JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness, bokeh, construction, microcontrast and colors.
Cons:weight, focus ring a little wide, is addictive to wanting to use only zeiss lenses
Opinion:Optics with unbeatable performance for colors, sharpness and focus ... all with an impeccable construction ... the price to pay is only in the fact that it is a lens more oriented to the advanced amateur photographer and less to professionals of ceremonies in general .. at least do some work with a certain calm ... I mounted it on my d800 and with the slide dk 17 I can focus more easily than before .. coupled with a zoom type 70-200 you live peacefully with the maximum of opportunity to bring home any type of shooting from the supreme yield ..
Pros:I first list the cons, because everything else is pro ...
Cons:Weight, size and price.
Opinion:I give it 9 the poll, because the price and the weight brought him down, though, to make a purely technical thought a 10 would be too tight. You could make a disquisition on the fact that the Zeiss Otus 1.4 / 85 costs over € 4000.00, then perhaps you would think that 10 he deserves it, but the comparison I can do with my finances ... Comparisons with other brands , they are not compatible. We are in another dimension. And to think that I speak as a happy owner of a very good Canon 135mm, (which is lighter and cheaper). The absence of autofocus, I can not find a flaw, because when you need to think about the right focheggiatura does not hurt, adequate mechanical and not adapted, it does not hurt. Perhaps, to be accurate to that genre, you have to make some sacrifices. Milvus the Zeiss 1.4 / 85, finds its natural application with a ring of focus (perhaps a double helix ...), smooth, precise and absolutely flawless. I would say that is mechanically superior to the old Planar 85mm f1.4 C / Y and the newer classesc ZE. Optically it is comparable only to his brother Otus and the old men just mentioned. I have never seen in any goal, in my possession or other colleagues known to me, a concentration of sharpness, dynamic range, readings of the shadows and ... everything else!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
