JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Lenses
Lenses Canon
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II

The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2014 to 2025 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2275 €;

218 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	100-400 mm
Angle of view	24.4 - 6.2°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4.5-5.6
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	21 elements in 16 groups
Min. focus distance	0.98 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.31x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1570 g
Dimensions	94 x 193 mm
Buy
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Petervdh

sent on October 03, 2020

Pros: Extremely sharp and contrasty, excellent IS, fast accurate focusing and minimum focusing distance. Adapts well to the Canon 1.4x III tele-converter.Cons:

Cons: Occasional purple fringing on high-contrast subjects. Tripod collar not removable. Expensive in South Africa @ ZAR 39,695-00.

Opinion: Very well thought out lens from Canon. I emediant love the lens when I first used it. Being a non push pull zoom keeps ones hand in the same position for better stabilising the lens. I had the version 1 with which I was not happy with. It can be a bit short at the long end for photographing wildlife and birds but it pairs well with the newest 1.4 converter from Canon.

Johnmwright

sent on September 09, 2016

Pros: Extremely sharp and contrasty, portable, takes the Canon 1.4x III tele-converter well, fast accurate focusing, excellent IS (image stabilization), and the minimum focus distance is 1 meter.

Cons: Occasional purple fringing on high-contrast subjects. Bokeh isn't as nice as a prime, of course (but it isn't terrible). I wish the tripod collar was removable. Expensive.

Opinion: This is the best tele-zoom I've ever used. It is an improvement in every way over the original 100-400. It is sharper, faster focusing, more accurate, has better stabilization, and handles the 1.4x TC III well. However, the best feature for me is the 1m close focus (1/3 life size at 400mm), which lets me get closer to frogs than before. While the bigger faster super-teles have advantages, this is the best portable tele available for Canon. I've used the original 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 300f/4L, original 100-400L... the 100-400 mark II is better than all of them... except the 300/f4L is smaller/lighter. None of the other lenses I listed are bad (they are all excellent), but the 100-400 mark II is noticeably better.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Maurizio Catti

sent on July 23, 2025

Pros: Sharpness, AF speed, weight, convenience, focal range, enhanced with RF adapter

Cons: for me no one

Opinion: It is always in the backpack, whether you are doing a safari, or going to the north pole, great sharpness and contrast even mounting the 1.4x III teleconverter, an excellent all-rounder in every aspect that, as I said, in the transition to mirrorless with the original adapter has gained in speed and precision of the af so much so that I resold the 100-500 RF and I bought the 100-400 ef II for the second time, losing 100 mm but gaining 1000 euros and 1/3 stop of maximum brightness.

Doriano Ciardo

sent on November 15, 2024

Pros: Great all-rounder for sharpness and range.

Cons: Heavy

Opinion: One of the heaviest optics I've ever had, I thought the 28-70 was ignorant but this one beats it in every sense (it would be 100 gr. difference but it seems more). The metal of the barrel denotes the use for which it was designed. Very professional optics with an excellent stabilizer and above average glass quality. High performance over the entire range exploited by the R5mk2 and R3. With the R adapter you don't notice the imbalance, it's already full-bodied.

Enzo-Spotter

sent on March 01, 2024

Pros: Being Canon

Cons: For now, none

Opinion: I wanted to replace the Tamron 100 - 400 Di VC USD. In short, the difference in quality is perceptible in all conditions. I take aeronautical photos and often push to extreme focal lengths, I have been able to see that at 400mm it has no comparison with the Tamron which already from 300mm suffers from excessive softness of the images. Super stabilization even handheld. Of course, the weight does not play in favor of the Canon and the price, of course, is not at all comparable (the Tamron costs 1200€ less). On the other hand, that extra stop in favor of the Canon plays a fundamental factor in favor of the Canon optics. I use it on both an APSC and a full-frame. On the APSC I noticed a greater decay of quality at the upper extreme focal length, but I think it depends on the size of the sensor.

There are 54 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II

Portrait at -52 degrees C

by Mbuttu
171 comments, 23060 views [editors pick]

The fox and the jay

by FabiomassimoTurri
149 comments, 22821 views [editors pick]

Walk halo

by Leonardo Battista
117 comments, 14052 views [editors pick]

Water Games, In

by Federico Pelliccia
129 comments, 18792 views [editors pick]

The flight dell'ulula

by Alessandro Beconi
180 comments, 30832 views [editors pick]

Aquila chrysaetos

by Emilio63
145 comments, 29752 views [editors pick]

Flying over the red dunes

by Alessandro Beconi
192 comments, 14210 views [editors pick]

Moustached warbler

by Spanu Luigi
253 comments, 29179 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Passage in the ford

by Fabio Rosas
117 comments, 13753 views [editors pick]

Green February

by Fabrizios53
215 comments, 18631 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.7 MP

Where dare ibex

by Fiore Cao
145 comments, 21967 views [editors pick]

HI RES 8.6 MP

Double jump

by DavideOtta
167 comments, 7092 views [editors pick]

HI RES 6.1 MP

The caiman and the Pirana

by Stefano Ceci
104 comments, 17398 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Owl Capogrosso

by Ivan77
121 comments, 10917 views [editors pick]

Adriatic

by Matteo2000
111 comments, 4452 views [editors pick]

Ecstasy...

by Corradini Corrado
118 comments, 18281 views

Landing in paradise

by Marcom
129 comments, 15830 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

The hope of better times...

by Alessandro Callea
204 comments, 14204 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Autumn at sunset.

by Rivo50
145 comments, 12252 views [editors pick]

HI RES 13.1 MP

Purple Heron

by Spanu Luigi
177 comments, 22058 views

Looks from the woods

by Stefano Ceci
84 comments, 12016 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Among the branches of the lars...

by Fabio Usvardi
81 comments, 9702 views [editors pick]

HI RES 6.0 MP

Quickly Crazy .....

by Palmieri Raimondo
555 comments, 26891 views

HI RES 9.6 MP

Sparrowhawk hunting for starlings

by Leonardo Battista
86 comments, 10718 views [editors pick]

Imperial eagle

by Nejadi
74 comments, 14684 views [editors pick]

Morning Glory, New America

by Gianluca Lombardi
65 comments, 8196 views [editors pick]

Silence and loneliness

by Alessandro Beconi
117 comments, 9439 views [editors pick]

Crested Tit

by Fabio Gnoni
95 comments, 21944 views [editors pick]

Hypnotic

by Vioz
74 comments, 8920 views [editors pick]

HI RES 15.5 MP

The gift of the feather

by Daniele Collesei
120 comments, 11252 views

HI RES 10.6 MP

Sunset visions

by Essezeta
73 comments, 3892 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Eurasian Wren ( Troglodytes troglodytes)

by Pawel68
137 comments, 12915 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

In the world of a single color.......

by Rivo50
108 comments, 5807 views [editors pick]

Fatal attraction

by Andrea Belingheri
53 comments, 8491 views [editors pick]

HI RES 8.2 MP

You turn on the Sunrise

by Fabrizios53
166 comments, 8900 views

Osprey

by Spanu Luigi
156 comments, 19595 views

Diving training

by Stefano Ceci
93 comments, 7799 views [editors pick]

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II