JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I've owned it for about two months, and I've already taken a lot of photos of it, from some set portraits, to a bit of street, and mainly architecture, albeit on the road. This was the purpose that decided to buy it, first of all, to be able to use it to take cues and glimpses that would be difficult to obtain otherwise, and to minimize falling lines as much as possible. Of course, if you don't level it perfectly, the deformations will appear, but they can certainly be corrected in post-production. Another thing that really surprised me in a positive way, is that it doesn't even vignette at full opening. It's not just because it's a recent acquisition, but I have to say that I replaced it a few other times during a cruise I did in April. I had the 18-55, and the 35 1.4 to choose from... And it continues. Maybe it's because my type of photography, in this period, prefers a certain type of subject. The fact is that for what it costs, and for what it yields, combined with a truly negligible size and weight, it is a lens that ensures satisfaction.
Opinion:I made an apparently 'strange' choice: I replaced the Sigma 14-24mm Art with this little gem. Strange because the Art is a stellar lens and excellent lenses should be kept. But for a while now, I've been prioritizing portability over any other feature. Because portability often makes all the difference, it makes you put a lens in your backpack that, otherwise, stays at home. There is no doubt that the 10-18mm is a miracle of portability. And also image quality if you consider the size.
Opinion:Switched from Canon 1 dx to fuji xt3/4 less than 1 year ago, at the beginning shock, then taking the measurements you appreciate the philosophy and the study behind the whole system, despite being apsc, but with the noise reduction of the latest version of lightroom I fear nothing. I was going to buy the tamron 11/20 but I was right to wait for this invisible gem. Great Sigma!! I'm waiting for a tele... maybe a 50/140....
Pros:Very small, very light, very sharp. And it's cheap for an f2.8 too.
Cons:Zoom ring that turns backwards, nothing serious, you get used to it.
Opinion:I'm just stunned! The sharpness is impressive and this already at f2.8, and over the entire focal range. Extraordinary. The fact that it doesn't have a bezel I can understand is annoying, especially if you use Fuji from the XT series. But I come from a time when I was using Sony, and there were lenses without a ring there, so I learned how to use wheels. It's true that even on the XE4 not seeing the aperture without putting the camera to the eye is a bit annoying, but I photograph 99% looking through the viewfinder so, at least for me, it's a false problem. On the XH series, on the other hand, the diaphragm can be seen on the upper display, and here the problem just doesn't arise. Slight vignetting at TA and distortion present, but very well corrected with C1. The fact remains that, as I had seen in Abbot's and Frost's tests, the sharpness is exceptional, especially in a zoom that, to see it so tiny, seems a compromise in all its parameters. Amazing what this little gem pulls out, which I remember, is an f2.8!! The corresponding Fuji, which I've used for years in both versions, doesn't even come close. And the Fuji, like the Tamron, which by the way starts at 11mm, is also more expensive, bigger and heavier. Absolutely passed with full marks.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
