|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on June 01, 2022 Pros: Robust, function keys, ease of use, monitor Cons: Viewfinder, battery Opinion: Small tank, although not tropicalized, it resists well to sand and small splashes of water. Manageability is its greatest value: with the thumb and index finger of the right hand you can do everything, even with one hand (for those who have a child in their arms as has happened to me several times, you can turn on and make a "point and shoot" on the fly in a second). Taken by a photographer who "did not find crunchiness in the files" using the 12-32 pancakes, mounted the 12-45 or the 12-60PL the crunchiness comes out of it. Like all small m43, the best gives it with the fixed, both the 1.4 (Sigma, PL or Zuiko) and the 1.7 (15 or 25mm). It is definitely a travel camera and focused above all on photography, even if the video side makes excellent 4k slightly cropped (had they put 150 or 180fps it would have been exaggerated but would have made other Lumix cameras useless) given the great stabilization. Negative sides certainly are the viewfinder (too small and on which you can not mount an additional eyepiece as on gx9, which for those who wear glasses helps a lot) and the battery with which you make just over 200 shots (does not keep the day, so get at least 1 or 2 more batteries). Machine still valid and contemporary in 2022 despite being released 6 years ago: the 16mpx are enough for the vast majority of people. It recharges in the room and this is something that today can only be positive since even a single power bank is enough and in an hour the car is charged. Flash not powerful but very useful in case of need especially indoors, and particularity can be oriented upwards with a finger. If set properly, it also produces excellent jpg ready to be published or printed. Sold to test the Olympus m10 mkii. Regretting the choice. Still recommended today. |
  | sent on October 06, 2021 Pros: Small Handy Quality Sensor Some Interesting Advanced Function Stabilized Tiltable Monitor Mobile Phone Connection with App Cons: Menu a bit messed up Opinion: Absolutely perfect machine to always have with you. Instead of the pancake that is actually not of great quality, associate it with the excellent and very thin 20G 1.7 and you will have a perfect machine for the street. I use it mainly for my walks in nature with dogs, because the mobile phone, however good (Samsung Note 10 +) does not even come close to the quality of this sensor. going out early in the morning or in the evening at dusk I must say that I have never suffered from the scarcity of light. The noise tends to be very low. For landscape photos, typically backlit (sunrises sunsets ...) I use the wonderful function of BKT with 5 shots in bursts that I then mount very easily with Photomatix. Thanks to the wonderful stabilization and the steady hand I can almost always get some satisfying photos. If you are very social, the connection to the app is simple and you can share the shots after a short pp with LR or Snapseed |
  | sent on April 22, 2021 Pros: Almost pocket size with non-pro bleeds, transportability, ease of use and operational speed, stabilization. Cons: Ergonomics, management of high lights, very improveable viewfinder. Opinion: I press that I use M4/3 for work (video) and I delight in photography only for passion. I bought this machine at the end of 2017 to always have with me a high-performance and comfortable photographic body to slip into the backpack for holidays and social occasions. Despite the premises, I have never used it enough. cause? Ergonomics, handling. I found it too small and it gave me back an unin fulfilling shooting experience (also thanks to a somewhat underling viewfinder). Things improve with pro targets (M4/3) but they fall on transportability.. follows, he was often with me, but I did not use it when and how much I wanted/could/should. On the quality and yield of the files (also RAW) I always found it adequate with the kit 12-32 and the 35-100, more than discreet with superior category glasses. After 8,000 shots I think I can point to the tendency to burn the other lights as a defect (the 20mpx sensors do much better). The recovery of shadows is good. Nice and fun 4k photo and post focus technology features. Excellent operational speed and stabilization. Do I recommend it as an everyday machine? If you are used to more consistent and ergonomic bodies you can meet the limits that I have encountered. |
