RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on May 22, 2023

Pros: Sharpness, versatility, lightness.

Cons: The button to lock the zoom to 70mm is missing, not stabilized.

Opinion: It is a lightweight lens, essential if you want to carry around little weight (with the A7C 1 kg total). Excellent for the landscape, pleasant blurred. If you walk with the camera around your neck the zoom extends by force of gravity, the lock button would have been comfortable. However, for that weight I can not complain about anything.

avatarjunior
sent on January 22, 2023

Pros: Sharpness and compactness

Cons: obviously it's a bit dark

Opinion: My favorite super zoom lens, tropicalized and not excessively heavy or bulky (15cm) the plasticous feeling is not a problem for me, the lens is precise and fast even on old machines like mine, a7ii .... obviously it needs a camera body with stabilization that comes into play very willingly at very high focal lengths such as the 300 It should be used with a good amount of light, unfortunately as soon as the brightness drops you rediscover all the limits of a lens so dark, but for me remains the only defect other lenses cost crazy figures and for what I do this lens is fine

avatarjunior
sent on November 21, 2022

Pros: Lightweight, functional lens performing enough for my needs.

Cons: Not very bright.

Opinion: I bought it for its lightness, price, and because I do not use it continuously. I have a Nikon z7ii and I mainly take landscape photos and from this point of view I am well covered with a Nikon z 14-30 and a Nikon z 24-120, two excellent very valid and performing lenses. I needed a longer lens in case I needed it. the nikon z 70 200 and 100 400 are unapproachable for me for their price circus 3000 euros and for the weight, therefore, having already had on the D850 and D750 Tamron lenses and having found myself well I opted for this 70 300, which although not stabilized, uses the stabilizer of the sensor of the Z7ii.Da first shots seems very valid for the type of need I have, I recognize and limits and defects, but at the moment I am satisfied with it and it corresponds to what I was looking for.

avatarjunior
sent on August 29, 2022

Pros: Focal excursion price

Cons: No stabilization

Opinion: Good economic lens lightweight, compact and versatile . Great for those who are very attentive to weight, bulk and price. Unusable at full excursion for non-stabilized bodies, already on a7iv for videos or long exposure shots you feel the lack of optical stabilization, for everything else instead it is perfect.

avatarsenior
sent on December 11, 2021

Pros: Light - tropicalized

Cons: Stabilization Absent

Opinion: The Tamron 70/300 is the perfect lens, in my opinion, for the kind of photos I like to take and felt the need for. I waited a long time before choosing it and I think I made the right choice. I must say that my first choice was the Sigma 100/400 but then the price, size and weight made me start looking at the Tamron with more insistence. As soon as I tried the Tamron, I immediately realized that I had made the right choice, because it has the qualities I wanted, that is, lightness and compactness that allow you to walk comfortably, and have photos of excellent quality in my opinion. The only thing that worried me was the lack of the stabilizer, but, mounting the lens on my Sony a7II stabilized even at 300 mm you can photograph quietly. In conclusion, therefore, the Tamron is an excellent lens with a truly excellent price quality suitable for all those who seek in particular lightness and compactness at a truly competitive price.

avatarsenior
sent on July 09, 2021

Pros: very compact. Very good yield.

Cons: Upgrading FW only through the purchase of a dock (if I understand correctly)

Opinion: I waited for it to drop in price and took it to just over 400€ with European guarantee. Lightweight lens (plastic but good quality), brightness not sensational, but with ultraluminous lenses you can navigate on very different sizes (and very different prices). Not generally doing avifauna, but details of landscapes and architectures, the large apertures of diaphragm are not important to me, so I'm fine. At 300 mm it stretches a lot, practically doubles the length, but does not give the impression of "disassembling". It has no buttons and controls, so the focus settings must be done from the machine menu. I remember that the lens is not equipped with stabilizer, but uses (if it exists) that of the machine, but to demand a stabilized optics at this price would seem to me really too much. The focus is quick, quiet and precise, without hesitation. I have not yet done the usual tests at all the diaphragms, but I only tried it in the field: it seemed sharp in all situations, with a nice saturation of colors. Tested on Sony A7II. The only negative note is the firmware update, which I understand is only possible by purchasing a dock station. I already have that Samyang, I wouldn't want to make the collection. But is it possible that you can not provide a usb port on the lens, or the possibility of updating from the machine, as it happens with native optics?

avatarsupporter
sent on April 20, 2021

Pros: Compactness and lightness. Value for money

Cons: Low brightness. No stabilization.

Opinion: It is a good goal, well designed and realized, despite the use of plastic material. The low brightness and the absence of stabilization are the prices to pay to have a compact and light goal. It already has excellent full-aperture performance, so an f/6.3 at 300 mm allows good shots in most light conditions. I use it with Sony a7r2 and a6000. With the stabilized sensor does not make you feel the lack of stabilization. Good autofocus speed. Slight loss of sharpness at the edges at the extreme focal points. If you want a pushed zoom, light and versatile, it is a good solution.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me