RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Sigma 180mm Macro f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Sigma 180mm Macro f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2017

Pros: Good Af, fast precise no calibration ... !!!! ??? and good as well with Nikon 1.4

Cons: weight! weight! weight! mmm ... then every time the stabilizer is turned on ...

Opinion: there is not 70 200 to hold ... kind of optical aberrations to look for with 200 300%, now used only for portraits, very blurry good engraving throughout the frame, great stabilizer but ... for me it would be pretty much perfect if it was not a whalebone nearly 2 kg !!! To say the old nikon 180 2.8 is not so evolved, it's not macro, it's not stabilized, weighs less than half ... 760 grams, though, here's my heretic part .... better or the like? 200 f 2 vr ??? for some could be a viable alternative (to the King 200 F2) cheap and even light ... gulp .. I said ... indeed .. I also wrote it !!!

avatarsupporter
sent on September 08, 2017

Pros: Perfection in fire, unparalleled sharpness

Cons: Weight, size, price

Opinion: To define with one word "FAVOLOSO". I came to mind to raise my mind by replacing the already good model 3,4 with this but I did not regret it. The old man went fine with the reflexes of the era like the D300 with regards to the MAFe AF, for the sharpness we are instead. I use it with its duplicate 1.4 Sigma even for avifauna when I can get close enough to the subject and considering that I use a 7200 in the end I'm in my hand, croaking on the room, almost a 500 mm with minimal focus. Stunning in all with unparalleled clarity (just see the MTF charts). Color rendering is great. With the fact that 1: 1 focuses on infinity, many fashion photographers are using it to open up close-ups of faces with excellent results.

avatarjunior
sent on June 25, 2017

Pros: Bright color images and great brightness

Cons: Price

Opinion: I'm passionate about macro photography and that's why the 105 Sigma is not enough anymore. In addition, a focal length of 180mm allows you to shoot at a proper distance from the subject without the presence of the disturbance and the chance to escape. (Insects) rnOpen the stabilized lens.rnI will also use the first floor.rnUsed on Nikon D750 and D500

avatarsenior
sent on September 16, 2016

Pros: Risolvenza, brightness

Cons: Weight

Opinion: I was looking for a telephoto lens which would allow me to make the most of the sensor of my Sony A7RII, and I must say that with this Sigma (with Canon attack) finally found it. Risolvenza incredible already at f4, at or above my excellent Sigma 35 Art. The definition is still acceptable at 2.8 (in my opinion light years ahead of the Sony 70-200 f4 G). Focus working with Metabones (I do not do sports or hunting, so I can not say giudevo dicarla much). excellent stabilization, because augmented by the "Room". I am exploring the incredible potential macro (it's a genre that I beat little so far). The weight is high, but also because it is a bright tele macro. Pleasant blur. Cost broadly commensurate with the quality. rnAggiorno review after a trip to Iceland, where I made an intensive use. What about: breathtaking. I also tested the focus with birds in flight, and I must say that for my miserable necessity isIt has been incredibly effective (Always on Sony A7RII with Metabones).

avatarsenior
sent on February 27, 2013

Pros: truly excellent image quality, brightness

Cons: the weight and the cost

Opinion: I've only done a few test shots with this lens associated with Canon 6d but I was impressed with the macro definition is in the picture in landscape photos. Despite the weight I took a free hand, the 'objective and well-balanced system of quiet autofocusing, and quick enough especially when using the selector that allows three options focusing 0.47-067m, 0.67 m-infinity and full . Since the diameter of the lens (86mm), the focal length and the weight becomes an objective quite bulky which penalizes the transportability. The yield in the details, however, compensates for these "defects"





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me