 | sent on March 23, 2021 Pros: Image quality, ease of use, economical, excellent display and viewfinder, PANIC STABILIZATION Cons: Lack of focus selector, short battery, high iso sensitivity Opinion: I was looking for a small, compact machine to carry it around unpretentious and handy. Taken for some landscape and some street at a fabulous price on amazon during cybermonday complete with lens 12-32. For the price paid you cannot be told anything, in my opinion, at an equivalent price it is not much better, it is manageable, it is simple to use, it churns out beautiful raw and stabilization knows its own thing to stay on such an economical machine. Unfortunately the high iso noise is around the corner, you have to know how to manage, between posts and the like I managed to get even to 3200\\6400 but with a little fear of losing the shot, better stay up to 1600 and not go further unless you want to work intensively on the post. Very clean and crisp jpeg, very wide lens range for the world m4\\3, value for money - price unbeatable in my opinion. |
 | sent on March 18, 2021 Pros: Image quality, RAW possibilities, functions, lightness, high ISO seal, ease of menu, excellent viewfinder and display, aesthetically very beautiful. Cons: Small keys for those with large hands. Opinion: When I arrived this morning, I tried it all day and evening, I can already make a pretty complete judgment. The camera is beautiful! Very fun, full of features, some very interesting such as saving an image from a 4K file, or choosing post-shot focus. At night it behaves very well, but in PP you should not overdo it with the increase of lights because it can bring out a little grain. The shadows recover very well. The built-in flash illuminates in a balanced way, does not shoot a strong light. You can add an external flash. Viewfinder and screen are very comfortable and bright, the screen is not completely tipper but it is a factor that I do not care about. New grip with the 12-32mm weighs a total of less than 500 gr. I added an Olympus 40-150mm to complete the optics, but it still didn't get to me. So when I want to go around light, with 550€ total I added a good kit to the Nikon Z6. Rating: 9.5 |
 | sent on March 11, 2019 Pros: Compactness, STABILIZED sensor, 4K 100mbps, swivel screen, good high ISO output Cons: Lack microphone jack, viewfinder not suitable for all situations, JPEG often overexposed Opinion: It is my first serious digital camera, a mirrorless of all respect both in the photographic field and video (which then, who buys Lumix usually has more desire to make videos). It Has the great advantage of being a micro 4/3, so we find lenses both from Panasonic and from Olympus and we can wallow quietly in the market of optics used thanks to adapters. Small, light, and yet you do not miss a nice swivel display and the flash sled (not always present on mirrorless so little). The only lack I heard, making many videos is that of the microphone jack, which together with the stabilization on the sensor (really fantastic) would make it a perfect video camera to start. Great Videos even at 1080p at "only" 20mbps, the 4k at 100 megabits then is beautiful. Good yield at high ISO in photos up to 2000/2500, over the 3200 better not to risk. In The videos I do not go beyond the 1600, only if forced arrival to 2000. The quality of JPEG is good, although often they are a little ' too exposed compared to RAW (on which I have nothing to say, are excellent) and when you go up with the sensitivity the photo is gradually more mixed. The electronic viewfinder often has too saturated colors, underlays, only in some cases I found good, there must be a light right for him. For this, at 90% of cases I use the screen directly. As a first car, in relation to the price, I could not ask for better. The advice to beginners to start with a bang and those who want a second body as a "forklift". Really good mirrorless. |
 | sent on January 22, 2019 Pros: Compactness, aesthetics, excellent stabilization, superb video, price Cons: Electronic viewfinder too small, no autofocus mode selector, no microphone jack, no fully tiltable screen Opinion: In my opinion this GX80 is a real bargain for those who want to buy a mirrorless entry level but has no big budget available. Too bad for some lack type jack microphone and screen tilting at 180 degrees that would make it even more made a best buy for non-pros who want a reliable car to take to travel while being light. Aesthetically I find it beautiful, especially in the two-tone version. I also made a video review... you can find here: https://youtu.be/9ebub8qIlNw |
 | sent on October 08, 2018 Pros: compactness, image quality, stabilization, Ease of use, high quality footage Cons: The usual M43 sensors: dynamic range not at the top, some noise at high ISO Opinion: I had a great time! It is compact but solid, it has a very good build Quality. It is very instant in use, something that makes a difference for non-professionals, especially in critical situations: ease of use makes it harder to miss a Shot. The definition is excellent and personally I have never come across Moirè Phenomena. Movies in 4k excellent by Definition. The touchpad to move the focus point is ideal for this type of camera, where the viewfinder is all moved to the left: I find it comfortable and much easier to use than the equivalent Olympus. The viewfinder is small compared to other mirrorless cameras, but honestly I have not found it bad and I never noticed phenomena of color tearing. As for the colors in jpeg, generally not bad, Canon satisfies me more, but I happened to compare it with Olympus em-1 Mark II in interiors with artificial light and has nailed much better than the white balance. It also doesn't turn green like Olympus, which I personally think is Positive. The stabilization is amazing, especially in the videos, I think this is currently the strongest point of M43 cameras. |
