, 2021

Pros: Very bright, very good optical quality, focal well usable in portraiture.

Cons: Slow and inaccurate autofocus with the GFX 50R, even with static subjects; much better with the GFX 100, but it still goes into crisis as soon as the brightness drops and the subject moves a bit. Ghost Images very evident in certain situations. Certainly the fact of being built with as many as 14 elements in 9 groups, despite being a fixed focal lens and not a zoom, does not help. The only thing you can do is move the device to try to move the stain to an area that you can then cut or correct more easily. The rotation of the focus ring does not directly control the mechanical displacement of the lens elements, but is a digital command, so much so that the targetses do not show a metric scale. You can set the focus in linear or nonlinear mode, rotating clockwise or counterclockwise, but in fact there is too much to turn, it has nothing to do with a classic lens. Except when using the device on tripods with static subject, manual focus is not a great alternative to autofocus, even for those who were used to manually focusing medium-format devices in event photographs, such as weddings. With subjects in constant motion or when you don't have useful references to set the early focus, you are in great difficulty, even trying to use the digital rangefinder in the viewfinder, if you have set it, because there is too much to rotate and in fact you have no reference to the position of the ring.

Opinion: With this lens I got images that I really like. At full aperture, F2, it is a soft hair and, in portraiture, the vignetting is negligible. Using the F2.8 lens for a half-figure portrait, the bottom is completely blurry, although it is only one meter from the subject, which is ideal even in relatively narrow spaces. To be used wisely, because especially 100MP do not forgive, they give you everything back: merits and defects, wise or random choices. Even a slight blur compromises the usability of the image. Most often with female subjects I use a filter to soften the image, while with male subjects I use it as it is. Obviously I also work in post production, but in the shooting phase I already try to optimize the images by taking great care of the lights, the exposure and possibly using filters to soften, so that when I show the shots on the monitor people can already have a vague idea of what will be the final result and not be afraid for the resolution often exaggerated in portraits. Warning: Filters that soften images can affect autofocus, making it even unusable. We need to study the situation well, bearing in mind how the autofocus of the device you intend to use works and the different types of filters that help to soften the images. As for the focus, with the GFX 50R it was quite slow and inaccurate, especially with not particularly intense light. With the GFX 100 it is discreetly fast and precise to shoot relatively firm subjects, but loses many shots as soon as there is some action and the light intensity drops. Especially caution when using filters to soften images. The GFX system is designed to use curtain shutters and not mounted central shutters. This promotes the brightness of the lims and contains the costs, but due to a synchro time of 1/125 it places limits in outdoor flash photography with daylight and also in the studio with pilot lamps that produce a color temperature different from those of flash tubes. The GF 110 lens can help produce high-quality images. Very suitable for portraiture. The fundamental question is upstream: is the GFX system suitable for the subjects to be resumed and the scope of work?

Frank_pb

sent on November 23, 2017

Pros: Open f2.0, excellent sharpness even at TA, fantastic bokeh, three-dimensional, 77mm filters (easy to find), acceptable weight and dimensions for a mf

Cons: There is no stabilizer (present on the 120 f4.0 Macro), minimum distance of maf, high cost.

Opinion: I got this jewel for a whole week-end, of course with the GFX 50s camera. If you want to use it with open diaphragms, and at short distances you have to pay close attention to the focus, so the pdc is really reduced, the results are, in my opinion, excellent, superior to my opinion any combination of FF / fixed lens . rnIt is not only the sharpness, but excellent, the main parameter of evaluation; here comes into play a "different" impact, difficult to explain in words. There is a three-dimensional feel of soft and gradual transition from the focus plane, which I have not yet found in other images obtained with high-level cmq combinations (Eos 5d MK4 + 85 1,4 Art) that I used in direct comparison with the ML Fuji. rnIt is very high but not aggressive, this is the definition that best suits my feelings. It would be interesting to have a direct comparison with the Nikon D850 + (85 1,4 G ..?) .. to see how much is% 3B able to compete .. rnIn the "Portrait and Fashion" gallery you can find some images entitled "Ludovica" rn

Photos taken with Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR

Sofia

by Marckus Milo
13 comments, 10572 views

HI RES 12.8 MP

Gaia Bombarda

by Lucaradici
31 comments, 9230 views

HI RES 5.6 MP

by Maserc
31 comments, 9773 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Nikla_2

by Digital-photo
16 comments, 13671 views

HI RES 46.0 MP

Caroline.

by DidFromMars
15 comments, 7100 views

HI RES 12.8 MP

Sbirulino - Venice 2025

by Andrea Frassinetti
37 comments, 2534 views

HI RES 18.4 MP

Christina Fiorello

by Lucaradici
13 comments, 7406 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Pamela

by Vincenzo De Santis
23 comments, 4319 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

by Maserc
10 comments, 8847 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

by Maserc
12 comments, 6534 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

by Maserc
12 comments, 4155 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

Venice 2025

by Andrea Frassinetti
20 comments, 1769 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

by Maserc
12 comments, 5904 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

by Maserc
19 comments, 3581 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Christina Fiorello

by Lucaradici
9 comments, 6239 views

Venice 2024

by Andrea Frassinetti
14 comments, 2659 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Sarah.

by DidFromMars
8 comments, 3152 views

HI RES 51.1 MP

Isabella

by Riccardo Tempesti
13 comments, 6767 views

HI RES 30.5 MP

Untitled Photo

by Claudio Molinari
10 comments, 3370 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Calm Beauty

by Andreafacco
9 comments, 1694 views

Jade

by Roccia
8 comments, 7961 views

HI RES 51.1 MP

03062025_DSF4631-BN

by Massimo Passalacqua
14 comments, 813 views

Look

by Andreafacco
9 comments, 2419 views

HI RES 101.8 MP

Selma

by Andrea Frassinetti
8 comments, 2593 views

HI RES 18.4 MP

Venice 2025

by Andrea Frassinetti
19 comments, 810 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

by Vincenzoweb
9 comments, 1211 views

HI RES 61.5 MP

Untitled Photo

by Claudio Molinari
15 comments, 4923 views

HI RES 33.3 MP

Venice 2025

by Andrea Frassinetti
16 comments, 1130 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Anna

by Dmerante
8 comments, 2720 views

HI RES 21.3 MP

Venice 2025

by Andrea Frassinetti
9 comments, 765 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Selma

by Andrea Frassinetti
11 comments, 2097 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Valerio Tagliabue
13 comments, 1279 views

HI RES 51.1 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Venice 2025

by Andrea Frassinetti
6 comments, 1661 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Claudio Molinari
9 comments, 2651 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Marika Vip

by Diacharlie
14 comments, 554 views

HI RES 14.7 MP

Sam

by Vincenzoweb
6 comments, 1437 views

HI RES 90.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by Andrea Frassinetti
9 comments, 1029 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Fujifilm » Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR

Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Fujifilm GF 110mm f/2 R LM WR