JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EOS R5 Mark II : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is a mirrorless camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 45 megapixels manufactured from 2024. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 102400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 30 FPS x 93 RAW, 200 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 4199 €;

39 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10

Sensor
Format	Fullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	45 megapixel (pixel pitch 4.39 μm)
Sensor type	CMOS BSI Stacked (sensor readout: 1/160)
ISO sensitivities	50 - 102400
File formats	JPEG, RAW
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/32000
Exp. compensation	+/- 5 stops at 1/3 steps
Exp. modes	M, S, A, P
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Canon RF (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	Yes
Continuos shooting (with autofocus)	30 FPS x 93 RAW, 200 JPEG
Pre-Burst	Yes
Live View	Yes
Video mode	8K (7680x4320p) @ 60 FPS
WiFi	Yes
GPS	No
USB	USB-C (3.2 2x2)
USB Charging	Yes
Computing Features
ND Long Exposure	No
Pixel Shift	No
Focus Stacking	Yes, in-camera
Startrail/Composite mode	No
Astrotracer	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	Yes
LCD	3.2″, 2.1 Mdots, 1024 x 680 pixels, fully articulating
Viewfinder	Electronic, coverage 100%, 0.76x
Viewfinder resolution	1600 x 1200 px
Flash	No
Storage	CFExpress Type B
Storage, Slot 2	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II)
Shutter	Mechanical and electronic
Battery	Canon LP-E6P, 17.20 Wh
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	746 g
Dimensions	138 x 101 x 93 mm
Buy
Canon EOS R5 Mark II, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Markkob

sent on January 21, 2026

Pros: Stacked sensor, customizable AF, high IQ, ergonomics, bright and blackout-free viewfinder, monitor, feature-rich

Cons: Price... but you pay for quality!

Opinion: Canon has hit the bull's eye again with the 5 series, which has always been a symbol of the professional range and undisputed reliability. The R5mkII continues the tradition and comes with a body that fits very well in the hands, robust, comfortable and that does not tire even after long sessions. Very good battery life for a mirrorless camera, the capacity and ergonomics increase considerably by applying the battery grip and it is certainly an accessory that I would recommend when using long and heavy lenses, in order to better balance weight and center of gravity. AF configuration and menu settings of a real pro camera, it has so many setting possibilities that it is impossible not to be able to sew it on yourself, whatever the photographic genre you are preparing for. I found the focus with the eye very good (after performing 2/3 precision calibrations), despite the conflicting opinions I read on the web and, often, it helped me in low light conditions when the AF struggled with the lock (although very rarely), promptly bringing the focus back to the right point I was looking for. It digests any lens, from RF lenses, to adapted EFs, to vintage manual lenses and, thanks to the precision of focus peaking, it allows you to rediscover old gems locked in the drawer for years, but which still have a very interesting character. A mention goes to the EVF which, with its brightness and high resolution, does not make you regret that of reflex cameras especially because it does not have blackouts during bursts and is always ready to provide you with the real view of what is happening in front of your eyes. For birdlife and sports it is exceptional, the speed of the autofocus is really very good and the tracking on the subject very reliable... When used with L-series, fixed or zoom lenses, it will certainly give its best, but it has never missed a beat even with standard lenses. Stacked sensor is a feature that is worth the upgrade alone, the rolling shutter effect is practically zero and you can safely shoot with an electronic shutter, in any context you are! The raw file it produces is very workable in post-production, the 14-bit (even with electronic shutter) make themselves felt both with the excellent dynamic range, and with the weight of the file itself, so a good PC for editing and large storage are quite a must. Even the jpegs it churns out are respectable and ready to be delivered, especially in sporting events, provided as always to expose well and adjust every parameter as it should ... In such contexts it is advisable to keep an Auto ISO setting in a range between 100-12800 and it will not disappoint the final expectations. For high ISO values, shooting in RAW, you don't have the slightest problem of recovery in post-production, a sign that there is a lot of flab under the hood!! Obviously high price, but in line with the quality of the product... In its segment, it has few rivals! Thank you Canon for this other gem!!