 | sent on August 08, 2018 Pros: Build quality, sensor quality, excellent touch display, photo and video quality, 5-axis stabilization, menu organization, abundant availability of ring nuts and FN buttons, micro USB recharge, relatively low size and weight, price Affordable. Cons: Some incongruity or lack of intuitiveness in the management of certain functions, such as e.g. The preview, the adjustment of the shutter speed, the Tele Converter function and its manual return to the setting of the file quality, WI-FI function available for IPhone but not for MAC. Only discreet viewfinder. Opinion: Except for some lack, it does everything very well and with good responsiveness. It doesn't heat. With the kit lenses (12-32 and 35-100) it is held in hand very well and is relatively practical and light. She is fine with her kit lenses and the shoulder strap in a Manfrotto only 1 holster, forming a small and light mini kit. Jpeg and 1080p video to quality. |
 | sent on August 07, 2018 Pros: Good sensor, aesthetics, post focus Cons: viewfinder, Sciapiti colors, size (not as small as it sounds) Opinion: I came from an Olympus EM10 MII and I have to dive that this machine disappointed me very much... Horrible viewfinder almost invedible image, however a good sensor... Post production mandatory because of the colors Sciapiti (even in RAW)... I don't recommend... At the same price you find much better. I advise you not to make my own mistake... Bet on more... |
 | sent on July 05, 2018 Pros: Suitable for street and beginner (but not for those who are more advanced), Autofocus, JPEG OK, conversion of RAW in the machine, electronic shutter Cons: Horrible viewfinder (compose blindly), tends to overexpose, when in manual you can not set the compensation for exposure (set the ISO automatically and do not know according to what criterion), the noise is already high at 600 ISO at night and in the long Exposures, ISO minimum up to 200, with the Olympus 12/40 is not small, a mountain of creative effects that are useless (I would have preferred a series of simulations series of films and not these crap), battery life ridiculous even for a Mirrorless Opinion: Vote 7 I passed after 4 years of Gavetta from RX100 to A7 II. But I had always remained doubtful if I had taken the longest step of the leg. Maybe I had to go by degrees and try the 4/3? Could I save a little by weight? With the stabilizer maybe I would have achieved similar results by lowering the ISO? The A7II is a machine too obvious and not suitable for certain places? Well, two weeks ago, I got busted by a hostel locker, and the A7 stole it from me. So I had to get a new car and I wanted to give a chance to the 4/3 world and I took the GX80 with the Olympus PRO 12-40. All used at about 700 euros. In the shop looks OK but then after a week you realize the pros and cons. Advantages-Autofocus: shots and makes the photo immediately without hesitation. You can also click on the screen and focus and shoot. I'm not street photography savvy but this looks like the appropriate electronic shutter machine. A big advantage over the A7 but useless if you do landscaping and architecture-converting the RAW into the machine. Unfortunately the modes are basic. I also don't understand why you can't add creative filters in post. However you can fix and share the photos disadvantages... many, too many. It seems to me more a cell phone than a horrible camera-viewfinder. You realize it with the use, not in the store. You never see anything on fire and adjusting the dioptrs is not necessary. Compose at random-exposure meter. It's a little absurd. The Whites burn them often. I shoot the photos by underexposing-1 or minus-2/3. The spot exposure would have the advantage of moving the spot (with Sony being fixed and central) but it seems to me that it works randomly. There's an offset of-1ev from the A7. How does it get a correct reading of the sky brightness equals 0? -Manual exposure. There's the auto ISO as on the A7. But on the A7 you also set the compensation. I want the center of the image A-1 or + 2 holding fixed times and diaphragm. Well on this toy the thing is not possible.. You can are in aperture mode or exposure-to-noise duration. At 600 ISO, at night, you get the noise that the A7 has at 4000 ISO about. With the stabilizer and a focal length of 50 mm equivalent shooting sharp pics at 1/4 of a second. With the A7 I need 1/10-1/12 of a second. So the A7II still has advantages instead of the GX80. Compared to the RX100 I see no differences with the GX80-size. With the 12-40 Pro is not small. If I take other Olympus Pro lenses we are at the levels of the full frame lenses. The costs from new are similar. Maybe with the used is better. You should go on non pro lenses and don't know if I'm going to invest money on this system. It also doesn't go unnoticed and so it's risky in places where you have to go undetected. It is unfortunately pretty and flashy and 6 people stopped me in one day wondering what car it was.. -Unnecessary creative effects. I would appreciate if they were the simulations of the films of Fuji, but these unnecessary effects only waste space in the menu-battery: In two hours of shots have gone two notch on three of the battery. Ridiculous though I've already had mirrorless/compact. It also does not indicate the percentage of the charge |
