RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Tokina AT-X PRO 28-70mm f/2.8 : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Tokina AT-X PRO 28-70mm f/2.8)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


user61502
avatarjunior
sent on October 13, 2016

Pros: Tokina typical construction: indestructible! Petal hood effectively. Price flea. amazing optical quality even at TA.

Cons: For what it costs sincerely anyone.

Opinion: Angenieux zoom built on a project from which Tokina bought the license, excellent optical quality and amazing build quality. Sharp, saturated colors in the right place without overdoing it and without "screaming". Heavy compared to optical plasticky today, but being built entirely of metal could not be diversamente.rnRestituisce balanced picture and pleasant to work in PP. Truly recommended for those looking for a handyman with excellent optical zoom and quality construction at a price abbordabilissimo (150.00 / 250.00 Euros depending on conditions). I challenge anyone to distinguish photos taken with this perspective by comparing them to 28-70mm2.8 / 24-70mm2.8 other manufacturers from the stratospheric price. Seeing is believing. To buy absolutely.

avatarjunior
sent on September 26, 2016

Pros: solid, bright

Cons: flare, chromatic aberrations, weight

Opinion: Taken a few months ago version 2.6 - 2.8, and used on Eos 60D. The first impression is stunning: Solid as a rock (although age has a sign) ... and just as heavy. More than the absolute weight the problem comes from the fact that it is quite unbalanced towards the front lens, and then the long tends to tire wrists and fingers. It is probably more suited to heavier SLR as a 5D or 7D. Optically risolvenza has a good (though not great), especially if closed at least f4.0. A TA is a bit 'soft, with a decrease in contrast. The AF is fast enough and with few uncertainties, but a little 'noisy. Suffer from flare enough, as many Tokina lenses, and also chromatic aberrations are sometimes present (like many of the objectives in its class). They are still marginal defects, avoidable with a little 'attention in the composition of your shot and a few clicks in postproduction. Altogether a lens with good value / prezzo.rnrnPS. onlla my 60D does not seem perfectly compatible with the live view, often not being able to connect with the subject, especially at the minimum distance.

avatarsenior
sent on February 11, 2016

Pros: A bomb, sturdy, durable, all-metal, blunt object for some aspects! Crisp at rt, quick and precise af, although with little light is a bit uncertain in some situations.

Cons: It weighs, but it is the price to pay for a lens made of war trial

Opinion: Weight: expression that kids of our day use to express astonishment at something amazing. but it is also the aprola that is used to refer to the "weight" (proper) of an object. I think it's the right adjective: a very good optics, with enviable optical design, sharp in any situation, even at room temperature, fast and accurate af, a little uncertain twilight (but is there). Solid and eternal. for what it costs then !! (Recommended 2.6-2.8 version as a first choice, alternatively 2.8 to 77mm diameter filters, 72 leave him, is not up)

user5755
avatarsenior
sent on March 02, 2013

Pros: Although dated a lens is perfectly suited to digital on both FF APS-C. It has a fast and accurate autofocus, offers a saturated hue without domination. Sharp at all apertures, f 4 I think it is great. Made all in metal and glass lenses, the weight feels even if compact. rn

Cons: Af slightly noisy, slight vignetting at f 2.8, alcuen aberazioni color, weight for its size.

Opinion: Purchased used to € 160 just to try (quotes ranging from € 150 to € 230 per copy in excellent condition). Designed for film adapts well to digital FF rnLo use with satisfaction of Nikon D7000, I have not regretted the purchase even if a little long, offers saturated colors with the presence of some color aberazioni solved with good results in PP. Virtually absent distortions or little evidenti.rnHa autofocus quickly and accurately but slightly noisy, the zoom is smooth. Pleasant to the touch of all metal. I can only recommend it for those with a low cost to access a bright lens and quality that offers excellent results.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me