JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EOS R7 : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EOS R7 is a mirrorless camera with APS-C (1.6x) sensor and 32.3 megapixels manufactured from 2022. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 51200 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 30 FPS x 93 RAW, 126 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1372 €;

111 users have given it an average vote of 8.6 out of 10

Sensor
Format	APS-C, 22.3 x 15 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.6x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	32.3 megapixel (pixel pitch 3.20 μm)
Sensor type	CMOS (sensor readout: 1/35)
ISO sensitivities	100 - 51200
File formats	JPEG, RAW
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/16000
Exp. compensation	+/- 3 stops at 1/3 steps
Exp. modes	M, S, A, P, Scena
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Canon RF (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	Yes
Continuos shooting (with autofocus)	30 FPS x 93 RAW, 126 JPEG
Pre-Burst	Yes
Live View	Yes
Video mode	4K (3840x2160p) @ 30 FPS
WiFi	Yes
GPS	No
USB	USB-C (3.2 2x2)
USB Charging	Yes
Computing Features
ND Long Exposure	No
Pixel Shift	No
Focus Stacking	Yes, in-camera
Startrail/Composite mode	No
Astrotracer	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	Yes
LCD	3.0″, 1.62 Mdots, 900 x 600 pixels, fully articulating
Viewfinder	Electronic, coverage 100%, 1.15x
Viewfinder resolution	1024 x 768 px
Flash	No
Storage	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II)
Storage, Slot 2	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II)
Shutter	Mechanical and electronic
Battery	Canon LP-E6NH, 15.33 Wh
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	612 g
Dimensions	132 x 90 x 92 mm
Buy
Canon EOS R7, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Nhtbzk

sent on May 12, 2023

Pros: 32.5mp, auto focus, detail,

Cons: vizör, rolling shutter, buffer

Opinion: I wish the reading speed, viewfinder resolution and buffer were higher. Then, considering its price, it is a mirrorless camera that we can say almost flawlessly. Despite these shortcomings, I am satisfied. The details and iso performance in the photos I took are sufficient for me. An affordable option, especially for wildlife photographers. I think it's a camera in front of its current alternatives.

Dr_kolew

sent on June 26, 2022

Pros: iso,speed,ibis,video,2 sd slot,

Cons: Af , af very bad with rf 35mm f1.8,rf 50mm f1.8, 50mm f1.4 usm, sigma 50mm f1.4hsm,and many more

Opinion: we need all of us who have been deceived by Canon to write to them and publicly announce everywhere that they sold us a half product, a device for which they have no lenses, and their other lenses do not work well with these r7 teles. my experience so far is this: Canon r7 works 99% perfectly with sigma 18-35 f1.8, 85% with canon ef 100mm f2.0, 90% with rf 16mm f2.8, 80% with canon 55-250 is, 70% with sigma 100-300 f4 .0 hsm, 95% sigma art 85mm f1.4. 80% with 10-18 stm and there is a problem in the mismatch of stabilization in the body and in the lens. I consider the Canon r7 not functional with the following lenses: canon rf 35mm f1.8, rf 50mm f1.8, sigma ef 50mm f1.4 usm, canon ef 50mm f1.4 usm canon 15-85 usm is

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Pgatto

sent on June 03, 2025

Pros: Mah...

Cons: Too many to be a top of the range, even if Aps-c.

