JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Construction, perceived quality, color rendering, character.
Cons:Weight (plus a pro and a con)
Opinion:optical character and not suitable for everyone, as it always does Zeiss school and divides masse.rnIl mediocre photographer you see intimidated by a manual focus which I think allows you to enjoy and reflect on the photo giving a splendid amarcord.rnNon are slow for everyone also given the cost but I'm out of perhaps tempo.rnSono free from defects? NOPE! rnVignettano much, fall of sharpness at the edges but have character and have their timbro.rnNon there is a perfect optical but to me the number I Milvus gusto.rnBuona very light.
Opinion:After numerous tests have concluded that the Zeiss enjoy a great name but as they are not made at all, much less this Milvus 35mm f / 2. Sharpness only in the center, clear chromatic aberration, if it had been a Canon would have slaughtered all but with this name all at his feet, along the building but the photos do not do only with building or designers .... ..the yield is a mediocre lens of 250 Euro, indeed even ..........
Cons:nobody, weight and manual maf are not, otherwise you do not buy one Zeiss. the only flaw that I see as an advantage is the vignetting in TA, in my view excellent in ambientati portraits.
Opinion:Excellent new finish and construction of Milvus series, seem of the design objects. In the past I had the 35/2 zf. first version, the optical design is the same as well as the yield, but this Milvus has been further improved. backlit now there is no flare shadow, ring maf already perfect in the past has been improved, now is rubberized, to touch the feeling of having total control of the focus, the accuracy is amazing. Grafted on the Nikon Df is quite balanced, as opposed to the 35 / 1.4 ZF.2 that I had, which was rather unbalanced forward. great for street, made incisissima and made unique uniformity from f2 to F.16 rnInteressante also the possibility of being able to use the diaphragm with fluid, releasable through a metal stick, making it also suitable for film makers.
Opinion:Yet another creature of the house Zeiss, solid, well-built, high yield. Like all Zeiss, and in particular the Milvus series, impresses the focusing movement capable of transmitting a control pleasant sensation. Goal must-have for lovers of the street genre. The sharpness from edge to edge is rewarding as well as color rendering. The Milvus series is the lightest, least expensive, and perhaps the most versatile and utile.rn
Pros:impeccable construction, size, weight, finish, lens hood metal scream. Focus on precision rifle.
Cons:anything
Opinion:is so well-balanced on the 5D Mark III I took to 1/15 and the photo has no trace of camera shake even zooming in to 200%. as for the 21 mm, bought last month, the manual focus is a pleasure difficult to describe. The ring on an excursion constant, without being either slow or hard, are you doing the hand after the first three shots. € 1,000 and applies them all, I would say more ...