JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM : Specifications and Opinions

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM

The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2002 to 2012 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1050 €;

120 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	24-70 mm
Angle of view	84.1 - 34.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	16 elements in 13 groups
Min. focus distance	0.38 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.29x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	950 g
Dimensions	83 x 124 mm
Buy
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Real-flyswat

sent on October 29, 2024

Pros: Robust / good picture quality / weather sealed / fun to use

Cons: heavy / cromatic aberration

Opinion: A pro lens which will not let You down. I like it especially for portraits. Detail and color rendition is very good in my opinion. Night shots are great with this lens. Also i had used this lens in heavy rain, and it never failed. Yes, it is large and heavy. So sometimes i leave it at home because of that. Cromatic aberration is slightly visible in specific light set ups. But i would say it is at an acceptable range. Autofocus is fast and smooth. This is a lens that You will keep for Your entire life! I recommend it.

Dassielhh

sent on June 30, 2015

Pros: Sharpness, Large Aperture, good for low light, fast focus, resistant

Cons: too heavy, at 70 mm a bit soft in the corners. No IS.

Opinion: I have this lens from 5 years now. It is fast, provide good quality of image, sharp. I'm using it as an all around lens. Even if I've dropped it a couples of times , it's still working well and it is a wonderful lens. Maybe it is to heavy comparing with other lenses from its class, but it's an L lens. Wide aperture makes it suitable for many situation that's why I have it all time in my bag.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Alessandro_Gennari

sent on February 25, 2025

Pros: L-series, build quality, rendering, and blurry

Cons: Very bulky lens hood

Opinion: Lens that I am very fond of because it was my first L Series. Even if it made me suffer a bit - read the breakage of the flat cable that forced me to service - it gave me great satisfaction. The rendering is very poetic and almost vintage, still excellent now if you are not fanatical of "surgical" sharpness from corner to corner of the frame and excellent for obtaining beautiful portraits. The blur is very nice and soft. The only real flaw I found is the decidedly bulky lens hood, but this is obviously the result of the construction philosophy. The weight? It's not a feather, but after all we're talking about a constant f/2.8. For the rest, it is an absolutely recommended lens with which I have shot in many areas: from sports to concerts to commercial work in the studio. The all-rounder focal length also makes it very flexible. Only changed professional needs made me turn towards version II, otherwise I would have kept it for a long time.

CesareCallisto

sent on December 07, 2021

Pros: Construction, paired zoom/hood mechanism, colors, blurred, sharpness, 77 filters, minimum MAF, flare resistance, blurred

Cons: I can not find if not a variable yield of specimens and the cost of overhaul bushings

Opinion: The latest lens made by Canon without having to please wall photographers. Why do I say this? Today, lenses must be full-aperture hypernitide from the center to the edges without varying by one line per millimeter. I do not know why but apparently everything that Ernst Leitz II said about how he must make an optics, the same ideas that made his company famous, no longer apply, or that there must be an excellent contrast and sharpness in the center that must decrease slightly at the edges, this helps to detach the subject. The Canon 24-70 is just like that at full aperture, well sharp on the point of MAF and slightly fades the rest, the blurred is very soft, the classic colors warm and never too saturated Canon, has a little vignetting, made for me sublime. Closed at F8/11 it becomes perfect and sharp from edge to edge, without having an exaggerated contrast, you have to deal with a bit of curvature of the field, so you have to know how to focus on the edges. It holds the flare, 77 filters, very human size, very fast AF and beautiful almost Macro mode. Of course it is built very well, at 24 it is elongated and at 70 retracted, this allows you to have a hood that works at any focal length (the usual canon pro with velvet). It has only one constructive problem to the bushings, they wear out and after a while it begins to lose performance, the revision costs € 350 but is deserved by the yield of the lens. It has not been in production for a while, I found one of the last in impeccable condition, on the 1DX it is his death for the "short" side.

Giovanni Leoni

sent on May 01, 2021

Pros: Exactly what my friend Paul wrote.

Cons: Like above.

