JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Great all-rounder with value for money, good overall sharpness, good build quality, good stabilization that works well with that of the A7 III, weight and reduced footprints considering the focal,
Cons:fluid, progressive brightness low
Opinion:To be a Superzoom the yield is very satisfying, even the weight and the footprints are satisfactory, excellent value perezzo, considering that he is an all-rounder. I use it on holiday and in family outings, mounted on the A7 III and works great, including autofocus even in low light conditions. The sharpness related to the type of optics is very good, it drops from 100mm but only at full opening, closing to f8 improves a little. Two defects that I found are the very hard to the movement and not very fluid, and the brightness, it is true that from the type of optics you can not expect great things however the scale of the diaphragms is a bit disappointing in the maximum opening at 30mm is already F4 40mm F4.5, 60mm F5, 70mm F5.6 and 100mm F6.3.
Cons:pretty dark but if it had been brighter it would have been non-transportable
Opinion:I've been thinking a lot about taking this compromised view because it's really extreme but I have to say that compared to the 28/300l Canon, which I've owned for years, it's definitely much better than white. Unfortunately the construction is much less professional than the canon but the back thanks. I must say that big problems does not have, at least after the software correction. A bit soft from 200 to 240 but nothing painful, better for example of the Canon 70/300 IS. Let's say I'm using it a lot on Sunday motorcycle rides and it's stunning me beyond all expectations
Pros:SuperZoom, little bulky, versatile, excellent yield up to 100mm already at TA
Cons:Yield that falls above 100mm, weight
Opinion:I bought this super zoom for the versatility of my unprogrammed outputs, I can do everything with this lens in these conditions. I think it is EXCELLENT at the level of sharpness up to almost 100mm at full aperture then Cala keeping still acceptable. I have paired some fixed not too expensive type the 85mm F 1.8 for portraits and short even the 50mm F 1.8 for the street. For the AF is quick until the light is enough, then when there is really dark it gets slower in focus. I consider myself satisfied with the purchase also because compared to the lens from kit 28-70 F4 This is another world (much better). Recommended.
Pros:Focal excursion, compact, good yield up to 100mm, price, size and weight
Cons:Yield drops much above the 100mm, the zoom in
Opinion:According to a well-known lens testing site and the best zoommone better than the Canon L 28-300. Definitely acceptable up to 100mm on almost the entire frame, it becomes more and more soft over the 100mm. I don't know if I would recommend the purchase, I took it to take it in my travels, and smaller than a 70/200 2.8 but autofocus and sharpness are on another galaxy. Small and compact
Pros:Focal distance, Stabilizer, relatively small dimensions, construction, color and contrast, sharpness with respect to lens type
Cons:24mm distortion corrected well in automatic. Luminosity (but they are all so)
Opinion:Yesterday I was in transit to Hong Kong. Coming a nice further discount for crew members, I let myself try and I took this zoom. Rn I'm generally not very supportive of these superzoom, but I think in a kit it can always be useful to have such a goal. Species considering the mirrorless, where by their nature, one has also chosen to be light. RnThe objective is obviously "dark" but for the rest it does its duty. It has a good stabilizer, the colors are great and the contrast. Sharpness is acceptable for a superzoom, and however, the contour of the lens corrects well distortions and aberrations. So acceptable.rnI recommend to add some fixed. Specifically an ultramangular (excellent 18mm Batis and 14mm Samyang for Sony AF) and a pair of lenses for portrait and street. We say that the 28 Sony f / 2 goes fine and costs the right, and I would consider the 55mm Sony Zeiss and an 85rn
Pros:Stabilizer excellent resolution at minimum focal distance of 240 great, the acceptable weight the only flaw is the handle of a7s.rn
Cons:For a whole make the sum of € 999.00 is well spesa.Purtroppo having with canon lenses of this focal lengths for me becomes a duplicate.
Opinion:The first impression you had too much of the difference in size for matching with the series a7.Generalmente with the right hand wield the camera and with the left I manage the goal, with this combination becomes difficult to argue with the right hand the A7S advisable Battery Grip (other added costs). and handle with your left hand the function of zoom.rnPurtroppo choices commerciality of Sony to market the objectives presented in September 2014 (over six months) to sob does not give me the opportunity to make a choice giusta.rn rn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
