JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:is no longer produced, deterioration of anti-glare treatment
Opinion:With a vast Olympus past, I've always snubbed this lens, sinful of arrogance. It is a grandiose lens, crisp already open from edge to edge and with a very rich contrast. I got my specimen for free because the front lens is veiled. I tried to disassemble it and then discovered that veiling is not an internal fungus but a probable oxidation of the anti-glare treatment of the anterior lens right on the outer side. I tried with a bit of everything but it was not possible to remove the veiling. I then replaced the bayonet by mounting a Nikon F adaptor and did the first tests on a D850 and a D200 comparing it to the 135 f2 DC and the 80-200 f4 AI-S two illustrious and out-of-the-question lenses. Well, little Zuiko 135 immediately showed his whole class playing it on par with the two sacred monsters mentioned above. Unfortunately, the veiling is seen a little with a slight nebulous effect that barely penalizes its contrast (already good even with this handicap), but this does not prevent you from using it, because the results are still respectable. Rating: a nice 9 to 10 over-deserved. To the admirers of 'vintage' I say: 'never again without' MA... ATTENTION: referring to the veiling mentioned above, I have verified, also on other specimens, that this lens has a certain tendency to point on the lower -inner- top of the front lens. It's NOT repairable. On a positive side, even if it affects the whole lens, it does not spoil the quality of the image but in the backlight. Personally, after trying in vain to eliminate it, I cannibalized another 135 who did not have the defect.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
