JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Very light, compact, crisp, excellent coupled with A7R2
Cons:Non-stabilised
Opinion:In my opinion is not worth the price list, despite being a lens of Zeiss for what is in constructive terms I would see in Sales no more than 400 euros, personally bought new online to 450, but I would never take it to 700 compact and light , two notable merits combined with the great ability to capture colors and details.. I am not a great expert and I do not allow myself to write terms and words but... From the Amateur Council!
Pros:Size, weight, sharpness, contrast. T * Lens Treatment
Cons:Manual focus can be improved. Price, but who buys a Ferrari knows that it will not pay little!
Opinion:Lens for me outstanding for the features listed among the advantages. The price is high, but those who prefer the Ciofagon or the Buoiotar can safely do without buying a mirrorless Full Frame. With this lens I rediscovered the pleasure of zooming by moving back and forth walking, imagining to have an old rangefinder machine, small, precise, fast in the shot. So lens for the amateur of photography, and perhaps for nostalgic!
Opinion:Let's start by saying that the Zeiss 35 f2.8 is chosen for its small size without worrying too much about the price. For lightness, compactness and quality becomes the irreplaceable companion of any Sony mirrorless camera (at least it is for me on my A9). The best thing about this lens is the sharpness that, combined with high contrast and very vivid colors, gives extremely bright and three-dimensional images even when the light is not optimal. The anti-reflective treatment is good, the vignetting ad f2.8 is present but ascending gradually to f8 disappears altogether. Obviously it is easily eliminable in post production. The chromatic aberrations are controlled in an excellent way and the barrel distortion is on minimum values and, looking for it, it can be found just a little on the corners. The Sony Zeiss 35mm f2.8 is undoubtedly a lens with excellent optical performance. The only negative note... needless to deny.. is the high price!
Opinion:This will be an honest review. Driven by the superb reviews I bought this lens and... it didn't go. We start from the fact that the price is absurd and unjustified. At the same digit (new second-used used) you buy a sigma art 35mm. But let's go by degrees. Anyone who thinks of buying a lens like this has a mind to flank it to a Sony A7 and turn it as if it had a compact. The problem is, you don't have a compact. Would you turn with a A7R2 in the jacket pocket? Frankly I find some nice reviews, you're talking about a couple worth over €2000 to the new minimum, and people talk about it as if they had a sandwich in their pockets to eat. Needless to mention the image quality, from a 35mm f/2.8 you can't have poor image quality, it's unthinkable. But you in a perspective to kill (because if you keep it in the pocket of the jacket this you do), look at the sharpness? It seems that this lens was born to take in hyperfocal forgetting of any bokeh effect. Another big flaw is the ride-by-wire, which absolutely does not return a pleasant feeling, the ring slides as if it were oiled, probably due to the still immature design of the electronic focus system. So for me, it's a completely flunky, fancy-eye lens. For those who really need an absolute image quality in the size of a compact would do well to orient on a much more comfortable and sensible RX1, which with also a splendid optical F2 certainly allows better results. If you have a professional car instead, and you are not sick that you turn with thousands of euros in the pocket of the jacket (in this case this is the optics for you), orient yourself on other.
Pros:Nite, compact and light, zeiss colors and contrast
Cons:backlight
Opinion:Stunning travel targets along with a sony A7 form a fearless couple for lightness and professional images. Lightweight and compact when you do not use it you can simply take it in your pocket without any problems. Backlit does not make me crazy, sometimes it tends to become a kind of light fog that I can not manage too well in post-production (but it's a matter of taste). Sharpness is simply absurd for a lens of this dimension. If you are looking for it, it is reasonably priced. I would recycle it 100 more times.
Pros:Typical Zeiss colors, compactness and lightness with included hood, sharpness, silent AF
Cons:Price for a 35 2.8
Opinion:Objective that perfectly embodies the mirrorless philosophy as extremely compact, light (slightly more than a hectogram) and of great quality.rnThanks to its included lens hood size lends itself well to reportage and street. rnsoffre a little the backlight.rnPrice for a 35 2.8 exaggerated, not in line with the other builders.rnComunque straconsiglio!
Pros:Sharpness, color and imaging performance typical Zeiss, relatively low cost
Cons:Lack of reading focal distance
Opinion:Not much I use this lens but now is going steady with my Sony A7. I can put them in the pocket of his sweatshirt and go wide so equipped camera without difficulty and dimensions. The yield is good, comparable to the optical Leica where I come from. Even at full aperture the photo quality is good and you can get an effect of focus behind on the first floor. My experience, not by professional photographer, I do remember, however, the results of photos taken with the Rollej, very sharp and contrasted.
Opinion:Great lens, well corrected, with 3d effect from 2.8 to f5.6 nice bokeh despite not having great apertura.Poteva be f2, but I imagine it was intended to contain the size of 2.8 to lug around a combination to7 / 35mm that can satisfy an output generic in 90per100 situations in a package almost tascabile.Quando bought the sony to7 I was undecided between this and zoom 35 24/70 but for the size of the package I preferred the portability and definitely higher quality 35mm
Pros:sharpness in TA, resistance backlight (contrast, flare), distortion, size, lens hood, weight, silent af
Cons:for now, no.
Opinion:I mount it on a7s and after reading many reviews, I decided not to trust the reviews. A TA is sharp from edge to edge (while networking turn of the samples which, in my opinion, are defective models). RNLA made in the backlight is spectacular, does not lose contrast and flare is practically zero. Contrast and colors zeiss.rnPer me is a great lens at a good price. The fact that 2.8 is not a problem for me, and for those who wanted the 1.4 is coming out that will have a completely different size, weight and cost. The autofocus is silent. The lens hood is invisible and does his job.
Opinion:The use of Sony A7. Coming from Leica M9 and Leica lenses use the latter as a yardstick. This is definitely a lens 35 Sony discreet, razor sharp and with excellent optical correction of the distortion. Very high contrast, perhaps too much, but with a pleasing bokeh anyway. For the rest instead is little more than enough. If we consider that only f2, 8 (a project then definitely not extreme) has a vignettattura excessive as well as sizes. Probably the Sony is having some trouble getting the NEX attack and draw the short and the coverage FF. To confirm this is the 35 f2, 8 is 28-70 zoom lens actually have the rear far from the sensor. In particular, the zoom, an optical seems to "reflex" with built-in adapter ring. Returning to the 35 f2, 8 would conclude by saying that undoubtedly can produce excellent results, it seems well built and feels solid. Scepticism is only in relation to the opening price and only f2, 8. rnp.s. I would add that the lens hood is acelutamente unwatchable.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
