JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:It is a lens that must be learned to use, but gives results really ottimi.rnPerò who buys and who buys macro lenses in general should know that the best pictures are in the early morning. So you do not think you do not wake up at dawn instead as I did. Unfortunately for this reason I used only half.
Opinion:Great macro lens for not pushing, very light, ideal for the free hand, especially on aps-c is really convenient. Acting on a short coat but does his duty. The autofocus is lost too often but basically only use manual focus, so it is not a significant problem. To the end where you enter it is really valid. For macro acclimatized we can also open almost at room temperature and is always a razor, provided you hit the parallelism.
Opinion:Third optical tamron in my possession .... Blessed be the day that I bought to "game" the 28-75.rnPremesso that the price is definitely a strong point in relation to the optical quality, sharpness is at staggering levels already in Ta. rnUtilizzata also for portraits thanks to vc.rnUnico defect: af slow in low light, I find it difficult in some occasions in focus but deeply concerned with a view unlike any other, and that deserves to be studied properly given its limiter setting fuoco.rnSicuramente is not a goal for amateurs at first weapons but, once you learn its characteristics, returns pictures of a quality disarmante.rnPeso on nikon d750 ... sometimes I wonder ... " but I mounted? ". rnMi only regret not having bought before, that goal should never miss in your backpack.
Pros:Sharpness, Price, Price-quality ratio, weight, dimensions Contained, Fluidity ring Focus
Cons:Large Focus Breathing while in 1: 1, AF did not live in conditions of imperfect light, Construction, VC is not perfect
Opinion:I bought to replace the Nikon 105G that was too big and heavy to carry around as a specialist lens Tamron and I must say this is not all bad: definitely worth the money it costs, especially when purchased used. Sharp as the 105, costs half, weighs less, is smaller and it is a joy to use. Unfortunately I understand it very difficult if not impossible to make the focus stacking due to marcatissimo focus breathing that near 1: 1 so it changes the focal length of a few mm while varying the focus; I know it is a common failing of IF but I think here is very marked. Also when you exit from the sunlight filled the AF starts to go back and forth despite the limiters, and the VC is certainly not to the levels of NIkon VR: I have detected more than 1.5 stops compensation and have a steady hand . For the rest, apart from a building a bit 'creaky which happens to be one step below the already plasticky Nikon Professional, it is a must have soprattutto for value for money. A final praise goes to the fluidity of the ring focus, basically the use now always in MF because it's really a pleasure to focus manually.
Cons:until now no one, except for the problem that I have listed below
Opinion:Mine is not an opinion, even if the first shots, my impression is that the most favorable, is a request made to those who can rispondere.rnOggi I received the lens in question, and I started to "play". To my amazement I was not able to open up to 2.8, but I stopped and 3 / 3.5 ---------- RNLA my SLR is the nikon d90- rnMi I start to worry about the validity of lens purchased or is a technical problem of the light. rnGrazie and excuse my intrusion. rnMauro
Pros:sharpness (including TA), stabilizer, speed AF in good light conditions, build quality, price
Cons:AF slower in low light conditions.
Opinion:A lens that great satisfaction, if you know how to use. The sharpness is perfect even at RT. Great for portraits, macro, landscape, sports. Excellent and useful limiters distance to the focus. The stabilizer does its work very bene.rnLa focus misfires in low luminosità.rnPer its price, it's a great goal.
Opinion:After trying the old version and its quality (but also its painfully slow AF) and confidant of Tamron enhancements with new technologies USD and VC (I already had the 70-300 vc usd) I was convinced and I did not regret the purchase. Immediately became my favorite lens, on Eos 60 d sharpness is already very good at f 2.8 (and gets impressive from f4), the stabilizer is useful for portraits (and in some cases even a little help in macros) and AF although slightly + slow of USM 15-85 is adequate for a macro lens, and absolutely accurate even in low light. Definitely a product got it right, with little to envy to 100 l (I've got to try) but with 50% less cost. Update-use on Eos M5: after upgrading the firmware I was able to use it even on the M5. Here the AF speed is slightly reduced and especially more inaccurate in non-optimal lighting conditions. Usable but definitely better out of reflex.
Opinion:After a long meditation (100L Canon or Tamron VC 90?) My pockets have decided for the Tamron ... and I'm not sorry! Well built, it returns a razor sharp image! it was love at first ... click! The 'Af is accurate (though not very fast, even with the focus limiter) and stabilization helps .. well Straconsigliato!
Cons:If I have to be very (VERY) finicky autofocus can be a bit 'sketchy on small distances, but has never been a problem.
Opinion:My first macro perspective: I think it's the best choice I could do, never disappoints me, there is a photo that I can not do with him. The autofocus is very fast and accurate, (the limit is back and forth a few times, mostly over short distances, but always catches us), absolutely quiet. The stabilizer does its job except with slow shutter speeds: in that case I HAVE to turn it off or the photo has to be thrown away because of the rough but do not consider it a bad thing, who needs stabilization on the stand? The sharpness is excellent, even in 100% crops without closing the diaphragm, if I try to close it ... it becomes a thing out of my head, sharp enough to hurt. In addition, it maintains its size, not like the previous 90 2.8. It is a view to which they are satisfied 200%.
Pros:- Value very much competitiva.rnImmagini nitide.rn
Cons:Nn autofocus is very fast.
Opinion:Result in sharp image that I think has a definition eccezionale.rnIl your purchase has replaced Tammy without VC. Mah .. I'm not quite sure of the difference. I have tested initially but nn being was stunned, I stopped her (by now I had changed!). I find than however unlike the other there are positives to justify the higher price and also the "emotional detachment" on the other with which I am passionate about the macro. In smooth gave me a little 'bother the recess of the barrel for the transition to manual. This is solid, and everything is built better. rnsono exact matches, but I've never tried that nn Nikon optics that would have taken if it had not been for those nn almost 2 ounces more. Above 500 gr. I "accuse" the weight negatively.
Cons:Stabilizer almost useless, not great aurofocus
Opinion:Good lens in every aspect base: construction, handling, nititezza, brightness, weight, price and so on. Going instead to evaluate the stabilizer is not great. my specimen has a sharp front of the menu, which I correct focus SLR with a +12 and I honestly do not feel like sending it in for service. Well suited for portraits where the 2.8 on a 90mm by soddisfazioni.Ora really nice considering it was designed to do macro VC and AF are not important to me. I think it is the best compromise price / performance. However, I would live in quiet even with the old model.
Cons:the stabilizzazzione, at least mine even at a distance of 5 or 6 feet are not the best.
Opinion:I had the first type (the one that stretched). This is optically excellent, unfortunately my proven stabilizzazzione conrnrnil canon 24-105 in the same focal length, it is not at the level of the canon, and it is for this reason that my vote is not the best I expected a lot more, nothing rnrnper optics to say excellent as always, silent autofocus, and veloce.rn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