user70740  | sent on June 01, 2018 Pros: JPEG, Definition, 4k Functionality, Stabilization, Post Focus Functionality, Compatibility with vintage lenses via cheap adapters, wide optical Park, Video Quality, Size, Price Cons: Absence of Jacks, Absence of custom LOGS, Viewfinder poorly defined and in 16:9, Absence battery Grip, battery Life, No Tropicalization Opinion: I'Ve had this little gem for two years now. I came from a 60D that I later sold, survived the arduous choice of having to sell one of my two bodies (A7 vs. GX80). The quality of this camera is undoubtedly high, for a relatively affordable price, the optics are found, some at high prices, others not. The absence of the AA filter allows you to have a higher definition in the shots, really appreciated as a choice. AF discrete, very fast and accurate in optimum light conditions, less in low light conditions. It Has a pretty good monochrome color profile, I liked it and many times it allowed me to forget the post production, it produces some really good JPEGS! Critical of the lack of accessories, a battery grip would have been a godsend given the low battery life (about 300 shots), another flaw in the absence of custom LOG profiles (V-LOG for example) and absence of the jack that, with the excellent quality of the file 4k that Generates + a pretty good stabilization, it would have been an unbeatable mirrorless as a Q/P ratio, but it would then collide with the Panasonic G80 always home (if you're more video-oriented, choose that). Last Note: tropicalization, may or may not serve, here there is. |
 | sent on May 28, 2018 Pros: Fast focus, produces jpegs that make you forget the post production. Definition by Big Show. Option: You can do panoramics in your car without complicating your life with Photoshop, Post focus shots at various focusing distances Cons: It takes you to forget the time you spend shooting, addictive. Battery life just take 2. Small but big-hearted sensor.............. Opinion: Purchased almost for challenge and to test the Panasonic system. After several months of use with various goals under test, I started selling the Canon equipment. With the output of the new 4/3 machines with a menu so useful and versatile. what to say; I'm excited about the car, you take it everywhere with its small lenses in kits that are: 12/32 and 35/100 and when I look in the viewfinder and click, the image satisfies me. Option: You can do panoramics in your car without complicating your life with Photoshop, Post focus shots at various focusing distances and you can join the whole thing in the car. 4k movie being able to use the single frame, etc... Try to believe and you will not regret it. Rated 10 |
 | sent on April 28, 2018 Pros: Menu, quality sensor, 4 k, post picture focus Cons: Heavier than the Xianoyi YI M1 Opinion: Is my third mirrorless despite having a 16 mp sensor against 20 of Xianoyi YI M1 and Nikon has great image quality and performance 1j5. Beautiful menu to me met with bridge Lumix Fz 1000 practical and functional. Almost put my Nikon SLR side Z520 and D5300 looks comfortable and versatile. The viewfinder though is the only flaw of versatility. Definitely great as daily machine. |
 | sent on April 11, 2018 Pros: Versatility & durability, size, performance, stability, personalization, wifi control from smartphone/tablet Cons: weight, battery life, quality of jpg questionable, tilting monitor only horizontally, dispersive, menu options to be reviewed. Opinion: I bought this machine confiding in opinion of others with subsequent reading of specifications and tests on specialized sites. I confess that I had never considered the Panasonic as a camera and especially as understudy to Nikon and I admit that it was a revelation. The machine has its size quite compact but I was impressed by the weight, in my opinion, is felt greatly if put in the pocket of a coat (aim). Though a feeling of strength. The configuration menu is extensive and offers many customization but I think this is distracting and it becomes difficult to easily find the items you are looking for perhaps with some haste. Was then cataloged, grouped by categories styled Nikon, so as to be more quick reference. Eight function keys (physical and 4 4 touch) to which you can assign different operations, plus a quick menu to group