JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Adjustable screen and touch. AF, transportability
Cons:Lack viewfinder, the autofocus sometimes canna but it's probably because the I have to know better
Opinion:Bought it used to be able to take it behind the bike. Good quality after some setting becomes discreetly intuitive, I feel darn the lack of the viewfinder unfortunately, in case I predero the older sister namely the 6000. or the 6300. For the rest nothing to be objected to the reassurance Absolutumantente again clearly used machine to always have with him with quality objectives we climb a step
Pros:compactness, unparalleled value, fast AF, high quality shots, touch
Cons:Lack of viewfinder (subjective, at the beginning I thought for myself was relative, I actually had to fall back on the body with viewfinder also for this), display in open daylight almost unusable, a little ' too small for those who have big hands
Opinion:I bought the car last November, I found an opportunity at the Black Friday from Mediaworld to €399 (price at which the car fell only today, after almost a year). What to say, it was love at first sight, I bring it everywhere thanks to its incredible compactness. I also use Canon lenses with Commlite adapter and I am fine, I bring home almost always great shots, post-products and not. Unfortunately at the beginning I thought the lack of the viewfinder was not a problem, but now, after a few months of use and after testing the display in daylight (unusable) I feel the need to have a camera body with a viewfinder that allows me to see "where I put my feet "even in super-illuminated conditions. The quality of the photos, with correct settings, is really high level (shooting in JPG + raw). Battery life pretty good. Recommended to start.
Pros:Compactness, great jpeg, fast, precise focus, teach and recline screen, cost.
Cons:Complex menu, iso 2000 maximum limit with pp, battery life.
Opinion:I bought this car just recently, I used it with just over 2,000 shots so it's new. As soon as I started to shoot I was really stunned by the very sharp and precise focus, I come from a 550d canon that is really slow without counting it has only 9 focus points instead the sony a5100 has it 179, I said it all . The file quality is definitely a great dynamic range, the iso is the maximum limit and 2000-2500 with a good pp. I got this machine because I wanted something xke pocket whenever I came out I could not bring the reflex, it's too cumbersome, this one is very small, but it's worth more than a 350-lane reflex lens with a 16-50mm lens stacked inside buy different apps like timelapse, etc. I really do not know what's better at this price with these features.
Cons:Optical Parks, but it's a Sony limit and not the machine. In very bright days the LCD monitor is sometimes difficult to read
Opinion:Hi, it was my first true camera after years with compact, and I must say that he has given me great satisfaction. Its portability is as good as that of a compact. The files are very workable in post production and I recommend to anyone who is approaching the world of photography considering the expense / yield ratio. Great AF and great performance. I strongly recommend for those who like me mainly do landscape and long hiking.
Opinion:Simple to use and extraordinary versatile in relation to the potentiality. It is not too intuitive at the menu level. The difference between 6000 and above does not have the sledge for the flash and the viewfinder (sometimes missed), but it is the price To pay for its extreme compactness. Its durable battery life is far from reduced as it says around we speak about 450 shots. Fast and accurate autofocus. The only defect is ISO noise already greater than 800. of Made above 1000 is almost unusable even without being particularly fussy. Best to underdrive and recover in post (RAWs are very good) .nnnnunica sb the lack of an average light zoom lens at non-prohibitive prices, it is possible to get cheap vintage optics that can fit perfectly to the body machine size, but clearly Forget about the autofop, with all the pros and consor of the case. To facilitate the use of vintage optics, the peaking & wild focus functionve; awesome.
Pros:A camera in your pocket! RNE 'compact, lightweight and can you take of all, after reading the tutorial sony produces files ready for those who can post-produce, saturated colors, beautiful portraits and landscapes in incredible detail or another, some photos are baked at SLR Professional.
Cons:Button some more help to accelerate the selection of the parameters of the scene; good battery but if you play with the settings falls quickly.
Opinion:=========================> Update 07/01/2016 ================= ==> rnun good start in photography, good quality in most occasions but in situations of changes in temperature and pressure has annoying malfunzionamenti.rnAgli beginning easy to handle and intuitive (almost like a compact camera) but it eventually proved impractical , extensive use of menus and submenus for minor adjustments; too many sacrifices than an SLR, too few optical native! rnSostituita with REFLEX. <======================= RnPremetto that come from a compact camera, which means that I was used all'inquadra and snaps. Never used or ML.rnQuesta SLR camera, in the early days I was left with a bitter taste, I thought arrogantly that enough 2 pictures and I mastered the product and instead I found that the blur, blur and unwanted noise were behind the angle always in my PROVISIONSI, even when not required! rnPoi calmly, I read a bit 'of documentation Sony and ... show! rnrnSforna photo ready! rn- Landscapes (my specialty) with vivid bright colors, always in focus where appreciate the detail and depth, subjects disconnected, photos do not flatter. rn- Portraits (my pet peeve) are outstanding, I have yet to figure out some parameters but I baked the very nice pictures that will satisfy even the models more 'demanding (my girlfriend is quite picky and critical :-P) and without having to resort to Photoshop, soft skin, blurred background, eyes clearly focused and detailed as you like me.rn- Flowers in focus, bright, dettagliati.rn- animals, some difficulties to follow but that detail, the hair, the musetti sympathetic eyes ... there is no comparison with the 16-50 kit prima.rnrnCon I cut down all the limits that I had with my compattina.rnSono managed to get pictures of my cat where each hair has stood out, photos of flowers in focus with a decenyou blurred background and photos with various effects choppy water and a first controlled experiment of night wake limits .... All that I was close with the compact camera precedente.rnrnPer now the only limit are found pictures at night without tripod but here I think it's hard x anyone (also according to documents found online). However if you do not have a tripod and steady hands it is difficult to capture a photo clean and kelp, however the automatic in this machine produces excellent file ... and save the serata.rnCome physical limits of the machine I found the batteries if you play a bit 'is short ... I will have to provide for an extra battery. It would also be useful to have some extra button to customize and facilitate more frequenti.rnrnConsigliatissima x all kinds of users!
Pros:Excellent camera as an alternative to more famous REFLEX.
Cons:Unwieldy freehand with long focal lenses.
Opinion:Excellent small innovative camera with a wide range of functions that allows the creation of very detailed shots that do not regret the 'use of REFLEX. Lightweight and maneuverable for its firmness in 'continuous use when mounting the 16/50 included in the kit, it is a bit less, with targets at long focal definitely heavier and bulkier, the few that there are currently only tested briefly on the field .
Pros:Very compact size, light weight, adjustable screen, quality sensor, large feature equipment, fast AF, USB recharge, 6 FPS burst
Cons:Optical Park (native) still Limited
Opinion:The Sony A5100 combines advanced features and quality sensor (one of the best APS-C currently circulating) with an extremely compact and lightweight body. The ergonomics is clearly not that of a reflex, but for those who use it almost always on tripod is not a problem. The 180-degree swivel screen is a huge help in macro and landscape photography. You can extensively customize every aspect of the camera, including the functions of various buttons, a surprising completeness for a camera of this headband! Finally, you can recharge it directly via USB, without having an external charger. Together with the A6000, it is among the first Sony mirrorless to be equipped with AF phase detection, as fast as that of the reflex and able to keep the subject in focus during the burst from 6 FPS. The camera itself in my opinion has no major flaws, the main limit is in the optics: the choice of native optics is still decidedly inferior to Canon and Nikon, limiting the possibilities of use in some fields. However, Sony is rapidly expanding its offer, and in the meantime it is possible to use the optics of any brand through adaptors (but renounding to AF). The advice to those who do landscapes, macros and travel photos!