JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Lightness, the possibility of using all the "vintage" goals, good sensor, wide dynamic range
Cons:the black paint of the car goes away easily, battery life
Opinion:rnHo bought this car and I'm chuffed, use this body with my camera Canon FD kit that with the advent of digital technology and the Canon decision not to use the mythical objectives canon fd, I had put everything in cascione and continued to photograph with a Panasonic Bridge, but now that I bought the sony A7r mounted on the canon FD lenses is a pure fun. The machine is used in manual or aperture priority and will not be mistaken clicks. Except for the focus, of course, it remains manual and a short-sighted like me sometimes a cane shot him ;-))
Opinion:Sony was the first to have produced a usable sensor in digital history with the 0.3 megapixel Sony Mavica, (other times) produces sensors of almost any Nikon, the quality with these premises there is all. And 'a light machine, but at the same time has a good feeling of strength I use with so-called objectives "vintage" rnche unfortunately with my Nikon D750 I could not use properly for different focal draft. An excellent "Beast." Ps: ISO range of 50 to 25600
Cons:Number and dedicated objectives cost, battery life, delicacy, high ISO, noise ergonomics.
Opinion:This car really offers an amazing resolution that is especially noticeable in enlargements of the PC or prints 50x70 up. In your hand feels like a toy even though it is a concentrate of high technology, personally I prefer a body that is heard in hand robust and stable, I found the touch, also a little delicate and you have to be careful not to slam anywhere because black coating is away at once and you see the silver metal that lies beneath. The viewfinder is really a phenomenal thing, comfortable and bright, also owns the peaking focus allowing Perfect focus even if it is not always 100% accurate especially of large apertures. The image quality is generally good although the noise is already known by ISO 2000; even videos (avchd with H.264) encoding are really good. Unfortunately I was pushed to change this body because of the optics because there are so very few dedicated than other brands and also being very expensive (I find unacceptable spAKING 2300 Euros for a 24-70) that in the end, despite being zeiss, solve the vast number of MPs less than other nikon or canon that cost half or even less if you buy used. The really poor battery life, 300 shots to the limit and even videos just over half an hour continuously. Convenient (and also perhaps mild) the orientation features. I find it almost unnecessary to buy this machine in order to have a light body if you are interested in shooting with af dedicated objectives in their weight as those for SLR apart from 3 or 4 pieces if using vintage lenses instead makes sense because between the body and two goals, maybe 28 and 35 mm, do not even get to 1kg and footprint is minimal.
Cons:autofocus system is evolved as the high-end SLR
Opinion:After a year of use, I am fully satisfied: the choice I would do (I divested SLR 6d and 5d2 and its kit canon). RNLA use (along the a7) with objectives and leica r mm, tse canon, sony 55 fe zeiss and more. Fully satisfy me, and above all it is a pleasure to go out with 35 and 75 Summilux with a single shoulder strap type Blackrapid, without the weight of two cameras and without sacrificing anything in terms of quality (indeed) .rnScattare over 100mm becomes challenging if you want use the magnification for focusing freehand and with moving subjects is preferable a serious SLR with a lens with autofocus performance: however, on my way to photograph, that's fine too.
Pros:Size, quality, stratospheric sensor dynamic range to scream, noise content (but not exciting).
Cons:AF limit of sufficiency, poor equipment (user manual, lack of external charger), battery life poor
Opinion:I went back to the mythical 36MP Sony sensor, having owned the D800E years ago and after selling the kit Fuji mirrorless. rnL'impressione is upsetting based on use with Zeiss 35mm f/2.8. I made comparisons with Canon lenses in my possession (currently use a 5DMK3) and 24-70 @ 35mm f/2.8 II it is losing out, this is to give an idea of ??the value of this oggetto.rnHo then performed a test with the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 lens with Metabones adapter III and the results speak for themselves: the same lens used on 5DMK3 does not give the same results. I believe that there is a wide-angle lens on the market just as spectacular, then on A7r really gives the best of sé.rnLa richness of detail and image in general is a pure enjoyment. I found out, and I provide this information for the benefit of the friends of Juza, the RAW processor I've always used (Capture One Pro 7), does not read RAW files at the same level as the SW supplied by Sony. This SW is a nail in terms of performance (even on the MacBook PRO performance chand usually use), but I think the end results will give ragione.rnE 'a surprise, but invite you to do the tests. ACR in my opinion is still low focal peggiore.rnA I have not encountered problems due to vibration down meccanica.rnLa battery life make it obligatory to have (at least) a spare.rnrn
Pros:Dimensions, construction, sensor, color user interface.
Cons:Battery life, auto focus (?).
Opinion:Amazing camera. The detail returned by the sensor is nothing less than impressive and I come from an already excellent Canon 5DII. I did not think possible to get a more detailed file and nice to work with Canon, but instead what it is. It is also very compact! It is neither larger nor heavier than a Nikon FM. Needless to say I was expecting for some time and did not disappoint aspettative.rnGli only drawbacks that I have found are a battery life much lower than expected and the noise of shooting ... and a dry mechanical "clack" that partially cancels you can take the advantage of passing inosservati.rnPurtroppo use only manual lenses so I do not pronounce on the focus speed.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