Tnekralc

sent on November 15, 2025

Pros: High image quality, versatility, rich functions, ergonomics, energy consumption

Cons: Some limited criticalities with the autofocus, perhaps rather complex menu due to the amount of options, otherwise I found no faults

Opinion: Purchased a few months ago, it represented for me the entry into the modern mirrorless world. Taking into account that I only use it to take photos, so far it has met expectations very much. Robust enough to fall out of my hand without having even a scratch, it is a concentrate of technologies, so much so that in some contexts I have not yet found the best possible combination to make the most of its characteristics. The quality performance is very good, beyond the resolution itself I find that dynamics and colors are excellent, with very well workable files produced. The autonomy is good, with the battery grip you can largely exceed a thousand shots. Excellent autofocus with all the lenses I own, only in some very critical junctures does it show limits. I don't use focus with the eye as I don't think it's accurate enough, at least in my case, I prefer to do without it. Good ergonomics, I had to become familiar with the new layout of the controls but the adaptation was very quick and now I find it particularly apt as a solution. The electronic viewfinder is much appreciated, which does not make you regret the optical version of the reflex cameras excessively, the display is comfortable and versatile. Honestly, so far I think I have exploited only a small part of the potential of the car but after all it is very difficult to use all the functions, unless you want to do it only for the purpose of real technical testing. In the end, the mix offered is very satisfactory and I judge the cost of the camera to be well correlated with the features offered.

Jacopograziano

sent on October 27, 2025

Pros: Sensor, functionality, versatility, viewfinder, comfort

Cons: Overheating, materials, expensive

Opinion: Tested by Canon Italia for a few days together with the 70-200 pcs, the historic Canon 5 series that stands as the definitive all-rounder in the camera market. Compared to the first generation, finally here we have a competitive camera in terms of functionality and not a run-up to the mirrorless world. Rolling shutter and other issues of the first version have been fixed. We find ourselves in the hands of a definitive expense that should "pay for itself" over the years between photography and video. The autofocus is nothing short of perfect, completely customizable in areas and modes, an AF that I appreciated more than Sony's operation (less customizable). Excellent sensor, synergy with the lenses known canon, the colors are the right ones and everything works wonderfully. And yet it warms. it heats up a mess, it heats up so much that, during a 4-hour shooting, with short bursts of PHOTOS, not videos, with the fan handle they provided me, it overheated. It had never happened to me to overheat a car while taking photos, a very strange situation that left a great bitter taste in my mouth. The body is produced with a different plastic from Sony or Nikon which gives it a "toy" feeling and seems to cost much less, having said that the buttons and the grip are perfect and well positioned. It left me with a huge doubt, for what it costs I expected the perfect photo and video camera, burst and mpx, robust and transportable, if it freezes while I work but everything collapses (specifically they didn't tell me it was a pre-production model, it was a retail). Splendid viewfinder even if with me the eye tracking has never worked, how sad.

Valter Degni

sent on September 23, 2025

Pros: autofocus, ergonomics, file quality, batt duration (below I'll explain why...), pre-shooting, the third thumb ring (I put the exposure there)

Cons: only one slot, Signa and Tamron not compatible (nice .... (a)

Opinion: I premise no video and exclusive use for nature photography, perennially merged with the Canon 600 f4 II. The battery life has monstrously increased because I never use the screen (which I don't use by definition) and above all because the viewfinder turns off as I detach the eye from the eyepiece, we are about 2000 shots and more (bursts). The quality of the file is superlative and in case of noise, Topaz De Noise digests it spectacularly. Ergonomics are very personal, and for me they are perfect, neither big nor small. The AF with the eye never used because it locks on to the subject's eye so well that it is not needed. The stabilization with medium-short focal lengths works very well, with the 600 I can't say because it works very well on its own. Speaking of buffers, with the right board (V60) it's a rocket. As mentioned they have added (compared to my previous 7DmkII) a third "thumb" dial that can be set, very useful for balancing the exposure instead of the key/front dial combination.

Vico352

sent on June 29, 2025

Pros: Lightness, image quality

Cons: autofocus, in my case very disappointing, perceived quality, ergonomics that can be improved

Opinion: I use both Canon and Nikon and before making a final choice I chose the way to experiment and compare the 2 systems personally. I have owned the R5 mark II for about 2 months sign updated to the latest version, main use of birds with a lens of 200 800 that I also use with the R7. The autofocus in my case is particularly ineffective especially on birds in flight, a situation in which the R5 mark II should be the excellence, I must say that with the R7 the results are much superior which is saying something. I also own a Nikon Z8 with several FX and Z lenses including the Z 180 600, consideration; weight aside, the results with Nikon are much more effective. In some cases I also came out with the two systems, so the same conditions to be clear, the same actions and predictable movements of the subject (feeding the chicks with actions to and from the nest) At 20 frames according to most of the time the Canon after 4 shots loses focus and goes into the background, the Nikon Z8 when it locks on and you are good at keeping the subject in the frame hardly lets it go. With Canon I tried all possible autofocus settings (basic: servo/animal eye detection/tracking) with very disappointing results. I thought it could be the lens (unfortunately I don't have any other telephoto lenses to compare at the moment) but why if I use it with the R7 I get much better results ?? Basically for me the R5 Mark II is a disappointment, I hope I can change my mind because in terms of weight the advantages are evident even if in terms of robustness and ergonomics the sensations when I use Nikon are more gratifying.

There are 4 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EOS R5 Mark II

The jump of the young ibex

by Emilio63
93 comments, 4361 views [editors pick]

Jackle

by Ali Hasanpour
61 comments, 3262 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Battle between the jackal and the eagle

by Nejadi
67 comments, 3315 views [editors pick]

Starlings

by PannaeFragola
48 comments, 4453 views [editors pick]

Fights on the lake

by Alessandro Beconi
60 comments, 3724 views [editors pick]

Yaffle

by Daniele_Occhiato
62 comments, 3838 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Incense red

by Alessandro Beconi
50 comments, 2133 views [editors pick]

Water rail

by Daniele_Occhiato
45 comments, 3444 views [editors pick]

Pheasant ♂

by Marco50
74 comments, 2666 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Small lynxes

by Marco50
75 comments, 3235 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Ermine

by Emilio63
40 comments, 2303 views

The sparrowhawk's salute

by Marco50
79 comments, 2561 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

PARDINA LYNX

by Marco50
66 comments, 3432 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Lynx Baby

by Marco50
60 comments, 2430 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Golden Eagle Italian Alps

by Emilio63
38 comments, 4305 views

Games

by Marco50
51 comments, 2178 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Golden Eagle Italian Alps

by Emilio63
46 comments, 3599 views

The green ? woodpecker bath

by Marco50
75 comments, 1405 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Owl

by PannaeFragola
29 comments, 1699 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Goshawk

by Emilio63
38 comments, 3406 views

Iberian Lynx

by Marco50
60 comments, 2174 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Weaning Hoopoe

by Marco50
58 comments, 1353 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Garganey

by PannaeFragola
34 comments, 2079 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Unexpected Griffin

by Marco50
64 comments, 2088 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Kestrel

by PannaeFragola
38 comments, 1688 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

The attack

by Alessandro Beconi
53 comments, 2338 views

Kestrel

by Daniele_Occhiato
32 comments, 1430 views

Ermine

by Emilio63
23 comments, 1644 views

WOLF WITH PREY

by C.Pedriali
43 comments, 1652 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Terrible Brothers

by Davide Fusco
36 comments, 2252 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Roar 2024

by Emilio63
25 comments, 2534 views

Flaps of wings

by Maurizio Lanini
44 comments, 2405 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Air SHOW tricolor arrows

by Marco50
47 comments, 1277 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Discussion

by Marco50
48 comments, 1176 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Sparrowhawk ?

by Marco50
63 comments, 1831 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Chamois

by Emilio63
26 comments, 1162 views

Owl

by PannaeFragola
30 comments, 1543 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Canon » Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R5 Mark II : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Canon EOS R5 Mark II