JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Another boring and soulless lens of Sigma.... Sharp from edge to edge since f2.0, he doesn't give a damn about the backlight, well contrasted, beautiful colors, very well built, aperture ring, soft bokeh, has no tilt problems or various shifts, precise AF, decisive and rather fast .... A bore. Ah it's a bit heavy and has a bit of distortion, at least that.
Pros:- Diaphragm ring, - very pleasant overall rendering
Cons:- Engine not very quiet - fire ring little rubbed. - Magnetic cap but needed ?
Opinion:Used on SL2-s The lens is aesthetically pretty, without too much writing. The diaphragm ring with 1/3 stop clicks is pleasant to use. That of the fire I would prefer more friction, the function to have the linear focus (selection from the machine body) works. I am puzzled by the magnetic cap, his does it but I find it superfluous seen in the package there is the classic cap. The focal length is not the most common, but usable. The autofocus proved to be accurate both single and continuous. The engine is not very quiet, I have had more noisy, but you can hear it moving, especially continuously (the Leica has af contrast like the Panasonic). For today's videomakers who use AF, without an external microphone, it is a sound that the machine records. The yield I must say is pleasant, modern and very sharp, which pleases fans of angles and zoom on the screen, turning off the corrections, the vignetting is in the standard and there is the classic distortion of a vintage 50ino. I was pleasantly surprised by the blurred, progressive with a bit of spherical aberration to make everything softer, especially in the presence of critical situations such as urbanized areas and with few chromatic aberrations. I must say that among the autofocus lenses that I used in the focal range between 50 and 75mm, it is optically the one I preferred. It suffers from focus breathing like all photographic optics.
Pros:Fast and precise autofocus, top build quality, excellent flare resistance, razor sharp in center and edges, creamy blur and minimum focusing distance
Cons:Focal length, weight
Opinion:Before choosing I tried marginally the sony 85 1.8 and the samyang 75 1.8. They are excellent lenses, I would even say better the samy of the sony, but each had something that was not optimal, or the flare, or the sharpness at the edges or the construction. Sigma surpasses them in all these aspects. Then the minimum focusing distance allows you to make greater "close ups" than the others. Perhaps the focal length of 65 is a little peculiar, but in narrow environments it allows you to move away less and in any case, thanks to the minimum shorter focusing distance, allows you to get closer.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