some functions to avoid invoking the Setup menu. So far so ok but I noticed it is missing an entry on flash type choice (manual or ttl) that must be sought in the menu. I find this a bit of a limit as well as the function of moving the focus point by using buttons on the joystick. Once activated, the same keys lose their original functions that can be restored only by disabling it. Decidedly uncomfortable. The quality of the jpg directly on camera honestly blown away negatively because it is kneaded with loss of detail, despite the noise reduction has been cleared. Probably is better with photos taken in bright light. I expected a lot more but I consider it a problem almost marginal since only shooting in raw. Definitely for those who use only or even the jpg, could become a problem. The battery while entering at full capacity, does not offer a particularly long autonomy, especially when you begin to use wi-fi and/or flash. Recommended the purchase of at least a second battery with external battery (not supplied). The tilting monitor only on a Board I find it limiting, especially since in one direction, has a very limited rotation. However it is clearly designed for the video makers but who does photography realizes soon limits on vertical picture. Moving on to the positives, for the price paid, I took a car that lets me no matter what. The bolt that comes at 1/16000, focus peaking, manual focus (wanting), af point size, customizing point af, af pixel-precise, double ring, burst at 6 fps from 100 to iso 25600 in raw, AE/AF Lock button customizable for the AF-ON ... so many possibilities, all together, which I did not find the D7100, much less in the D610. All this leads me to use more and more only Gx80, leaving in his backpack the D610. The photo quality even impressed me and I must say that as well at high ISO can return the results more than acceptable, of course with due caution and corrections in post. Paired of good lenses without having to spend not necessarily numbers, quality of course rises and that makes me even more willing to use this machine. Don't mention the video because it's something that just doesn't interest me |
 | sent on October 27, 2017 Pros: Lightweight, compact, practical menu, programmable keystrokes, good af, af touch screen (also by looking at the viewfinder and off screen). Shooting speed. Tilt and non-pivotable screen. Cons: Dynamic range, limit 200 iso for raw. Noise in long exposures. Too stuck / hot pixels in long exposures. I do not look up to quality Opinion: For those who start to photograph and do not want to have weight and footwork is a great car. The limits come out as it is used and of course there are limits if you are able to go beyond the chances of the machine that still gives you good shot even with lenses like the 12-32mm. For the last 5 months I've been using it for the most, and for an amateur it will give you many satisfactions, maybe with more lenses and some professional clicks. RnrnI was very satisfied with the choice, only big flaw for me is the viewfinder that just did not convince me . The adjustable screen is great for photographing with the stand and looking without bending. |
 | sent on May 30, 2017 Pros: Compactness, viewfinder, shooting speed. Cons: No external microphone attachment. Adjustable display only on an axis. Opinion: Coming from the Reflex world, the doubts were not a few but in the end I must say that I am fully satisfied. They can get good good shots from behind half of the weight control and above all in volume. I appreciate the shutter speed that does not regret even semi pro.rn projections. Of course one of the most appreciated features is the stabilizer that allows you to make good photos even with high opening times. The viewfinder is always handy, but the rotating display also allows for interesting shots. 4k modes are interesting but not essential. By giving up a little bit of resolution, it has taken continuous and post focus. In a nutshell the camera makes short movies and in the first mode you can extrapolate the best shots, while in the second one you can focus on different scene bits even after the shot and eventually merge them into a single photo. Interestingly obvious only for static content.rnThe multimedia part for me completely new on a camera: by downloading the app you can in partAnd command panasonic, download photos and then share it very quickly which does not regret the convenience of the smartphone.rnData the nature of the machine I would like a 180 degree swivel display but are really secondhand. RnBecause it does not use much to make videos The absence of mic input on this category of machines is a defect. |
