JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Let's start by saying that the Bokeh at F2.8 is fabulous if you like the soap bubble effect that is great at its peak if you shoot with the subject from 1 meter to 2 and with the background placed around 5 meters. The sharpness is impressive if you think it's 50-60 and is recoverable in PP. The top you'll see it at F11 perfect at the edges. In the evening it gives you an impressive 10-pointed star, but if you try to close at F16 and beyond it comes out gorgeous, but you lose sharpness, so here comes into play a nice multiexposure with F11 base and Recovery F16 stars. In the daytime I love it and I never take it out of the car so much that I decided to buy a Fujifilm x-e2 leaving it fixed. For many the sharpness is obsolete, but I prefer more this one that returns the "real" photo than the modern ones that look like photos exited from Autocad, however beautiful, but very unreal. I conclude by saying that for 40 euros is worth the expense and take home also excellent portraits. Only mole but I think it's a problem of mine, the inifinite is about 2. Once you know, go easy.
Pros:The price, the blur, bright colors, in the macro photos
Cons:being an analog lens and used on digital camera you have to settle.
Opinion:I did a lot of research before buying this goal. Found on EBAY at a ridiculous price I decided to take it, the idea of ??using an analogue lens on a digital camera made me very puzzled but once I tried I was amazed. landscape photography, macro, portraits.very, very satisfied.
Pros:The price, the blur, the yield in the blue, and the bright colors in the macro photos
Cons:definition, given the price virtually nothing.
Opinion:It does not of course have the definition of modern lenses, but it is a lens that is fine and cheap, it is worth everything that costs and probably a little more, with nikon in macro shooting is fine, blur and good i colors are alive and lit, even with the ring with the correction for endless focus with a slight retouch you get discrete picture
Pros:From F4 onwards but without getting to exceed F11 very good sharpness. various tests made with other newly built objectives ... Regge confrontation despite ... A contrast sleeping less, due to less complete antireflection coating. The mechanical part is in old style Zeiss style.
Cons:Say .. A pinch of only TA disappointment.
Opinion:Beautiful in its aluminum livery. Mounted on a mirrorless ... from a special pleasure. I have also the older brother Sonnar 135 ... that is monstrous ... and together they are a pair magnifica.Consigliabilissimo especially if paid 30 Euros like me ... I arrived in good condition but a nice clean the lenses ... it regained 100%. The colors seem inecceppibile.Con a rollover ring or the rings allows macro superlative.Il vintage charm of Carl Zeiss. wonderful
Pros:Really awesome, I love the Zeiss optics and this jena 50mm has a blurred fabulous !!
Cons:Nobody!!
Opinion:This jena tessar 50mm is making me very entertained with a blurred fabulous and amazing colors, then on the D800E from the maximum, unfortunately I do not have much time to try more in depth but in time I want to see how it behaves on the field !! Paid 100 Euros and shipped my copy is almost new, the Giera commissioning fire is nice typical fluid zeiss !!
Opinion:I bought a perfect specimen of this lens by bit .... now is the objective that has the most beautiful I've ever seen ... blurry similar to fuzzy "bubble" Trioplan style; has a surprising nìitidezza, good even at TA, closing sharply rooms ... it returns very accurate colors, but brillanti.Una magnificent lens, at a ridiculous price.
Pros:Crystal clear, compact, very solid, very blurry, price
Cons:Ring small maf but usabilissima
Opinion:One of my favorite lenses, due to its compactness almost disappears both in the pocket and on the SLR. The sharpness is good already at 2.8 and become excellent closing of a stop ... one of the sharpest lenses vintage I've ever tried. It 'also very solid, if it falls to the ground is able to be broken on the floor! RnPer fifty € specimens are in excellent condition, for 30-40 € we will take home pieces with some damage or ailment (seeds nuts -bloccate, dust, mold ... maybe). I have paid 55 and the buy back definitely!
Pros:Excellent yield in the blue (typical of Zeiss). Excellent sharpness (from f / 4).
Cons:No One
Opinion:A great lens vintage.rnUtilizzato system on m4 / 3 offe angle fields equivalent of 100mm. The sharpness becomes absolute in games to f / 4 while TA is not performing as the twin Planar f / 1,7.rnLa color rendering is amazing especially in the "blue" and had to desaturate often even the sky, above all in the high mountains. rnSfocato really pleasant. rn
Pros:Blurred pleasant, sharpness, exceptional close up if I reverse a macro is scary. The yield good returns, I would say that the actual colors of the shot.
Cons:At a price of 30 euro I would say nothing
Opinion:Now I have this lens for about a year, I can say that it was the best purchase I have made. sharp already wide open to the best of f8, which means great for travel weighs just all metal, neutral color rendering some call it cold, but returns the actual colors of the shot. I am using it for portraits, close up and macro and where really good. Downsides might be the maf manual, but for others it could be a pro, I recommend it to everyone when we do not have the deadlifts from the body. I use it on Canon 600d adapters cost a little more than ten euro d.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
