JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:It has no competitors, so it's advantageous in every respect
Cons:Nothing
Opinion:Do you like to win easy? You could ask for this goal, which has no competitor. There is a Zuiko equivalent, but if you own a Lumix there is no reason to turn to him. It is handy and offers good results regardless of the price. It's almost unbelievable to carry a 100-300 telezoom with ease. It is also out of place to cause the low brightness to defect, practically 5.6. With digital that allows you to shoot at 800 iso quietly is not a problem, if you also consider double stabilization. Increasing the brightness would have made it grow exponentially and also the price would have relegated it to the purchases of "but do I really need ?". Probably the blurred will not be that of the ultraluminous, those who allow to have in focus an eye yes and one not, that characterize the artistic of the modern photographer (H.C. Besson and Berengo Gardin did not sleep there at night) and on the bohek or as cabbage you write I do not know what to say, since I more or less care how the study of the migration of beetles in southern China... But I also understand that de gustibus...
Pros:Compactness, weight, chromatic rendering, good overall sharpness, dual is, price in relation to the focal excursion.
Cons:Lack of maf limiter, slightly light lampshade, some purple fringing at 300mm (in the raw) where it also has a drop in physiological sharpness.
Opinion:A view certainly of value in relation to the relationship between performance, however good and cost, size and weight all rather low. As far as I'm concerned, portability is the greatest value. I also really like the color rendering. In my opinion, it remains a lens that, taking into account the focal points of which it is capable and the weight it contains requires a conscious use, not very carefree. However the stabilization combined with the G9 if used with criterion is excellent, The construction is plastic but discreet. The lampshade in my opinion is built in a slightly too cheap way, probably the worst of those of the various optics that I have possessed, as a little too light and mounting it on the fly does not always the hooking takes place with confidence at the first shot. The Af seems decent to me if he is not asked about miracles. Overall, it is advisable if you are well aware of your needs. I did not try the older brother 100-400 but from what you see around it should be optically better but at a cost almost triple and at twice the weight (which in the long run could require a monopod), as well as vexed by some inconsistency such as the hardness of the zoom ring and the construction of the lampshade that for me remains a mystery.
Pros:Double stabilization with the bodies of the same brand, size and weight, tropicalization.
Cons:Lack of a standard collar.
Opinion:Taken in order to have a light and compact bike set-up, despite having better optics but much larger and heavier (in a relative sense for a m43 system, but always small and light in comparison to larger sizes); the optics go to marry perfectly with machines like the G9 but it was intended for use with the GX9 for the reasons above. Despite the dual IS requires a minimum of practice to be best used at the most pushed focal points, as the danger of movement is always around the corner. With times below the limits achievable with the double stabilizer, it would have been useful to provide a ring with attachment (possibly ark) for the tripod while instead you have to resort to the after market (I find only a product made by a German craftsman, however very expensive). I do not see it as a major flaw since the optics is born mainly for freehand use with a lot of light (which is then what I need, exits in MTB in broad daylight). For its scope of use therefore excellent, a full 9 I would say.
Pros:Price, compactness and weight, tropicalization, sharpness, excellent stabilization with the dual is. Built with quality plastic and fluid ring on the entire excursion.
Cons:I own it recently, for now no one. A focus limiter would be useful.
Opinion:It is an excellent lens that can easily be carried in the high mountains without the need for a sherpa. Very clear up to 260mm, there is a drop in sharpness to 300mm, is comparable to that of the various lenses 150-600mm for full frame to f8, but remaining at f5.6. The autofocus is quite reactive even on a gx80, in the less contrasted conditions it is hard to hook but I fear depends on the camera, probably on a flagship will be great. Stabilization is excellent, but when you do photo shooting it is good to maintain high security times to avoid camera shake. At 600 mmeq I never get under 1/200, even if on the forum there are sharp shots with much slower times. I totally feel satisfied with the purchase.
Pros:Solution, incisiveness, chromaticity, vignetting, chromatic rendering, weight, size, anti-dust, protected by splashing water, also works at low temperatures, hood, stabilizer, fluidity of the zoom ring
Cons:Lack of zoom lock (but not a problem), it adds up
Opinion:When you buy an optic like this I already know what you are looking for and want, so I do not go into surplus descriptions. "This product left me literally astonished because I did not expect great results and instead I was literally" shocked " If I think about the current market value I'm even more surprised and you'll forgive me if I let you say that in my nourished optic park this is the best (subjective opinion). rnWe're sorry, I found a great lens resolution, incisiveness and an incredibly natural and pasty bokeh despite the seven blades of the diaphragm. There is no noticeable presence of chromaticity that for charity will be there but cropping the picture I can not see in any way and no focal length.rnThe vignetting is limited.rnEasy to describe is the chromatic rendering can not be due to the obvious (visually) treatment of the lenses or to others but the colors are faithful and acc es, do not turn them on the heat upThe cold. The "bellows" of the zoom I remember being dust-proof, sketch-proof and able to work at low temperatures has a gentle, hard, soft, gentle manual excursion that does not allow for a casual ride during use transport (there is no manual zoom block, but it does not work in this case) .rnThe image stabilizer is incredibly efficient considering the focal length and is a delight to use it.rnThis optic is equipped with its indispensable hood, weight and size transmitting a feeling of "balance" and practicality. "I'm absolutely convinced that this lens will give many satisfaction to anyone looking for an optical product in this focal range.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