Opinion: After almost 3 years and over 100000 shots I sold it and I don't miss it... The "unfinished" (I call it such) that on paper should have replaced the 7D2, honestly, was a disappointment. Having been forced 3 years ago to replace a 7D2 whose repair would have cost too much for a camera with almost 200,000 shots to its credit and having already R6 that had worthily replaced 5D4, I could only take an R7 (in Canon then there were no alternatives...), the premises on paper were all in its favor for those like me who should have used it for sport, electronic shutter, burst, maf, in short, I should have improved the quality of my shots which translated meant working better in less time, etc. Nothing could be further from the truth, or better: if you used it as I used the Reflex then, mechanical shutter/1 electronic curtain, outdoors (then I'll explain why) in fact maf and iso hold were better (and fortunately...) but wanting to use the "advantages" of an ML, the problems begin and I dwell only on those that – as soon as I found a valid alternative – led me to sell it without regrets, but there are others already said by those who preceded me. Electronic shutter unusable in sports (football/basketball/volleyball balls that look like rugby balls as well as arms/legs of athletes that look bionic, given the unacceptable rolling shutter) as well as it is unusable in closed places illuminated by LEDs, due to excessive banding... But if for sport - patience for the burst ... - you can always use the mechanic / 1TE, in theaters / churches this is unusable because it makes more noise than a submachine gun ... Not to mention the buffer, ridiculous, especially if, for example, in birdlife you wanted to take advantage of pre-shot and similar features! So, if I change a 7D2 with an R7 to use the R7 as I used the 7D2, I might as well save a lot of money and take another 7D2, a single stop of iso and the more performing autofocus absolutely do not justify the change. Finally, after a few months ago – also shooting in the theater and not being able to use it for the reasons mentioned above – I added an R8 to the R6, out of curiosity I wanted to try the latter also in the field of sports / birdlife and it turned out to be superior to the R7 in everything, especially in what should be the primary field of use of R7 - sport and birdlife - even with teleconverter mounted... of course someone will say, compare a FF with an Aps-c... I would say that I compare 2 cameras with a similar price, one top of the range even if Aps-c and the other entry level and since in the end, in photography, what matters (at least for me) is the result, I sold R7 and I kept R6 and R8, without regrets. I have been using Canon since digital existed, I have had among others 5D2, 5D4, 6D, 6D2, 7D, 7D2, R6, R7 and R8 and I can say with certainty that the R7, of all, is the worst success, precisely the unfinished ...

Fobya71

sent on May 15, 2025

Pros: On paper many compared to my 7D2

Cons: In reality, many features are simply not as they are portrayed

Opinion: For me it was the first ML, I sell from 7D2 and 5DSR that I still have and that I still use. I'm talking about the photo part, because I don't make videos and frankly if I wanted to make videos I would use a video camera. I note that I used EF lenses with adapter: 100-400 mKII, 24-70 2.8, 100 macro 2.8 and an old 500 F. R7 had been indicated as a replacement (at least as a intended use) of the legendary and widely used 7D mark II. Frankly, it seems to me more like a replacement for a 70D or 80D. Shooting framerates that gave me the impression of not being the ones declared. I don't know what the cause is, but sometimes they seemed to be slower than on my 7D2... Obviously there is the well-known problem of rolling shutter which in fact affects the possibility of using the maximum shooting FPS with electronic shutter: If you declare a function, it must not have limitations. Frankly ridiculous image buffer, considering the theoretical acquisition frequency. 93 images are nothing when Nikon's competition guarantees a thousand. For some reason, the lens stabilizer remains active all the time. On my DSLRs it disables after a few seconds of releasing the shutter button the last time. I don't understand why on R7 they keep it on all the time. For me it is a software design error. Obviously, the always-on stabilizer produces greater and unnecessary consumption. Chaotic on-screen touch control management. I mean those that can be called up with the info button. I got lost in it several times... When I do birdlife I often keep the automatic isos. For some strange reason (but it's probably me who touches inside some commands without realizing it) the camera went to iso 100 by itself: points, shots at a glance and you find yourself a dark image. I didn't mind the arrangement of the controls that I set so that I have on the speed and aperture rings (standard) and on the adapter ring the ISO. Certainly the low weight compared to my 7D2 is a plus and I had no problem holding it. I had a lot of difficulty bringing home useful shots. I was probably biased or it's me who doesn't know how to use that machine or ML in general, but as I got it I gave it away. Let's see if and when the R7 mark II comes out, or if they will throw out a machine that really has a professional level. The personal feeling is that Canon's entire ML series is made to get you the R5. On DSLRs there was clearly a vastness of better choice.

