JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Accurate construction, good sharpness, flare resistance
Cons:Vignetting
Opinion:That's a good goal. I often use it on M7 with bn film and provides notable results. Maybe at the full opening it cartoons a little. Filters I can't fit. But, even in relation to the price, I find it absolutely advisable. A question for the Leicists: on M10 (or M9) with that coding you use it, Tri-Elmar or 21 f2.8 preasph.? Or without coding? Does anyone know if it is possible to mount a codoified bayonet (and by whom)? Thank you
Pros:Dimensions, detail definition, mechanics, ability to use screw filters.
Cons:Vignette, hard to get bokeh,
Opinion:I've been using it for six months now, with great satisfaction. Compact, robust and precise mechanical lens without electronics. Beautiful feeling of control in the regular fire, very precise the diaphragm diaphragm (which works in increments of 1/2 stop) Immense depth of field, which allows you to have everything in focus almost to any diaphragm. The counteraltar is that if you want to blend the background, unless you use a helicoid, you go crazy. Very saturated colors and excellent contrast, even in situations with heavy backlight. At the moment I have never felt particularly need to use a polarizer. Convenient and effective the built-in lampshade, but not being possible to remove it, you can not use slab filters. However, the front lens that does not protrude allows you to use screw ones. Superb sharpness from TA to the center. I find it very good even at the edges, at least my specimen. Excellent across the frame from f5.6 onwards. I didn't notice any particular distortions. You have to take care to keep the lenses very clean. Given the high detail and the wide range of focus, small points of dirt, which on other lenses would disappear, are clearly visible on the frame even at TA. Marked the vignette, even with closed diaphragm. However, it can be corrected in post-production.
Pros:Lightness, lightness, lightness, value for money
Cons:Virtually no one, except slight vignette, more than manageable and the impossibility of using slab filters.
Opinion:Practical and light; good definition, even at the edges, from 5.6; low distortion; Usually for the pushed panoramas I use a zeiss 15 away on the D850 but if I have to travel, walk a lot I prefer to use a nikon Z6 with this lens; at f8 the differences are not relevant and not entirely justified by the difference in weight/price. The built-in lampshade is convenient, but in fact it requires to use only one circular filter and not the slab ones, which are essential for having graduated effects.
Pros:Build Quality, sharpness on almost all the frame already a TA, compact dimensions, good resistance to flare, screw filters from 58mm.
Cons:Vignette and not a little. A little purple fringing. The VM version does not have the de-click function on the E.
Opinion:It's a wonderous lens. So Compact that it can be kept in your pocket. Built with a wonderful metal body and integrated lens hood not detachable. I have Not noticed virtually any distortion and for a 15mm I find it extraordinary. Pretty Sharp already at TA (f/4.5) on almost any frame except the end of the edges just a soft thread. Damn well Resists to flare, definitely better than my Nikon 16-35 F4 and 20 1.8 G. Having 10 diaphragm blades produces beautiful and razor-sharp 10-beam stares. Add the possibility of using screw filters, maybe 58mm slim, and you will have a must for landscape and architecture to always keep and I always say in the bag.
Pros:Size, quality of construction, minimal distortion, color rendering, built-in hood.
Cons:Small ring for focusing, 4.5 maximum aperture, slight chromatic aberration in specific conditions, on average crisp.
Opinion:A lens with Ultrawide minima.Piccola distortion, solid and well costruita.Non splits the hair, but at the same time not kneads immagini.Date its dimensions and points of view that if they can get, I keep staring into zaino.rnUtilizzo III version leica-nex adapter on a7s2.rnCostata about 300 euro.rnLa new version should be engraved and should have eliminated the cromatiche.rnNon aberrations is no reason not to own it.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