| sent on May 29, 2017 Pros: Dimensions and weight, photographic quality and video, price, stabilizer that does miracles with dual optics, is fast touch-screen. Cons: Inadequate electronic viewfinder in the sun, little peaking focus, less intuitive menu than canon but just make us habit. Opinion: I replaced my 6d with this camera without regrets. Finally perfect white balance in the room and meter that does not burn high lights. Compared to a full frame it is a "Swiss knife" in the sense that pure file quality is backwards, but in the end its many functions make life easier. With the 6D, the recomposition of the scene was a constant while with the gx80 I focused on with my finger touching the touch screen screen. The face recognition function is also good when focusing on a moving subject. |
 | sent on April 27, 2017 Pros: video quality; stabilizer; compactness; Automatic WB; speed sequential shooting Cons: No MIC IN; screen is not 180 °; no tropicalisation; viewfinder; absence LOG Opinion: My opinion on this camera body is absolutely positiva.rnIn summary of the points that I have described as pros and cons they are already saying tutto.rnLa use frequently and every time "take home" some shots worthy of nota.rnLa practicality of a compact body and a good cost / performance ratio make that has become the machine that use with greater frequenza.rnPeccato for the lack of a higher quality viewfinder and the inability to rotate completely the principale.rnUn screen "murder" l ' the absence of a MIC iN jack seen the video quality department, despite the absence of profiles "flat" type of log. |
 | sent on April 24, 2017 Pros: quality 'image, really good video compact 4k with 12/32 lens options Cons: AF slight difficulty in changing the focal movies Opinion: compared to my canon 5d2 images I am excellent and also the beautiful movies with the stabilization that makes very good job, very good impression of solidità.Per now RW2 files are not supported by Windows 10 or even 14 should be converted to Adobe Elements with an Adobe program (converter) which is free, in conclusion as a second (smaller) the body it seems excellent. |
 | sent on April 04, 2017 Pros: It stabilized sensor, compact but at the same time usability, touch screen, choice of objectives, video quality, put to good fire, costumizzazione too wide of shadows and light color, good quality construction. Cons: Viewfinder little snug, low yield is not high lights, the settings menu ordered but so vast that become dispersed, with no high-resolution screen. Opinion: After the last seven months of using this camera in different environments and situations, I think I can give an opinion quite completa.rnPartiamo the positives "far more negative in my opinion", the build quality is not excellent but very good, you makes you feel in your hand has a good grip (though I've added of suppurti rubber) but even without them is not bad, is compact, with the 20mm pancake you carry it virtually anywhere with a purse or the pocket of a winter jacket, excellent for street! RNLA video quality is excellent, the images of the good but not excellent especially in low light, the autofocus in video is not very fast and accurate but with the touchscreen you recover a little, the various functions PHOTO 4K, 4K BURST , POST FOCUS and FOCUS staking are good and leave far too much imagination to use as well as the CUT-4K videos, and the ability to choose a video frame in the most complicated shooting situations when it is notYou can instantly grasp a particular interessa.rnL'autofocus that there is no fast and comparable to that of the Sony a6000 series, but still does its dovere.rnIl stabilized sensor! A great plus in my opinion that even freehand allows shots cpn gain of at least one stop or two! RNLA vastness of the park objectives that can be mounted with or without adapters is exaggerated, I have the standard 14/140 and 20 mm of pana, the different objectives vintage with adapters that give many soddisfazioni.rnrnPassiamo now to the contrary, as mentioned per.prima what the viewfinder too small and little snug, inconvenient if you use it against the light and long, the little resolute screen creates artifacts that will not exist if you go to see the photos in a PC with a high-resolution screen (especially in the sky night with stars on black) .rnIl settings menu, very neat but at the same time so vast that sometimes make you lose the most immediate settings (but cmq with many customizable keys) .rnInfine image quality atlow lights, with the development of the jpg in the car that tends to knead a bit but also in raw returns exceptional detail .rnPS: this is my opinion after six months of fairly intense use, and having terms of comparison having used other machines with sensors from one inch up all'APSC, I am having never used a full frame can not paragonarne functions and qualità.rnSpero will be useful this my review, thanks. |