David Casoni

sent on May 10, 2025

Pros: Shutter speed, stabilization, megapixels (on this camera they are a con in some cases)

Cons: Sensor too dense for an APSC, infinite noise, buffer memory

Opinion: I've had the R7 for about a year now, and while it's soon to be my backup body, I can say that it surprised me in many ways, especially when it comes to video. The stabilization is really impressive: when I shoot handheld, the result is so stable that it feels like I have used a tripod. In my opinion, it's on par with Lumix cameras, if not even better. Another point that I find really positive is the C-Log 3 color profile. For the price range of the machine, it offers good dynamic range and color rendering that makes post-production easier and more satisfying. I was particularly impressed by the ability to retain detail in both highlights and shadows, which is no small feat if you work with video. Moving on to the photo side, there are a few things worth saying. First of all, the main flaw for me concerns the handling of high ISO. I'm pretty picky about this, and I can say that when you exceed certain ISO values, the image quality deteriorates considerably. In low-light situations, you completely lose detail, colors become flat, and digital noise is quite an issue. It is a machine that, if you use it in low light conditions, needs bright optics to perform at its best. In general, kit optics aren't really the best for achieving exceptional image quality in these conditions, so it's best to focus on faster lenses (f/1.8 or f/2.8) to get the most out of the camera. For the rest, the autofocus is super responsive, accurate even with moving subjects, and the camera is really fast, with fast shutter speeds and an exposure system that adapts well to different light conditions. The build quality is solid, the grip is comfortable even during long shoots. I conclude by saying that the R7 is a camera that works great for videos, with a stabilization that has nothing to envy to more expensive models, and a color profile that greatly facilitates the work in post-production. However, when it comes to low-light photos, it's crucial to use bright optics to get really good images.

There are 29 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EOS R7

Full moon in heronry

by Leonardo Battista
84 comments, 3497 views [editors pick]

The gift of the feather

by Daniele Collesei
120 comments, 11256 views

HI RES 10.6 MP

Marten (Martens martens)

by Giordano52
109 comments, 5181 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Isabella

by Wildpix
45 comments, 12893 views [editors pick]

Cerura vinula

by Ladislav
58 comments, 4583 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

A FOUNTAIN

by Picco Umberto
62 comments, 6008 views

HI RES 32.3 MP

The two little brothers

by Nic1978
49 comments, 6124 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Rusty Hunchback

by Cirillo Giovanni
132 comments, 9634 views

HI RES 14.5 MP

Strawberry tree caterpillar ...

by Tony Bova
49 comments, 3258 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Look into the camera! (Phelsuma grandis)

by Juza
27 comments, 6745 views

HI RES 11.8 MP

Mr. & Mrs Blanc

by Thom
48 comments, 2118 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

On the top

by Geronte2000
33 comments, 3000 views [editors pick]

Meeting

by Geronte2000
24 comments, 3127 views [editors pick]

Our home is Seceda

by Daniele Collesei
57 comments, 4574 views

HI RES 9.8 MP

Little owl

by Kasra Haghgou
49 comments, 3108 views

Untitled Photo

by Prajzner_lukasz
26 comments, 2377 views

HI RES 11.2 MP

Fight for love

by Daniele Collesei
44 comments, 5517 views

Bulbul on the hunt

by Juza
32 comments, 4666 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Sympetrum fonscolombii

by Alb83
36 comments, 1602 views

HI RES 7.0 MP

On the stick

by Geronte2000
32 comments, 1931 views [editors pick]

Only

by Alcedo.Photos
31 comments, 3972 views [editors pick]

Golden Eagle Italian Alps

by Emilio63
58 comments, 4568 views

Slow Wunderpus

by Geronte2000
29 comments, 2110 views [editors pick]

HOT PEPPER.....

by Gazebo
92 comments, 3951 views

HI RES 22.2 MP

The Knight's Bath

by Riccardo Farina
24 comments, 2885 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Look inside

by Geronte2000
34 comments, 2228 views [editors pick]

Marsh harrier

by Spanu Luigi
91 comments, 3098 views

HI RES 9.8 MP

Eagle owl

by Daniele Collesei
55 comments, 5653 views

Adult female

by Himantopus
27 comments, 3102 views [editors pick]

Waxbill Couple

by Juza
25 comments, 3830 views

HI RES 28.8 MP

Zerynthia polyxena

by Ladislav
25 comments, 1257 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

White-headed duck

by Naserml
19 comments, 2136 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Little crake

by Spanu Luigi
89 comments, 1595 views

HI RES 9.8 MP

Golden eagle Italian Alps

by Emilio63
28 comments, 6331 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Bluethroat

by Spanu Luigi
87 comments, 1789 views

HI RES 9.8 MP

Reptilian tragedy

by Atrox
41 comments, 3588 views

HI RES 5.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
27 comments, 4381 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Canon » Canon EOS R7

Canon EOS R7 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Canon EOS R7