JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Loss of sharpness at the edges, at least my specimen.
Opinion:All in all a good zoom even if with the focal one is better, like the "white" Canon L series that has a much higher sharpness. Like all Sony very expensive and frankly I can understand an f 2.8 but not an f 4. Now I don't have it anymore, I hope Sony will produce a more performing one because it is a focal length that a landscaper cannot do without.
Opinion:I used it on the A7R3 and was disappointed overall. The AF is undoubtedly excellent, one of the best ever tried and the construction is of a very good standard. However, mechanical qualities are being put into the background by optical gaps. The sharpness on the 42mp sensors is definitely insufficient at TA and only improves by closing by a stop or 2. There are also important chromatic abberrations even in light situations that are not so critical. The cost is important and genuinely inadequate for optical performance. I was much more counting than the 70-200 F4 L IS USM of the canon used with adapter. Finally, I would say that I resold the optics after just over a month, the only time it happened to me.
Opinion:If you don't need it at all costs (literally) the 2.8, this Sony f/4 offers an excellent alternative to half the price of the "brother". The lens is engraved, the AF very fast, the weight limited. With its stabilization I can use it freehand even with relatively long times even I, despite not having a particularly firm hand.
Pros:Excellent construction biancone-churns out sharp images-well defined colors-Tropicallzzato-F4 constant-excellent AF-no flare and aberrations.
Cons:Weight.
Opinion:I bought it these days and use it on the Sony Alpha 7RIII binomial very successful, the balance is more than valid, the footprint a little less being a mirrorless but all in all compelling. The images are beautiful, the colors vivid and well defined, the focus accurate and fast. The fixing bracket to the practical stand and allows various positions. The stabilization is really fabulous, with slow times you do not notice blurred or wavy. The AF fast, precise and silent. Optics that I highly recommend.
Pros:Really a sharp target, aberrations and flare almost null, good construction
Cons:New price a bit high
Opinion:This lens I use is mainly on a Sony Alpha 6000, and I have to say I'm extremely satisfied, the quality of the colors and the sharpness is really great, and in my opinion, its best af 5 then where the picture becomes really sharp. Aberrations and flare almost null if they do not even exist in difficult light conditions. I use it a lot on an aps-c and I'm very happy, but on the full frame from the best of it. The construction seems delicate, but used in various travels in conditions not exactly comfortable or easy to turn out to be quite durable. The new price is a bit expensive in my opinion and is a bit heavy but the purchase is worth it according to me. which I highly recommend-