Opinion: Let me start: I make portraits and, in the "feminine" portrait, the sharpness as described by Paolo, the detachment of the floors, and the blurry make it an indispensable "piece". I add a "very personal" consideration/opinion (which is then the reason for my comment). As is well known, zooms generally stretch in canvas position, and fall into a wide-angle position. "This" works in reverse (and this would, in itself, be a VALID reason to rub it as a piece of collector's interest!)! that? Canon never explained it, as far as I know. "In my opinion" the reason lies precisely in the blessed paraluce, rightly praised by Paul. In the indented position (canvas) you enjoy a FULLY efficient lampshon; in an extruded position (wide angle) it correctly offers itself for a few millimeters, so as not to vignette. The standard scheme, which theoretically would have allowed better results in terms of resolution, instead obliges a lampshed calculated not to vignette at 24 mm., but thus, in the tele position, there is virtually no protection from the rays of light accidents. With a more "traditional" construction (EF 24-70/2.8 L Mk. II, for example) therefore, it would probably have been possible to obtain MTF (theoretical!!!) a little better BUT, "in the field", having a TRUE AND FUNCTIONAL lampshon would still have led to better images (no less negatively affected by flares). My opinion is that Canon's mathematicians reasoned in these terms! Then, with the Mk. II, to better conform to the wishes of the "ox park" (always insatiable in requesting the "the more there is, the better" -of resolution, in this case-!) they changed course, according to the wishes of the mktg.. My opinion (that I own both), of course.

There are 26 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM

Reflecting to Arpy

by Caterina Bruzzone
428 comments, 47452 views [editors pick]

Vernazza

by Caterina Bruzzone
276 comments, 66698 views [editors pick]

Lake Misurina

by Caterina Bruzzone
222 comments, 39368 views

The wave and the rainbow

by Caterina Bruzzone
260 comments, 54164 views [editors pick]

Plougrescant

by Caterina Bruzzone
225 comments, 57406 views [editors pick]

Odle

by Caterina Bruzzone
140 comments, 36963 views [editors pick]

Gasadalur

by Ilfruttodelpeccato
132 comments, 25483 views [editors pick]

Tellaro

by Caterina Bruzzone
180 comments, 48001 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Eugenia

by Pontremolig
83 comments, 27787 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.2 MP

Ile Rousse

by Caterina Bruzzone
207 comments, 36486 views

Breakfast with Audrey

by Pontremolig
55 comments, 16937 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.2 MP

Venice

by Takayama
88 comments, 28649 views [editors pick]

The moon illuminates the heaven above rolle '

by Massimo Coizzi Fotografia
112 comments, 22487 views

Golden Light

by Ilfruttodelpeccato
120 comments, 24475 views

Quiberon

by Caterina Bruzzone
81 comments, 15236 views

Surrealism Royal

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
67 comments, 13121 views

Looking at the last spring fog

by Diamante_P
160 comments, 12096 views

Monferrato

by Caterina Bruzzone
91 comments, 17204 views

Toward the light

by Caterina Bruzzone
173 comments, 9058 views

Nerves colors on the sea

by Caterina Bruzzone
132 comments, 19278 views

Put a winter evening ...

by Caterina Bruzzone
153 comments, 18245 views

Rome - Castel Sant'Angelo

by Angelo Adorisio
228 comments, 12846 views

HI RES 21.0 MP

Motherhood

by RusianaTosheva
41 comments, 7936 views [editors pick]

HI RES 25.2 MP

Desire to Provence

by Caterina Bruzzone
153 comments, 9798 views

Grandes Jorasses reflected in the lake Arpy

by Caterina Bruzzone
65 comments, 11334 views

Atomium, the tunnel

by Claudio Sciarra
133 comments, 9276 views [editors pick]

Bonifacio

by Caterina Bruzzone
62 comments, 11722 views

One evening fog in Trevi (rectified)

by Diamante_P
133 comments, 11913 views

Colors of the sea

by Caterina Bruzzone
131 comments, 14202 views

Untitled (lilly)

by John Deckard
24 comments, 17945 views [editors pick]

"And the locomotive seemed a strange monster"

by Claudio Sciarra
130 comments, 8294 views

Here comes the storm

by Caterina Bruzzone
139 comments, 15745 views

So far

by Vincenzo Mazza
58 comments, 6380 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Lavender and clouds

by Caterina Bruzzone
128 comments, 16564 views

Mont Saint Michel blue hour

by Caterina Bruzzone
144 comments, 12147 views

Details of autumn

by Caterina Bruzzone
116 comments, 14427 views

Thunderstorm on cypress trees

by Marco Corso
65 comments, 5261 views

HI RES 27.9 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM