JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM is a supertele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2011 to 2018 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price was 10680 €;

30 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	600 mm
Angle of view	4.1°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	16 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	4.50 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.15x
Features
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	52 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	3920 g
Dimensions	168 x 449 mm
Buy
Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 257000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

_Axl_

sent on February 22, 2024

Pros: Perfect image quality, incredible sharpness, ideal lens to be multiplied, bright aperture, construction at the highest level, micro-contrast, blur and image stabilization.

Cons: Fragile lens hood fixing system, very expensive lens hood replacement (€ 919,00), weight compared to current models.

Opinion: Ultimate goal. Construction at the highest level, the lens body is entirely made of magnesium and/or titanium, the switches on the lens body are in the right place and show all the controls you need and the MAF ring is perfect and fluid. The lens is, of course, tropicalized like a Canon L-Series and, therefore, this allows its use even in adverse conditions. Optical design consisting of fluorite and UD elements that counteract aberrations and distortions. It's an exceptional lens and has the ideal range for wildlife photography (from large African mammals to passerines) and sports photography. 600mm with a constant f4 aperture is the best you could wish for to bring your subject closer without disturbing it. It's my favorite lens for Safaris where I mount it on the Canon R5 whose 45 Megapixel sensor is perfect to bring out all the details that this wonderful lens can give. The constant f4 aperture and the incredible IQ of this lens make it perfectly compatible with TCs, in particular, with the 1.4x III the loss of detail is almost zero, with the 2x III the drop is greater but the image remains fully usable. It is a definitive lens and this can be seen as soon as you open the images on the monitor that will be incredibly sharp and micro-contrasted, full of detail and with superb color restitution. But it is the detachment of the planes that leaves you speechless, already @600mm at f4 or, even better, @840 (with TC 1.4x inserted) at f5.6, the in-focus portion will emerge in a surreal way from a creamy, unique and wonderful blur that nothing, absolutely nothing, has to do with those applied in post production.

Eliad

sent on February 22, 2024

Pros: Photographic quality, Blur greater than the other lenses 500mm f4 - 400mm f2.8 - 300mm f2.8, in fact it is the lens that blurs the most of all, Stabilization excellent, Autofocus speed.

Cons: None other than the weight, but it weighs as much as the 400mm f2.8 II

Opinion: The lens par excellence, the 600mm is the most powerful lens in terms of optical quality, autofocus speed, blur, zoom. Compared to the younger siblings. Lens that doesn't need an extender, it brings everything closer with a spectacular micro contrast!! The lens allows a multiplication with an excellent 1.4x becoming an 840mm f5.6 (obviously with the depth of field of a 600mm f4 higher than all lenses) without loss of sharpness!!

Francesco Lo Gullo

sent on March 15, 2023

Pros: Build quality, sharpness, stabilization.

Cons: Weight compared to the new models.

Opinion: I took it recently, trading in my beloved 500 mm II version, I immediately noticed a better sharpness already from F4, the stabilization is surprising and allows you to take home shots even without the use of the tripod. Excellent behavior with the extender canon 1.4 III. With the R5 he behaves very well and is very responsive and is always ready.

Valter Degni

sent on July 07, 2022

Pros: Reduced weight compared to the previous model; Exceptional full aperture sharpness; Minimum distance of MAF at 4.5m; Fourth generation stabilization; Price since today July 2022 being out of production is at acceptable prices compared to the brand new versions.

Cons: none

Opinion: Having the opportunity to test its sharpness at full aperture, as soon as I could I replaced my old 600 series 1 (but glorious and faithful companion) with this. Sharpness that is not affected at all by the 1.4X III multiplier (always at full aperture) and its reduced minimum focusing distance allows unthinkable close-up shots, at the limit of the macro. A particular applause to the stabilizer that allows me to shoot from tripod up to 1/160 (with the 7D helps for ISO noise), also the low weight is felt with the backpack on your shoulders. It's an extraordinary optics of which I can not find faults for my way of shooting and in the short term to pair one of these new mirrorless, maybe the R7 (APSC), why not?

user4643

sent on March 07, 2013

Pros: Lighter than the previous model; Exceptional sharpness at full aperture; Minimum distance from MAF to 4.5 m; Stabilization of the fourth generation

Cons: Switch to distance focus set distances are not always optimal; Price (obviously. ..)

Opinion: I own this perspective from January 2013 and I have to say I'm definitely money (tanti. ..) better spent since I started taking pictures. Having had both the Canon 600 f4 IS, both the 500 f4 IS, the first thing that I noticed immediately after taking up the 600II is its relative lightness compared to the previous version, and about equal to that of 500; However, the different weight distribution inside the lens makes the lens seem even lighter than its actual weight, and if you are used to shoot handheld with the 500 f4 IS, you will have no problem to do the same with the new 600 II. rnIl highlight of this view, however, is the fantastic clarity even at full aperture. In practice, the difference in sharpness at f4 next to the aperture, f5.6, is equal to about 5%, a value close to zero that finally makes it possible to fully use the widest aperture without loss of quality of the final, with the advantage of being able to use Faster shutter speeds or ISO values ??less noisy andwith the important bonus of a blurred even more enjoyable. Quest 'incredible sharpness it can also fully appreciate using teleconverters, especially the new 2X-III; even with this teleconverter, in fact, you can safely shoot wide open with no obvious drop in sharpness, even in subjects that are at a certain distance. In practice, close the iris of one or more stop only becomes useful to increase the depth of field. The only drawback is, of course, the reduction in AF speed with the EOS 1D series until the 1D MarkIV: AF speed with the 2XIII significantly slower, though, with the subjects at a distance not too far from the location of the MAF lens ring and selector distance of MAF in the correct position, the latching speed is very fast and the speed of the AF in the pursuit of a subject in flight is not affected much; Therefore, we can say that the combination lens + 2X-III canò be safely used to shoot subjects in flight, too fast, as long as the trajectory relatively constant. The situation is different if you use camera bodies 5D MKIII and 1D-X: in this case also using the 2XIII AF speed remains very rapid and even the coupling to the subject, taking the limiting distance of the mesa in focus on FULL, suffers very little so that you can very well keep fixed to FULL (with other EOS 1D series to keep MarkIV FULL meant not being able to connect almost never the subject). rnUn Another important improvement over the previous model is the reduction the minimum distance of focus, scope now to 4.5 m; for those photographing small birds from a hide (or the car), this is really important because it allows the use of only 600 or 600 with 1, 4X and still get blown up really big subject in the frame (with a minimum of 5.5 m MAF distance of the previous model, it was often necessary to use the 2X with birds such as wren, Regulus, Fiorrancino and others). rnL'unico defect, if it can be considered, in my opinion is in the distances that can be set with the selector of focus, not very suitable in the photography of birds in flight, especially those of small and medium size. Very often, the birds straddle between the distances from 4.5 to 16 and 16 m-infinity or pass but -16 +16 m away and vice versa, which means that you will lose the fire in one direction or in the other (but not with the 1DX thanks to its great AF system). From this point of view the 500 f / 4 (both the old model and new model type II) is better since setting the selector MAF of 10 m-infinity there is the almost absolute certainty of never losing focus with subjects in flight at a distance more or less ravvicinata.rnrnCONCLUSIONE: in spite of the price maybe a bit 'too much, the build quality (exceptional) and the optics, as well as other factors such as the contour reduces the overall weight and reducing the minimum focusing distance focus, in my opinion make the miles perabsolute or objective for the birds, especially in countries like ours where the distance of flight of the subject is more 'or less high.

Photos taken with Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM

But it rains, it rains.... (Buzzard)

by PannaeFragola
102 comments, 16480 views [editors pick]

HI RES 13.5 MP

Golden Dawn with Grizzly

by Alessandro Beconi
141 comments, 12863 views [editors pick]

Lince pardina: family portrait

by Alessandro Beconi
167 comments, 16971 views [editors pick]

Great Gray Owl

by Alessandro Beconi
150 comments, 24225 views [editors pick]

Interweaving deadly

by Alessandro Beconi
153 comments, 23361 views [editors pick]

Exchange of gift from Albanella Minore

by Samuele Sereni
126 comments, 15287 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Quarrel

by Samuele Sereni
151 comments, 13265 views [editors pick]

You're my Prey

by Alessandro Beconi
108 comments, 12138 views [editors pick]

Family Lite

by Samuele Sereni
97 comments, 13436 views [editors pick]

Family

by Alessandro Beconi
91 comments, 7662 views [editors pick]

Saltimapalo

by PannaeFragola
68 comments, 6247 views [editors pick]

HI RES 10.7 MP

A strange enemy .....

by Alessandro Beconi
90 comments, 16987 views

Queen's falcon (eleonorae falcon)

by Roberto Vacca
113 comments, 8326 views [editors pick]

Steppe eagle

by Nejadi
74 comments, 9355 views [editors pick]

Steppe Eagle

by Behinn
77 comments, 14185 views [editors pick]

Puma

by Giovanni Mari
70 comments, 15033 views [editors pick]

Nightingale of Japan

by PannaeFragola
64 comments, 5337 views [editors pick]

HI RES 10.7 MP

Owl

by PannaeFragola
51 comments, 4791 views [editors pick]

HI RES 13.5 MP

Quarrel

by Samuele Sereni
86 comments, 7153 views [editors pick]

F16 Belgium Display Flight

by Labbeduddel
36 comments, 15910 views [editors pick]

Serval and prey

by Alessandro Beconi
60 comments, 4836 views [editors pick]

Black-winged kite

by Nejadi
49 comments, 7390 views [editors pick]

A walk with mom

by Alessandro Beconi
95 comments, 12551 views

Teal

by PannaeFragola
46 comments, 3460 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.9 MP

Bee-eater

by Nejadi
83 comments, 5689 views

Snowy owl in golden light

by Alessandro Beconi
97 comments, 7917 views

Wolf

by Nejadi
41 comments, 5954 views [editors pick]

Pin-tailed Sandgrouse - Pterocles alchata

by Tomás Martins
53 comments, 6896 views [editors pick]

Green woodpecker juv

by Valter Degni
59 comments, 5016 views [editors pick]

HI RES 6.0 MP

Magpies

by PannaeFragola
44 comments, 6009 views [editors pick]

HI RES 5.2 MP

Combatant

by Maurizio Catti
43 comments, 2286 views [editors pick]

HI RES 8.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Lactating fox

by Alessandro Beconi
69 comments, 4722 views

Indian Wild Ass

by Abdallah
85 comments, 5390 views

Hide and seek

by Alessandro Beconi
87 comments, 5589 views

Disputes between Piro Piro

by PannaeFragola
23 comments, 3635 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Little owl

by Behinn
69 comments, 8590 views

Cuckoo

by Bruno
77 comments, 4293 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM

Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM