|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.user9483   | sent on December 01, 2023 Pros: Sharpness, robustness, build quality Cons: Weight, autofocus Opinion: Bought used on RCE, lens in very good condition. Used on Nikon D750 and D810 SLRs. On the first one the AF is slightly more responsive, while on the D810 it was a bit slower. I got rid of the SLR system to switch to ML with the Z6, adapting the Tamron with the help of the FTZII adapter. Things are improved, AF more responsive than using with previous SLRs. The sharpness of the glasses of this lens is beyond question, there is a lot of quality! Soft and smooth movement rings. The positive note is the integrated lens hood, once the cap is removed the lens is ready to use without having to worry about anything else. Weight and stability bearable on reflex cameras, as the balance between the two bodies, camera/lens is almost good. Mounted on the Z6 + FTZII things have changed. The excessive weight of the Tamron 15-30 (about 1.1 Kg.) compared to the camera body makes it a bit complicated to manage the equipment in question handheld. Recently I decided to sell it, also because the tendons in my shoulders have been worn out for a long time. Replaced with the 24-70 f/4 Z and I have to say things have improved by far. Of course, I lost a bit of mm. on the widest focal length, as well as an aperture stop. Basically, I can be very satisfied, both with this lens, but more generally with Tamron products, which today are a tough competitor to deal with. |
 | sent on November 30, 2023 Pros: The lens works well Cons: Not very serious company, I will never buy a Tamron again in my life Opinion: I used the lens with reflex and it worked well, but with Nikon's Z system the autoffocus did not work, I asked for assistance, Designed to make it compatible with Nikon's Z system they asked me € 280 + 20 per shipment, these are crazy, think carefully before buying a tamron lenses, I for my part do not even want to hear about tamron. |
 | sent on November 05, 2022 Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer. Cons: None apart from the fact of the cap on the hood that does not disassemble, tropicalization absent, it is not possible to mount filters. Opinion: Having a childhood friend who owns a photography shop, I have the opportunity to try many lenses, the lens in question I tried on Canon 6D and I can only speak well of this glass. The weight....... certainly you can not have the "full barrel and the drunken wife", if I have to be honest I would have preferred 5 mm more maybe sacrificing the 15 mm, if Tamron had built a lens equal to this, with a constant 16-35 excursion f / 2.8 I would have preferred it. The only defect that in my opinion (if we want to call it a defect) is the rubber cap that covers the hood that remains fixed. Another flaw that is not tropicalized. The quality/price ratio is great. |
  | sent on October 21, 2022 Pros: Stabilization, sharpness, contrast Cons: Flare, weight, size, inability to screw filters Opinion: Got and resold. The lens itself is not bad bad but you have to get used to its weight. If you plan to always use it on a tripod it is great but if you have to take it on the road it starts to weigh as much as two average lenses, 1.1kg are many, both if you put them on a machine with good grip like a Canon 5D and on smaller machines but with less grip like an R6. The stabilization and sharpness are good, minus the behavior with light sources such as the Sun in the frame. It is impossible to mount screw filters which makes plate filters necessary, inconvenient and uneconomical for me. Resold for the Canon 16-35 f/4 L IS as sharper, lighter, compact in the backpack, similar stabilizer and possibility of mounting 77mm filters |
 | sent on October 29, 2021 Pros: Solid construction, sharpness, low distortion, insignificant aberrations, weight, superior optical quality, stabilization Cons: No screw filters Opinion: I took this perspective without expecting amazing things, despite the many positive comments. I use it manually on the Lumix S1. What can I say.. a truly incredible goal. The optical quality is very high already at full aperture, it reaches the best from 5.6 onwards. Sharp throughout the frame, very good details and incisiveness, contained distortion and almost absent in the plane, aberrations very well controlled on highlights and backlight .. I thought I didn't have to change my mind, but I did. I am happily amazed by this lens and just in the focal lengths that I love the most .. I recommend it to anyone and I believe that the new version has been improved in terms of AF speed and robustness. I use it manually, with relative calm. On the 24mp sensor of the S1 it is perfect. When needed, it has excellent stabilization. I forgot, among the merits I also put the weight. The optical quality weighs, and it is good, and the feeling of use that returns a glass like this is unique. |
 | sent on September 18, 2021 Pros: Optical quality, focal range, known mirrorless compatibility. Good VC although not of the latest generation. Cons: Tropicalization absent, astrophotography is not his favorite field (inferior to Nikon), but it is still a 15 mm f2.8. Opinion: I am an advanced amateur photographer, I have always dreamed of owning a quality wide angle, thanks to this Tamron I have achieved peace of mind. In the past I orbited the wide-angle planet thanks to the Samyang 14mm f2.8 and the Nikon 20-35 mm f2.8, lenses that I bought and resold due to dissatisfaction. The Tamron 15-30 mm f2.8 G1 gravitates right near another star. The sharpness at the edges is extraordinary, clearly not up to a more noble Zeiss Distagon from 4000 euros, but analyzing the files I immediately realized that I had in my hands a lens that allows me to express the artistic vein without compromise, even at the most extreme focal length. At full aperture at 15mm the distortion is pronounced, but it makes no sense to talk about it, since I will never fall below f5.6 when collecting a landscape document. At f14 the distortion is noticeable only in the extreme corners of the frame, if there is now a complex object, while the vignetting is imperceptible. The curvature of the field is less pronounced on this lens at 15mm, than it is at 24mm that of the Tamron 24-70 mm f2.8 G1. I owned this last lens, and as good as it is, I consider it inferior to its wide-angle G1 brother. Tamron in fact gives to the very small focal lengths a greater attention than that which it gives to the other two components of the classical triad. The picture is completed by a fast, silent and precise AF, characteristics, these, that I find in all the USD. The only reason why the G2 descendant is superior to him is tropicalization. Although the G1 is also isolated, I will be careful not to expose it even to the slightest rain. Let's also not forget that the lens under consideration is the only one among the G1 to be compatible with Mirrorless systems, which is no small thing given that its latest Achilles heel, the first generation stabilizer, would be elevated to perfection by a possible mirrorless IBIS. Finally, the weight of this lens is truly remarkable, but the quality at 15 mm is paid. It is not a lens suitable for situations of extreme climbing, for the rest, those who want to amaze with landscapes, strengthen their back with passion, and carry it with them at the cost of feeling their legs give way. Lens that therefore requires a good ball head. While I was making the last point, I remember not mentioning one of the outstanding merits: the focal range. The reason why many professionals choose Tamron wide angles lies in the extra 6mm offered on the normal side. Delighted. |
 | sent on September 06, 2020 Pros: Sharpness. Value for money Cons: Weight. Cold color yield Opinion: I came from Nikon lenses and I was looking for a reliable optics that covered the focal lengths that I use the most and hence the choice of this goal. I took it a couple of times to the mountains and I have to say that paired with the D750 gave me great satisfaction. As I am used to I do not feel very well with the rendering of colors, perhaps too defined and cold compared to the Nikon that have a more pasty and warm rendering. Anyone who says that after mounting it no longer removes it I understand... Main new: weight. Paired with FX it splits your neck so much that eper comfortable outings I took a Nikon 28mm series D |
 | sent on January 13, 2020 Pros: Sharpness, brightness, excellent focal range, construction, stabilization, overall quality, sharpness, vignette and reduced aberrations, colors Cons: I would say nothing particularly relevant and that was not known at the time of purchase: weight, clutter, impossibility to use vine filters and some flares Opinion: After 5 months of use on the d750 I am really satisfied with the expense and the excellent value for money of this lens. Convenient focal range, always very sharp even at TA, af that hardly misses a shot, constructive quality and excellent stabilization. Among the flaws (but I knew it already before I bought it), the weight, the footprint and the impossibility of mounting screw filters. |
 | sent on December 17, 2019 Pros: Solid construction, sharpness, VC, value for money Cons: Nobody Opinion: Taken for a few months to use on d800 I was fully satisfied. Aesthetically I like it very much, at the first contact in the hand you immediately feel its good solidity, the gravels are quite fluid and precise and using it with care not even the protruding aspheric front lens puts too much "anxiety". The weight is quite important but it goes hand in hand with its really impressive sharpness in the center, slightly less sharp at the edges but I would say that it is so minimal the thing that you do not even notice it. Autofocus is very fast and precise and although the focus is quite short I do not deny that often the VC is useful and does its job in a very good way allowing even freehand shots at 1/10 without problems of chore or micro moved. and on d800 this is a success I would say :D You can only use it with holder and 150x150 slab filters that cost a lot, but I wouldn't define it as a problem this, since when you take this lens you put this in quote too, otherwise you change pattern by veering on lenses that can mount screw filters. The value for money I think is exceptional by placing this lens among the best widecorners now on the market on par with brands and lenses that are much more embossed. |
 | sent on May 14, 2019 Pros: Sharpness at the center-stabilizer-optical quality of the absolute level (absent aberrations, distortion, coma and vignetting well controlled-price Cons: Edge sharpness-Flare-Build quality Opinion: Excellent lens, definitely the one I most loved about Nikon attack (proven on D750). Build quality: 8/10 Although well built for materials and couplings and solid, it has a touch something that puts it a step below the corresponding zoom of the most emblazoned brands (Sony, Nikon, Canon, we do not speak Zeiss). Weight and size for me have never been a problem, I knew what I was buying and that on the wide angle the quality you pay. As well as the use of slab filters for me is a merit: it is a gesture for me beautiful to assemble the holder and work with the filters... Sure they were 100mm to save something would be better, but you can't have it all... AUTOFOCUS (10/10) As far as it can serve on a super wide angle, excellent, practically perfect for reliability, accuracy and speed. I only had some problems with manual focus, especially at night, but I think it is to be attributed to the photographer more than the lens. Image quality (9/10) Very comfortable focal Range that made me often carry it back as the sole goal. VR that helps to compensate the weight in the freehand shots. Excellent sharpness already from the whole opening in the center. My specimen lost a bit ' to the edges as to sharpness and resolution, but only appreciable in prints really extra large. Nothing dramatic, but still present. I could not compare it seriously with other lenses of other brands, but from what little I could see other models even more noble if they pass worse. It suffers from flare, but more than a defect is a feature of super wide lenses, and apparently suffers less than colleagues from other brands. PRICE (10/10) I think there is no better in circulation as a value for money. Since the G2 (optically and mechanically identical) came out this is in the used market at very advantageous prices, if you look for a lens with these features I think it is a "Best Buy" |
 | sent on December 03, 2018 Pros: Sharpness and great value for money. Cons: I don't feel like giving... Opinion: If you want a wide angle zoom with an aperture and a sharpness of the genre you can not fall into the dimensions and the weight; I fell in love with this lens before seeing the Iscatti and then using it almost as the only lens on a Full Frame. I think it has very little to envy as a surrender to large wide-angle mothers houses: sharp on almost the entire image, already good at full aperture, given away simply to change the system... Large and durable, an excellent travel companion: The biggest flaw is the need for a special filter holder and as a result of a set of dedicated filters that is fine until you only usan those, but becomes a footprint if you also use other lenses... |
 | sent on December 02, 2018 Pros: I'm evaluating it with tests. Cons: Focus problems, little incisive. Opinion: I have purchased this 10-day lens for my Nikon D610. After the first shots I noticed immediately sharpness problems right on the point of focus and various distances from the subject. I did some tests on the possible back-front focus problem but I can't correct this focus problem. I'il send it for replacement tomorrow. I hope it is only a problem of this specimen maybe defective factory. |
 | sent on November 15, 2018 Pros: Excellent goal, for the surrender it offers, for its sharpness and resolve. Cons: It does not go unnoticed, for the mole and the weight. Opinion: I've been using it for about 1 year on a Nikon D750 and it's giving me great satisfaction. For the landscape and the night photos is a Mr Objective as the most noble. In landscape photos I use it with holder and filters ND and GND Haida Nano Pro with excellent results. Recently it came out in new G2, but I think that with this VC there are no major differences in the yield, so I recommend this specimen, both for the price both new and in the market and will give you certainly results of which you will be proud: |
| sent on November 05, 2018 Pros: Chromatic rendition, sharpness, resolution, absence of aberrations, great quality, price Cons: Weight? But if you want quality is the Scotto to pay Opinion: I use it with great satisfaction on d750 for about three months, what about? Great lens, sharpness and chromatic rendition exceptional, contrast and excellent colors, no aberrations, little distortion, I think that among the wide angle is the best on the market today. The only flaw perhaps the weight and the need for a specific holder to assemble the filters for those who use them. |
 | sent on September 14, 2018 Pros: Excellent sharpness/definition from 2.8, minimum CA, minimum geometric distortions, minimal vignetting, constant quality at different focal lengths, frontal lens protective treatment, fast and precise stabilizer, reasonable price/quality ratio. Cons: Size, weight, frontal lens exposed (inability to mount screw filters). Opinion: The lens is extremely sharp and performing, certainly not small and light, but for FF, while being a zoom, it competes quietly, and very often exceeds, the quality of the few high-level alternatives present on the market. Used on Canon MK-III and MK-IV for architectural work, it made me everything that needed a good result. The good quality of the images produced greatly reduces the need for PPD interventions to the benefit of the final rendering of the files. To those looking for detailed information, I leave below a couple of valid and in-depth technical reviews: https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-15-30mm-f-2.8-Di-VC-USD-Lens.aspx; https://www.cameralabs.com/tamron-sp-15-30mm-f2-8-di-vc-usd-review/ |
 | sent on August 30, 2018 Pros: Very sharp, reduced vignetting, reduced or non-existent distortion in the 15-24mm range, Mighty Cons: Weight and footprint, no screw filters, very vulnerable front lens, annoying distortion at 30mm, 15mm are only on paper Opinion: I used this lens for a few years before moving on to the Canon 16-35 f4 IS. The Tamron is really bulky, I often left it at home preferring the fixed, but when I wore it with me I was always satisfied with the shots. Compared to the aforementioned Canon, I think is sharper and much less vignette, despite being a 2.8! The 5mm of difference seem few, but sometimes they feel. The build quality doesn't look great, or better not by the feeling of robustness that give Canon's high end lenses. I recommend it to those who are particularly oriented to these focal lengths, otherwise, if you have 2 or 3 other lenses in your backpack, maybe you will pass the urge and prefer something lighter. |
 | sent on June 13, 2018 Pros: Sharpness, flare, nocturnal, aperture, color Cons: Only negative: the CAP!!!!!! Then when I saw it and I bought it I joined also in the gym (a derisory against the qualities it has) Opinion: I pass by a 70d with 10 -20, after a year arrival with the 5d III and Tammy (coming from a Samyang) total indecision between 16-35/16-28 etc.... after a month I decide to take the step, crazy is to say the least! Precise, fast, what you see the photographer, Versatile..... wait a night (the time just does not love me) to pair it to the Star adventurer, if I can set everything well I'm sure that something unique comes out. It will stay with me a long time! |
 | sent on April 11, 2018 Pros: Bright, solid, stable, great image quality, accurate focusing. Great value for money. Cons: doing many night photos (and with manual focus) there is always the risk of inadvertently touching the ring. The point of MAF to infinity is, in my copy, to 15 mm, not aligned with the center of the symbol. Opinion: I got it mainly for astrophotography (and marginally for daytime landscapes). Are immediately impressed by the sharpness and the micro-images. Other lenses canon must be closed to f/5.6 or f/8 to give the same impact this lens wide open. The quality of image, side-to-side with Samyang 14 mm shows definitely a vignetting much better controlled (over 1 stop) and higher quality. Also the image distortion is more controlled and smooth. As against, I note the extreme sensitivity of the focusing ring and, in the case of my copy, a slight centering problem because the extreme edges in the left side of the frame at f/2.8 have slightly lower image quality than the the right hand side. I have to say that the thing you notice only find a lot and just wide open. The inability to easily mount the filters is not a cons, for me, since I got this lens for other purposes ... However I recognize that it would be nice if you could attach a polarizer or ND at longer focal lengths (i.e. by 24 mm onwards). The bokeh, with 30 mm shots at close range, is a bit erratic ... the subject is off well from the background, but the background remains very recognizable. Certainly the short throw doesn't help. Last but not least: the stabilizer (high ISO) allowed me to take pictures pretty much in the dark, Freehand (gust), time otherwise unthinkable (0.5 seconds and, much more rarely, up to 1 second). I suggest, as always, to be disabled for shots with camera on a tripod because I noticed that can create a small shake (visible in picture). |
 | sent on March 09, 2018 Pros: Excellent construction. Stabilized. f 2.8. Exceptional sharpness. Extraordinary AF. Cons: A bit (obviously) heavy. Impossibility to mount screw filters. Opinion: Received today and tried in night shots. Impressive, really. It has exceptional clarity. Built impeccably and with a very efficient stabilizer. It's really huge, showing all its bulk despite being mounted on a D4. But it makes us forgive, as it repays with its enormous potential. I can not wait to try astrophotography with this gem. It is a lens that should not be missing in an FF kit. Complimentoni to Tamron for these excellences. I will squeeze it during the weekend in diurnal shots.rn10 and praise. |
 | sent on February 03, 2018 Pros: Excellent in all: sharpness at all lengths and at full aperture, construction, price / quality unsurpassed, some bring it to the nikor 14-24 f2.8 which costs + double, it makes you love immediately Cons: The weight, but I knew this, so for me no one, even the not being able to use the filters Opinion: Arrived the first of January 2018 tried and I was pleasantly satisfied in all fields of use, even in difficult light conditions, good resistance to flare, for me it is almost comparable to fixed lenses, with my nikon D750 got married very well , auto focus fast and quiet, and then stabilization works great. for me vote 9.7, it would deserve 10, but I know that for many influences in the vote the weight and the use of the filters.rnI tests in this gallery: https://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=231020&l = en |
| sent on October 21, 2017 Pros: Optical, constructive quality, stabilization, openness, tropicalization Cons: Nothing .. Opinion: Wonderful, fast and silent lens, incredible quality, at the ultra-wide angle I think I have the absolute throne.rnThird ciance, tested and had a bit of everyone, from 14-24 to 16-35 nikon and even before 16-16, even the fixed ones, from the 24 sigma art to the ix 15 avuti.rnOther level.rnThe only thing that could be a negative side, I did not write it because i have not yet tested it, is that in the case of humid shots (rain / snow) in the space (the translucent lens) between the front lens and the lens hood could slip the water, so tropicalized to the contrary proof. For all the rest a must have for landscaping..rn for me vote 10.rn |
 | sent on October 16, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, Stabilization, f / 2.8, Very fast and accurate AF, well-built, tropicalized. Cons: Nothing relevant, just the size, but were known before buying. Opinion: I read a review that defines this non-character objective. I was a little surprised.rn this lens has the character to sell and returns extraordinary files. I use it on Canon 6D, i made an opposite choice to many of my friends and forum users, i gave away the EF 16-35 f / 4 of Canon to take this 15-30 f / 2.8.rnAt the beginning I was skeptical, 16-35 is a stratospheric lens, I would be satisfied with results just comparable to Canon to be satisfied with the change.rnI have also always purchased Canon lenses, I hardly buy third-party lenses, but this time I wanted to try and I was impressively impressed. "The big surprise is that the Tamron is always sharp, always open. And even more sharp than the EF 16-35 f / 4.0 I had. The tropicalization is definitely not at the Canon level, but it is still present and there is also the rubber seal on the dustproof attachment and I have never had problems with rain or humidity.rnIt is personally rimasus positively surprised and I can only recommend it to anyone who wants a great lens at all.rnrnrn |
 | sent on October 02, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, no chromatic aberration, very low edge deformation, solidity and robustness Cons: Fixed lock loop, weight, front end cap Opinion: Purchased for a few days instead of Samyang 14mm and I immediately realized the difference. Gorgeous and professional level lens has now become clear. It is a pity for the hood that is fixed because it has sneaked on me and can not be replaced if it does not go to help. Recommended for indoor or astro photography |
 | sent on October 01, 2017 Pros: Solidity, Stabilizer, Fast AF Cons: At the moment I did not find it Opinion: The optics I always wanted. It's heavy, that's true, but it's manageable without major problems. The optic by itself I find it outstanding, the sharpening is incredible. Obviously it is not a beginner's lens, not because of the difficulty that can be caused by its size, but to manage it well on a day of shots. In my opinion, a very successful lens, probably one of the best wonders currently in circulation in my opinion. I can only recommend it! |
 | sent on July 25, 2017 Pros: Nurturing, Stabilization, fast and accurate Af Cons: Nothing relevant, just a bit plasticous the barrel Opinion: I've been promoted to full marks ... after nearly a year of use I can only talk about it well. I use it with D750 and come from Nikon 16-35 f4. The difference is enormous, not so much like sharpness, almost identical, maybe better TA at the edges than Nikon, but as a rendered and chromatic loyalty. It's less contrasted with Nikon's tones more delicate but engraved as it is at the same time. It resolves significantly better than the 24 Mpx of the D750. It weighs a bit more than 16-35, but x me is not a problem. There is no tropicalization, but honestly I used it under zero, with the snow and the rain without problems ... Never wrong One shot, never disappointed.rnReceived, this review is made after almost a year of use in the most varied situations.rnThank you very much.rn agree with who said that it's a 16 or 15 ... this is true unfortunately .. We say it's a 15 and a half ... One note in my opinion is a bit stoned of this fantastic lens.rnrn |
 | sent on May 05, 2017 Pros: Few, I was expecting much more to see the price. Made immediately for something that has character Cons: It has no character. Files that are empty, empty, without a chromatic character. Opinion: I took this lens convinced of making the right choice, especially after hearing and reading exciting opinions, so I did it after twenty-four hours in favor of something that was of a character. On canon 6D is fine, it's crisp, maybe too. The files are empty, empty, without personality, without a real chromatic character, even closing the diaphragm has the feeling of always having that feeling of dissatisfaction. As if he could do more, but he did not. For me it has no character, not worth it as it costs. The building is all "fuffa", all plastic. Okay is big, huge ... and then? For me it is not worth what it costs to repeat. Better opt for lenses maybe f4 but they have an indisputable character at the chromatic level like the Canon Canon 16-35 f4 is.rnrn |
 | sent on May 05, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, 2.8, price, ease of use, rays in closed-loop sunshine Cons: 15mm almost 16, bulge weight, tamron assistance to understand, the lens easily fits in the center Opinion: I came from 14mm Samyang with whom I always found very well, I changed it because when I photographed with the sun in the scene made the rays in a bad way, the new is appreciative and from that something in the sun. Sharpness is at very high levels at the center that you have edges, compared to the Samyang 14 is much easier to use because the top floor is almost always in focus, it is difficult to explain. I bought the Haida slab system with which I find myself very well and is perfectly matched with tamron, always in comparison with the 14 has a more delicate and visually beautiful flare. I would recommend it, the only real flaw was the Tamron service which on the one hand only spends 180 euros more if it falls and destroys you on the one hand I sent back an optic after 2 months with the lenses off the axis ... so one Part was in focus one part, the left was out of focus. Votes 8 out of 10. The millimeter less than Samyang feels, though taking our hand% 26egrave; Something unimportant, another problem, which is seldom and only in some conditions is the fogging of the lens at the center and internally, so it is just waiting to be taken off, annoying problem if as I get in the good place and with the conditions Good at last;) |
 | sent on May 03, 2017 Pros: Cost - construction - sharpness Cons: weight Opinion: At first it was enthusiastic of this lens, but with the passage of time the defects are left and are importanti.rnTropicalizzazione: quite fictitious, humidity and splashing pass all right and become a big problem when the temperature changes tarnish the front lens . The only real "tamron" tropical conditions is the Pentax model that costs twice but really resistant to agents atmosferici.rnNel time (I had 2 models, one canon and nikon one) I found one of the infinite slip having to seek the assistance to recalibrate the obiettivo.rnFlare not abnormal but presente.rnRivestimento fluoride useful and well done. Worth what costarn |
  | sent on February 24, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, imperceptible distortion and vignetting nonexistent, and at zoom range. Cons: "Weight" Opinion: What a fantastic optics, building level, substantial weight but for a lens with f2.8 this hike is that impessabile albeit slight. extraordinary Niditezza already in TA but f4 becomes uniform throughout the frame. But the most impressive thing is the near absence of distortion at 15mm. And then the stabilizer that allow you to also shoot at 1/4 free hand and allow you to make creative shots with moving subjects and background in sharp focus. Great perspective, the board also for the quality / price ratio. |
 | sent on February 19, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, very low distortion, stabilizer. Cons: Size, the absence of the ring for filters, Sigma 24 35. Opinion: already possessed Sigma ART 24 35 but an opportunity has almost forced me to buy also this lens. With the two lenses available was inevitable comparazione.rnInizio with the build quality of a good standard for the Tamron but higher than that of the Sigma! The Sigma gives a feeling of strength far better than the Tamron (and in my opinion also the Nikon counterpart), also in the sigmoid rubber rings are better. Run so much smoother to the touch and the rubber quality migliore.rnCon seems a bit 'of disappointment I found the rings of the Tamron "jerky" not fluid, ditto for the tires that seem a little coarse quality' considered too low the lente.rnA performance category instead if they play almost at par, the Tamron has from its very low distortion even at the lowest focal, very natural colors and excellent contrast. Sharpness good TA that becomes excellent closing as soon as the diaphragm. rnIl sigma wins instead for a slightly better sharpness for 'entire zoom range already in TA but suffers a bit 'distortion to the lowest focal. rnDimensioni: Sigma average size but stocky Tamron mammoth. Weight: Sigma being slightly more content is strongest weight. The Tamron paradoxically "big" being distributes the weight better. I have tried them both on the D5 that perfectly balances the weight of the body machine so I believe the weight and size were not absolutely a problem for both lenti.rnMeglio Sigma or Tamron? In my opinion if you put in first place the practicality and look for a lens that allows you to have one of the most comfortable ever focal excursions for lovers of landscapes and architecture without a doubt the Tamron. rnSe however you can not help but use the filters on the lives and seek the highest possible quality by sacrificing a bit 'of focal length Sigma without thinking twice (maybe to stand alongside the 20 1.4 ART)! rnrn |
 | sent on January 25, 2017 Pros: color rendering, detail, zoom range, build quality, stabilizer Cons: Ring for filters Opinion: I bought this lens with the option of 10-year warranty. I waited a while before making a review to do before some more photos. I use a Nikon D750, I would simply say that it is the top, but obviously some defect is always present, such as lack of ability to mount the classic screw round filters, otherwise you have to choose for a bulkier sheet models and the necessity of its support. In any case it must be considered that other objectives such extreme do not have this possibility (see Nikon 14-24). The weight does not consider it a problem, if you want quality and a perspective where there is matter (lenses and layer construction) has to weigh, but in any case defects are very subjective depending on the type of use that we tend to farne.rnAltra small note, be careful to the light coming on the sides, the objective is protected by the hood but in some cases may cause some internal reflection is given that the lens is very curva.rnPer those inbut the landscapes, street and architecture photo is ottimo.rnL'ho compared with some other optical but I chose this assolutamente.rn |
 | sent on January 15, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, well corrected aberrations, contrast, stabilizer, aperture 2.8 Cons: A little heavy, but it is normal for this kind of lens Opinion: I use this lens on d750 for a year and are fully soddisfatto.rnLa sharpness is really good at all focal lengths and apertures. For astrophotography is ideal thanks to vighettatura not excessive and very well correct aberrations. rnAnche the contrast and the colors in my opinion are very belli.rnIn shots freehand in places with little light stabilizer is very useful. Often I can shoot with a time of 0.5 seconds without micromosso.rnPer against is heavy and can not be fitted screw filters, but is a problem common to all the wide-angle and pushed luminosi.rnIn conclusion excellent lens and excellent value for money . |
 | sent on January 01, 2017 Pros: Everything .... sensational Lens Cons: Gargantuan but who cares !! I would also add filters holder and quite expensive !! Opinion: I am owner of this lens for about a month ... Mounted on Canon 6d ... Coming from a Samyang 14mm upset me and changed the way of photographing landscapes !! That 's all more' clear ... More 'professional !! Almost no distortion. To make you come flare annoying you have to get commit !! Stunning sharpness even at full aperture, stabilized take pictures freehand never thought speed and aperture prim with a very wide angle ... Af lightning fast and accurate !! I really think you have used the lens of my dreams ... I love it !! |
 | sent on December 21, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, color rendering and quality / price ratio Cons: It suffers a bit low temperatures Opinion: I have this wonderful lens for four months and I must say that Tamron has really made a great lens. The only flaw I found was the lack of cold tolerance (on two occasions has formed an inner halo of the lens that has dissolved completely after 20 minutes). Ultimately a great lens with a value for money difficult to match. |
 | sent on December 13, 2016 Pros: Construction, stabilizer, nice contrast Cons: Plate filters 150mm Opinion: The texture feels and the build quality is much improved compared to other Tamron lenses. Solid and balanced, but by a lens 2.8 this must be required. If the beats very well with the Nikon 14-24 and I do not have much to envy them, each one has its pros and cons. Unfortunately for this kind of lenses are not provided screw filters because the front lens protruding, so I had to equip with a plate filters 150.rnBelli colors and contrasto.rnLo buy back and definitely recommend it to anyone |
 | sent on December 03, 2016 Pros: quality, versatility, speed autofocus, stabilizer Cons: dangerously fragile Opinion: I took this lens for a while ', and I use it often on 1dx. The 15mm focal length is great. a very versatile lens and bright. Here we speak of a super wide-angle (15mm), with all the strengths and weaknesses. The lens hood can not be otherwise, or enters the frame. But the cap is well done and engages well. rnnei against I put "dangerously fragile" .rnPiù 'or less fell to the ground from a height of about 50cm, and even though in a good and padded bag (in fact, the thud was deaf, so as not putting me in alarm) l 'aim has been broken into two parts. rnNonostante this, the reattachment with a few rounds of tape and I finish the job (not working in manual focus) rnsmontato by an expert, we found that the two sides lens hold together only by four small screws, which in turn are screwed on four really osceni.rntutti supports 4 and the supports of the screws have broken the net andit was not possible to paste them or replace them. rnabbiamo removed the pieces that wandered in and joined the lens with a good tape .. works fine except the manual focus. RNE 'a shame that one lens so good from all points of view have this' heel Achille.rnI Canon L series are much, much more' robust, and as the Tamron stands almost on one thousand euro, this weakness is just annoying. |
 | sent on November 27, 2016 Pros: construction quality, appears now massive, slow retractable safety position ... Stabilization, sharpness, resistance to flare. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I took this view, after a long and careful study between her and the 14-24 NK, I must say that having tried the 14-24, I'm really pleased with the choice because it surpasses the great, it has an amazing rendition, stabilizer very well thought and running, fast auto focus ... rnUsato in low light situations or 0 (milky way) and was released a picture beyond my expectations, perhaps the only flaw are the filters, very expensive plate SW 150, but incredibly useful. rnInsomma a lens to take your eyes closed! |
 | sent on November 21, 2016 Pros: Stabilization, clarity, strength, seems to have also waterproof, excellent performance of live backlit flare. Cons: Conspicuous by flare band with light sideways, hood insufficient. Opinion: I replaced a Nikon 14-24 2.8 went to the cemetery after years of hard work and accumulated barrel. Impressive yield, is a 16mm and 15mm not actually, but they are all sharp and useful 16mm field, no regret for the Nikkor fact, here's a fabulous stabilizer. I use it mostly for architecture and interior, a marvel. I will keep the narrow, single lens between third Nikkor Pro I own but I do indeed feel ashamed! |
 | sent on October 31, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, Little distortion, excellent colors, phenomenal Stabilization, Comodo range of focal Cons: Weight and size; only plate filters (expensive) Opinion: I own this lens for about a year now and I'm very satisfied, crystal clear and very convenient as a range of focal lengths. He did not leak heavy losses in terms of overall performance at the extremes of the zoom range. The weight and the 'certain bulk are there, but are nevertheless well balanced with an FX body and is not much of a problem even use it for many hours. Stabilization phenomenal, especially in video. It is the only small flaw in plate filters (for those who use them) that are a little uncomfortable and very expensive, but worth it ... |
 | sent on October 13, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, and distortion aberrations almost absent, focal length Cons: But something is missing ... I do not know what .. And obviously expensive plate filters Opinion: The goal is in my possession for about a month and tried to stubborn properly ... Actually the yield did not surprise me that much more but only because I had already read and seen photographs made by other users, and then I knew what was waiting for me ... That is a lens from the fantastic clarity, able to reproduce the colors in an optimal manner and with a value for money really good price (the nikon 14-24 much more cost). The expectations have been met. no defects have not noticed remarkable (if I will edit this review) and I find it very convenient being able to move to a position that allows you to work at the top for both landscapes and also for the street. The weight does not think it's a problem for those who buy a view like that, a 2.8 weighs and then those who approach these lenses knows what they are getting ... I have not found "nice" the zoom movement ... Not there was a great feeling by turning from one focal and when I focus always prefer to rely on manual movement ofthe ring but perhaps it is just my determination that when shooting with wide-angle always prefer to do everything in mf ... The stabilization may be used when doing street but honestly it is not the reason why I chose this goal. Ability to shoot even at f 2.8 and thus not only for landscape use, for the stars, and the lack of aberrations cromentiche showy and rainbow made me prefer this lens to Tokina also competitive price compared to Nikon makes it very interesting. .. the purchase of this lens (I love it) but I have not (yet) led to sell 14 tammy 2.8 and / or 1.8 nikon 28 g and I think eventually I'll keep them ... I suggest buying if looking for a quality wide angle it is worth it |
 | sent on October 03, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, robustness, excellent color, absence of aberrations, stabilizer, distorsione.- Cons: Weight.- Opinion: L 'I bought used a few days ago, the impression is very good. Very easy to handle, stabilization super, almost no flare, making fast and accurate fire, f / 4 onwards made super well in the corners, the VC allows freehand night shots even with half of a second time. Delighted purchase, recommend to tutti.-rn |
| sent on August 27, 2016 Pros: A speed AF scary, 15mm f 2.8 to 30 !! stratospheric stabilizer tried to snap 1/6 freehand Cons: if I have to find one ... sforzandomi..il front cap. Opinion: solid, strong, razor sharp lens, f fast and precise, distortion legerissime to almost perfect edges for architecture to 15mm, for night surpasses the legendary Samyang 14mm. on nikon d750 is truly ultra versatile. Heavy and stable freehand allows you to shoot with very low time thanks to a very effective stabilizer in final: size matters and how! |
 | sent on August 18, 2016 Pros: Construction, solidity, AF, f.2.8 FIXED, stabilization, ten-year guarantee (!), Retail and light output. Cons: At the moment, however, zero zero street waiting for field testing in the second half. Opinion: FIRST IMPRESSIONS - Received today, purchased by RCE PHOTO with invaluable service and excellent resale values; at first glance, it seems a great accomplishment Tamron.rn I repeat: the universal builders of lenses are making strides into viable and innovative products, at affordable prices for their quality, the Major ... sleep and Campania on the bodies more or less up to date. rnTornando the beast, the short test it on the field but we are currently strasoddisfatto. Note dutiful: for weak wrist and fighettini, unwise because it looks like a washing machine and see him arrive before and after the camera body. For me, a must. rnrnSECONDE IMPRESSIONS to 03/10/2016: already wide open, clear and etched. well-rendered colors, suitable AF to the mass of slow but precise, not too suitable for action shots. Great and soo recommended ... |
| sent on July 30, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, fast AF, construction and sturdiness of the materials used. Cons: If the weight seems excessive, then try (if you find them!) Other optics f / 2.8 weighing less !! Opinion: I was unsure whether to take my first Tamron, but reading here and there, I changed my mind at least on this model. A tank of solidity and costtuzione, but to have a 15-30 f / 2.8 so it could not be less. AF good in low light conditions (I Live Music) and I do not regret the Nikon 14-24 is a great lens. The weight is in conformity to the size and opening, it could do no better ... for now. Excellent quality / price ratio considering that on that range of focal f / 2.8 there are a few models and well above 1000 €. |
| sent on June 24, 2016 Pros: Quality materials, the lens, the images, tones, colors, contrasts, shades .... I would say very good, we add six 10years OF GARANZIA..penso to be the top, I talk because I also had the nikon 14-24 (another excellent goal) and tokina 16-28 (goal from Best image quality I would say. Cons: with a view to this valuable cons leave the time they find, size, weight, and inability to protect the beautiful slow ... but just use it with some forethought and .... Opinion: How tokina, Nikon, Tamron also has a considerable weight, really excellent quality and very commendable warranty although in my opinion too exaggerated. I did 7 years of which the first three Kasco a total coverage in omaggio.rnGrande lens for great satisfaction, I would not say that to be a hard time to any of the three mentioned above, I emphasize instead that everyone has an angle different albeit slightly but that make a difference ..... then it depends what one seeks, obvious that if you want the brand of forocamera ... the other lets you .... but honestly with a little savings you have a great prodotto.rnIo the advice more than ever, I think 15-30 an ideal fit .... |
 | sent on May 28, 2016 Pros: flare resistance, clarity, stabilizer, af speed, star aperture Cons: weight, no screw filters (more than anything else the cost) Opinion: I sold the Samyang 14mm canon and 24/105 to take this great lens that is giving me a billion soddisfazioni.rnlente razor sharp, af fast, stabilization which is always useful especially for streetrndirei inventions that only flaw is precisely the "Get Noticed "for size and weight, but everything else is truly remarkable. large lens. Additional fees purchase! rnrnnb for the cap: in fact this is just mounted for interference, and I find it 100 times better than that of the Samyang that he should engage the petals but actually I dropped a billion times. I find the "smart" solution |
 | sent on May 07, 2016 Pros: I find everything perfect in this lens by the focal length at the opening of sharpness to the very poor flare Cons: frankly I still have not found it for me Opinion: Spectacular goal, took ten days ago and immediately put to the test with a full view of the mountains of clouds, it seems that you are wearing; I often read that the weight and 'a problem ... personally accustomed to d800 with a Sigma 150-500 or a nikon 28-70 I find all this enormous weight ... and you' massive, but as often happens and 'index good lens ... rnrnho also wanted to test him with a backlight (frontal sun, totally closing the diaphragm) a very small minimum flare that not even boredom or otherwise you cerotta away in post.rnrnecco is perhaps the story of the filters. .. but once bought those slab think it solves the problem! rnrne to finish 10 year warranty Italy are optimal! rn |
 | sent on February 25, 2016 Pros: Best Tamron lens ever (at least so far) Cons: For me against any but those who know before purchase Opinion: A masterpiece! Improving albeit with 1mm less on the wide-angle side of the legendary Nikkor 14-24 was not easy, and Tamron Company's success, and moreover adding us stabilizer. What do you want? Ok the baby is bulky and heavy, is less beautiful than the Nikkor 14-24 and less noble material, but still well made and sturdy ... Defects that can not mount the filters and the cap is like that of the 14-24? Then do not buy for yourselves! |
 | sent on February 08, 2016 Pros: Clarity, toughness, good zoom range, good color rendering Cons: heavy, big, good resistance to flare but not outstanding, cap so-so, no screw-on filters. Opinion: Start by saying straight away that I mounted on my Nikon d750 and first contact I felt it was really a bell'obiettivo, good construction and plastic materials used, then the weight feels well enough and that means that there is much substance in . In fact that's it, the image quality of this objective is amazing: sharpness, color, focal length (with which you can also do a little street), fast, pleasing bokeh autofocus (mostly 30mm), very little vignetting even sharp enough in the corners and edges. The resistance to flare is good but not exceptional in that it happened to me to find it in some pictures with the sunlight coming from the side (more precisely from my right to 15mm), but I must also say that it was a very discreet flare and easy to remove in post production, in short, nothing irreconcilable. For the rest I can say that stabilization is more comfortable with focal lengths ranging from 24mmto 30mm. It is not a purely objective "by street" but it may very well remain attached to the body for a day (especially when traveling), since you can not very well take the 80% of photos, certainly is not a pure all-rounder, but still managed to meet my needs. Can not mount screw filters, but could never do it because he has a large, round front lens protruding enough from the lens. Finally the cap: they could do very well as a block in the Samyang 14mm, so instead you may easily lose it when mounted. Ultimately I can only straconsigliare this objective that according to many equals the performance of the infamous Nikon 14-24 at a clearly lower price. I have tried the Nikon 14-24mm one time for an hour and of course I would not compare the two goals, I can only say that this is really an excellent Tamron wide zoom at a very affordable price than the competition. |
