JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness and image quality at the top of the category, low distortion to all focal points, contrast and colors, construction and resistance, excellent response of the dials, flare resistance, versatility
Cons:weight, price but you know the quality it costs
Opinion:objective with an indisputable image quality that is ideal for interiors, streetphoto, even night views until the release of the canon series 3 was the top on the market source analysis: DxoMark and Dpreview, today if they play it at even arms) surely another world for those like me came from the canon 16-35 f4 (excellent lens but lower especially in the distortion that is too pronounced on the canon) the classic focal distance 16-35 allows a good flexibility of use. Opening 2.8 on a lens like this can be useless for the most. but with this lens you can safely do streetphoto and wanting to go further in the even astro and some portrait (at 35mm clearly) the limits are the weight definitely important and the price but on the other hand this lens is worth what it costs and and in line with rivals Canon Nikon alternatives for those who want to experiment and and very good in composition composition I suggest to consider the 12-24 Sony that compared to the competitors in the same focal costs about the meta competition. for us look for lightness can consider the Tamron 17-28 that costs less but and much more sacrificed in the focal range, in my opinion too much in both sides, and qualitatively does not exalt me, rather flat photos less rich in detail and contrast... on the other hand it costs hundreds of euros less...
Opinion:And built impeccably with excellent materials. Fantastic sharpness at 2.8 with a blurry creamy, but the best from when you close with 11 to 22. It does not suffer from flare ne from sunlight that artificial. I would have preferred a focal start to 14 with a greater field width because at 16 in some contexts it is long.
Pros:Light, small, excellent build quality, good image quality.
Cons:The resolve, especially at the extremes, at full aperture and in particular at 35, is not the best.
Opinion:Beautiful lens, comfortable, light, practical and well built. Little bigger than a similar zoom but F4. The quality of image is high, but unfortunately nothing to do with fixed the caliber of Art, despite what is alleged by advertising. But on the other hand, the 42MP sensor does not forgive any smearing. I doubt that there is better on the market at certain focal lengths and openings, in fact of zoom.
Pros:Construction, image quality throughout the frame, focus and handling FANTASTIC... Perfect lens and with a stunning boker thanks to its 11 slats and incredible quality thanks to the optical structure made from aspheric lenses, and it is above all 2 lenses XA
Cons:None other than the price, but of course the quality G MASTER you pay, although not far from competitors Canon and Nikon
Opinion:WONDERFUL GOAL, I RECOMMEND IT TO EVERYONE... DON'T LISTEN TO US WHO HAVE IT, TRY IT TO BELIEVE... it's been a long time since I wanted an optics like this and thanks to Sony it came. I own an A7III and it's gorgeous, I dare not imagine on an A7RIII. I think we have arrived at a new standard of quality and Sony, as in all its departments and areas where it competes, Sony stands out and offers an extra edge, just think about the mirrorless system
Pros:Sharpness, construction, fast focus, chromatic rendering, bokeh
Cons:Price, footprint
Opinion:I had the Sony / Zeiss 16/35 f4, and for me it was a blade, I took this to have the 2.8 aperture ... bhè are 3 blades! Crazy, very sharp lens, fluid rings, great chromatic rendering, amazing detail, a nice bokeh to be a granddaughter ... so say a sign zoom.rnAbblined to the A7RII is a joke ... the only flaw is the price!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
