JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:The Lord of Light: Sharp, luminous, three-dimensionality and very soft bokeh.
Cons:It is Not the weight of the problem, but the aberrations (chromatic and not) is the true defect of the Distagon
Opinion:I owned it for almost a year, and I have to be honest, it was my favorite lens after the 24-70GM. Exceptional Construction of metal, with the aperture ring that I like a lot, especially in video. On the construction of the lens, while not finding the gasket on the mount of the bayonet, defends well against the weather and dust, and surprise (not to do ABSOLUTELY!) with the sea water, but there is the sea to make us two bathrooms with my a7RII and the lens Zeiss. However it holds very well on tropicalization. Performance is great, in line with Sony lenses, Af performing (perfect for video and photos), excellent sharpness, but at f1.4 is very soft (almost ideal for half-bust portraits or close ups), the detail, from f2.8 onwards is outstanding, up to F11. Unfortunately the flaws are visible at sight, not so much distortion, but the vignetting is present in an almost intrusive (from F 2.8 improves) Chromatic aberration, is the true weak link of the Zeiss, to correct the disturbance also serves the help of programs Post Production (NB: Activating the objective compensation, the defect is less, but there) also the flare are visible, pleasing the star effect that produces at closed diaphragms. But the bokeh and the three-dimensionality, do an outstanding job. The bokeh is very soft, perfect for creating artistic closeups, and the micro contrast is typical of the Zeiss lenses... Conclusion? For video and photos this lens is perfect. It costs a bit, but you do great things...
Pros:Optics exceptional comparable to the Leica Summilux Fle, boken delicious, great 3D effect.
Cons:A boulder, big and heavy defeats most of the utility of mirrorless.
Opinion:I took this long-awaited lens in place of Summilux FLE use on A7r. I'm not absolutely regret the Leica lens as image quality, but the size is really important. This coupled with A7r weighs only 500 grams less than the Nikon D750 with Sigma 50mm Art. Auto focus in line with the other optics.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