 | sent on January 28, 2017 Pros: Compactness, menus, optical park, flash, stabilizer, overall speed, jpeg files, videos 4k, creative filters, built-in flash Cons: Battery life, external microphone attack Opinion: I took this camera on the advice of my dealer about the stabilizer, I am really amazed of the structure, steel seems, is dual stabilizer, I can now to use my optical vintage with very different time than a camera without a stabilizer. the menu is very full of features without being tangled. Battery life is a bit ' "ridiculous" in the sense that if you always have the display on, lasts very little. Screen very responsive touch and a very good reading even under the light, what I like most is the reactivity, very good, very fast autofocus, lightning if you set "precise focus," some days I'm trying also l ' af-c with tracking and I feel very good but I want to do other tests. One thing that surprised me is in the last days is that the JPEG file is very good already in the room, in the sense that doing a little 'PP I am having trouble getting stessthe results and this is very positive. Panasonic and Olympus Optical Park exterminated. The videos are very good, with dual image stabilization and electronic stabilization video seems almost shot on a tripod or on a professional equipment, built-in flash does his duty and is equipped with a joint that can be directed towards the ceiling to create a bouncing light, simple but ingenious |
 | sent on September 30, 2016 Pros: Handling, structure (despite being plastic), af, stunning menu, touch screen Cons: Socket for external mic missing, accessories (such as tailored bags not readily available), moiré Opinion: I actually started to take a bit 'of years ago after a "dark" period, I switched from the D3000 the D300S, D610 to return to aps-c with fuji x100t, thought he had found peace because 23 (35mm eq) fuji is a show and the files in jpeg that churns are still on top. But unfortunately in some situations, the fixed lens speech began to Starmie tight. I was never interested in the m4 / 3 and actually still am learning. Talking with a friend who knows rather well both camera bodies that the optics of these devices has convinced me to go to this beautiful panasonic. I bought about a month ago and I can say that I find very well done, from the construction (plastic) but I assure you it seems Steel not to mention the technical specifications. Reviews around you find many so I'll just tell you my simple experience and advice for those planning to move to the m4 / 3. The convenient ports virtually anywhere, I purchased a simple adapter and now I can mount tranquillamente my old Canon FD lenses and goes like a dream, 4K and all the video section are amazing (unfortunately missing the input for external mic, this is a pretty major flaw), practically shooting stabilizing at 1/2 ( leaning against the wall) with no problems there is no sign of camera shake (which is awesome), you have to be certain cases have steady hands in general. Kit 12-32 Kit 3.5 / 5.6 that I took is not great and I'm considering the purchase of other types of lenses. AF fast really well done. These are the first results (more positive), I'll add more as the use, however, it is a product that would definitely recommend it. |
 | sent on July 17, 2016 Pros: AF, weight, menus, optical Cons: It lacks a socket for external microphone Opinion: I purchased this 4/3 to tile to my Canon 6d and outputs read my or my family. Last weekend I was able to test it properly and the result was satisfactory in nearly all lighting conditions. I should point out that the perspective from which the device is sold in kits, ie 12-32. A further test will be made with optical Zuiko of a friend or Voigtlander. For the moment these are my opinions. The flow behind an imperceptible weight, it is immediately ready to shoot. I used it in the priorities of opening but also with automatic Plus (iA +) and I had no particular problems. The focus is fast and accurate. I also took a long duration and even at night hands free. The only drawback, perhaps because of my carelessness occurred when I activated the possibility of 4K post photos with focus. It has worked well, except that I have not been able to restore the traditional shutter system. I tried to read the manual, but no possibility, so I wanted to call for service. Then I thought to "reset" the configuration with the command resets the menus and the possibility of default are back: The problem is not repeated. The definitely I recommend it to those who like frequent travelers and can not always carry around a body FF and .Sicuramente goals do not remain in the fast shots. I posted these images not because they are particularly successful (from the point of view of photographic course), but because they represent various lighting conditions and exposure with which happen to compete. The GX 80 has also been used increasingly free hand at night and indoors. The colors returned (in standard configuration) are beautiful with beautiful green, a dynamic range that enables the sizeable compensation. The video is of a good standard. even with the use of the zoom focus is not lost. however, lack the ability to connect an external microphone. The sound effects are recorded with a valacceptable hours, but in the case of the interviews dell'ambientale control it is impossible and affect the recording in the foreground. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