 | sent on February 08, 2016 Pros: Sharpness scary, super colors, absence of aberrations, stabilization, resistance to manual flare, 5 year warranty. Cons: Flashy, big. Opinion: It 'a fantastic lens, the sharpness is really incredible. Observing the display images on 6d, at maximum magnification, you do not have the feeling to have them enlarged, so much sharper. Optically I not know what to get him defects. Some time ago I watched admired the pictures taken with the Nikkor 14-24, the reference lens in that segment (so far ...). Well, it seems that this Tamron will be taking his place, in many respects is definitely on another level. The much-maligned cap, does not seem bad, rather it is a simple and functional way, to plug. With Canon, especially if there is a deep hood, it is a precision job they snap. The inability to mount a human price filters, for now I do not care. Certainly does not go unnoticed, in front of the bulb and the diameter are noted. |
| sent on December 24, 2015 Pros: brightness resolution fantastic colors fast autofocus ... Cons: x normal weight but is a lens of these coratterisriche, no filters, but you can always fix it, the cap laugh interlocking could be done differently Opinion: I have this lens for a few weeks I was amazed of the photos that makes the use with nikon d800 goes far right does not have the more detached from my nikon, high resolution, great tamron ............ ..credo that will give a hard time to others like the well known brands, just over a thousand Euros have a large lens |
 | sent on October 12, 2015 Pros: Build quality, sharpness, hike, opening, stabilization, autofocus great. Cons: Zoom ring a little hard (but the best hope is that with the use), there would be the weight in against but I do not feel like saying they could do better, surely something would be lost; the cap lens cap could have a catch, but it only stuck on the petal integrated. Opinion: Excellent lens. Newly purchased but immediately gave me a good feeling. Fast autofocus and excellent VR. Flare handled very well and I did not notice vignetting d750 also in 15mm F2.8. Beautiful bokeh considering the type of lens. Useful 30mm. Quality in everything except for the cover cap that fits on the petal lens protection without a catch, the fear is that with the use can take a bit of "play" and lose. The ultimate Nikon today ... |
 | sent on October 01, 2015 Pros: Stabilization and fast precise autofocus, micro-contrast, construction and weather sealing. 5-year warranty, in the first two you replace it with a new one. Cons: Do not install the filters screw Opinion: A must-have for nikon d750, mates a fairy tale. I bought so in advance of going on a trip and I used both for the landscape and for the street. It 'a fantastic lens, from every point of view. And 'light, it stabilized (I who have the little hand trembling can also take 1/10 of a second). The autofocus is very fast and accurate, he never missed a shot (surely the problem is less of an angle). It 's very clear from center to edges and shoot backlit is not a problem since very favorably flare. For many weight is a problem, instead I find it best to hold d750 and this compared to 35 sigma art. I find the combination more balanced. |
 | sent on October 01, 2015 Pros: Color rendering, low distortion, almost no flare, stabilization Cons: Perhaps the weight, but for a lens of this kind is normal, inability to mount the filters Opinion: I own this lens for less than a month, but we have already taken over a thousand photographs. I do not want to be repetitive, so aspects already mentioned in other reviews I have nothing to add: I have found the same qualities. However, one thing that left me pleasantly surprised is the color rendering: bright colors, live, that sometimes you avoid even the intervention of postproduction. Some new, however, is: the weight is considerable and hand feels. The "small" is larger than the brother of focal increased, that 24 to 70 who did so much to talk well in the past and that is part of my kit. However, on a FF as my Nikon D610, all is well balanced and, therefore, at the end you get used. The inability to mount filters is a problem known to all ultrawide, then we fly over. Last observation to do is the near absence of flare. I say "almost" because it can happen to find it, the Maledpound flare: that happened to me in some shots against the sun more or less at noon, but it is nonetheless treated to a very marginal phenomenon that did not compromise the picture. rnrnChe say? I am very happy the shopping done and, if you like ultrawide band objectives, this objective can not miss in your kit |
 | sent on September 25, 2015 Pros: Build quality, image quality, blur, AF Cons: Perhaps the footprint is the weight but for the lens type is however accettabilr Opinion: I purchased a few months ago this goal. At first I had to learn to understand the use and to have to deal with the distortions of these focal. RNLA quality and notidezza I was immediately impressed and I think for the views you can hardly find anything better. RNLA color depth and the yield of the same nature appears immediately without recourse to the PP. I believe that today we place it high on the list of this range focali.rnLo stabilizer is phenomenal !! |
 | sent on September 20, 2015 Pros: Crisp, Stabilization perfect, bright, fast AF, sturdy and well built Cons: Weight Opinion: I got it after assessing the Tokina 16-28.rnDevo also say that they are very satisfied with the choice, because the Tamron has all the features I was looking for: precise and fast AF, stabilization and highly effective brightness for night or in dark environments .rnFinalmente a lens which is difficult to do I'll know meno.rnConsigliatissima |
 | sent on June 22, 2015 Pros: Nitidezza- Excursion focale- No flare-Stabilization-Distortion. Cons: Weight Opinion: Optical high-quality, sharp wide open, improves the corners already f4. The VC works well allowing night shots without a tripod with the times even half a second. Accurate AF. Very well controlled flare and distortion even at 15mm. It's not a featherweight, but even so, not because it is cumbersome, the size, are relatively compatte.rnPer what little I used, a pleasant surprise. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
