JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness from f5.6 to f11. Granite construction. Pasty colors "old style". AF fairly fast. Nice and gradual Bokeh. Price ... for what it costs is a bargain !!!
Cons:A TA is soft, especially on edges, vignette and contrast loses. Flare tendency with strong light sources in the corners of the frame ... Anything, however, quite soluble in PP. MF macho. Optics, for me, does not fit highly pixelated sensors.
Opinion:A slow-to-know lens to make the defects become precious. Among the many existing versions I took that PRO I for the Japanese domestic market (it is 2.8 instead of 2.6-2.8 as that for the other markets ... but it is the same goal in all respects) with screwdriver and black paint satin (like that of the photo above), which is said to come from the Ingenieux. For about 300 €, including customs and shipping costs, I took a rugged lens like a tank. The colors, of course, are less contrasted with the new models but for me it is an advantage, especially if it works well in PP.rnThe best one gives it to 28 and 35. AT TA loss of contrast and sharpness is remarkable. From 50 onwards it is best to close at least at f5.6 for greater clarity and avoid vignetting. Not always under control, especially if UV filters are used, but with some attention you remedy. rnIf you do not have a high budget and if you can do without the '24', it's really highly recommended% 21 If you can not live with the flou effect at TA and you want a blade even at 2.8 ... just pay the quadruple for a used 24-70! I switch to the Nikon 24-70 2.8G in the end I did .... and the Nikon is on another planet, especially as sharpness (and whoever says the opposite has never tried the Nikon)! Rn
user61502
sent on October 13, 2016
Pros:Tokina typical construction: indestructible! Petal hood effectively. Price flea. amazing optical quality even at TA.
Cons:For what it costs sincerely anyone.
Opinion:Angenieux zoom built on a project from which Tokina bought the license, excellent optical quality and amazing build quality. Sharp, saturated colors in the right place without overdoing it and without "screaming". Heavy compared to optical plasticky today, but being built entirely of metal could not be diversamente.rnRestituisce balanced picture and pleasant to work in PP. Truly recommended for those looking for a handyman with excellent optical zoom and quality construction at a price abbordabilissimo (150.00 / 250.00 Euros depending on conditions). I challenge anyone to distinguish photos taken with this perspective by comparing them to 28-70mm2.8 / 24-70mm2.8 other manufacturers from the stratospheric price. Seeing is believing. To buy absolutely.
Opinion:Taken a few months ago version 2.6 - 2.8, and used on Eos 60D. The first impression is stunning: Solid as a rock (although age has a sign) ... and just as heavy. More than the absolute weight the problem comes from the fact that it is quite unbalanced towards the front lens, and then the long tends to tire wrists and fingers. It is probably more suited to heavier SLR as a 5D or 7D. Optically risolvenza has a good (though not great), especially if closed at least f4.0. A TA is a bit 'soft, with a decrease in contrast. The AF is fast enough and with few uncertainties, but a little 'noisy. Suffer from flare enough, as many Tokina lenses, and also chromatic aberrations are sometimes present (like many of the objectives in its class). They are still marginal defects, avoidable with a little 'attention in the composition of your shot and a few clicks in postproduction. Altogether a lens with good value / prezzo.rnrnPS. onlla my 60D does not seem perfectly compatible with the live view, often not being able to connect with the subject, especially at the minimum distance.
Pros:A bomb, sturdy, durable, all-metal, blunt object for some aspects! Crisp at rt, quick and precise af, although with little light is a bit uncertain in some situations.
Cons:It weighs, but it is the price to pay for a lens made of war trial
Opinion:Weight: expression that kids of our day use to express astonishment at something amazing. but it is also the aprola that is used to refer to the "weight" (proper) of an object. I think it's the right adjective: a very good optics, with enviable optical design, sharp in any situation, even at room temperature, fast and accurate af, a little uncertain twilight (but is there). Solid and eternal. for what it costs then !! (Recommended 2.6-2.8 version as a first choice, alternatively 2.8 to 77mm diameter filters, 72 leave him, is not up)
user5755
sent on March 02, 2013
Pros:Although dated a lens is perfectly suited to digital on both FF APS-C. It has a fast and accurate autofocus, offers a saturated hue without domination. Sharp at all apertures, f 4 I think it is great. Made all in metal and glass lenses, the weight feels even if compact. rn
Cons:Af slightly noisy, slight vignetting at f 2.8, alcuen aberazioni color, weight for its size.
Opinion:Purchased used to € 160 just to try (quotes ranging from € 150 to € 230 per copy in excellent condition). Designed for film adapts well to digital FF rnLo use with satisfaction of Nikon D7000, I have not regretted the purchase even if a little long, offers saturated colors with the presence of some color aberazioni solved with good results in PP. Virtually absent distortions or little evidenti.rnHa autofocus quickly and accurately but slightly noisy, the zoom is smooth. Pleasant to the touch of all metal. I can only recommend it for those with a low cost to access a bright lens and quality that offers excellent results.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
