JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Size, speed and precision AF, sharpness already at 1.8, pleasant bokeh
Cons:Plastic but solid construction
Opinion:Taken because I wanted a normal without having the weight and footprint of the 1.2 PRO, I found myself on my hands a little jewel. Had previously the panaleic 1.4, bhe..... I must say I prefer this! Panaleica has a better bokeh hair but to be acceptable you had to close it to f1. 8 so we're there.... the zuiko is already excellent at TA, faster and more precise as AF, sometimes the panaleic ciccava fire (on olympus bodies). Less aberrations at TA, the Pana instead up to f2.8 suffered heavily (always on oly bodies). Bokeh very pleasant within the limits of the format. It makes good on both near and far subjects. Closed by a stop becomes a blade all over the frame. For me best buy, I didn't expect it.
Opinion:I have this lens for a few months, purchased used to replace the Sigma 19 because the latter has never convinced me completely. The Zuiko 25 1.8 instead I find it an excellent lens in terms of optical quality, with a very accurate color rendition, excellent contrast and micro-contrast and a very high sharpness from opening up to F8 both in the center and at the edges. In my opinion is usable to maximum up to F11 then the image quality begins to degrade due to diffraction. Also the AF is very fast and quiet. The build quality is good even if the barrel is made of plastic material (polycarbonate) and is equipped with a series of lens hoods always made of plastic. The most obvious defect I have found is a chromatic aberration at the edges in high contrast situations (e.g. branches of trees against the clear sky), however correctable in PP. Ultimately, at the price of the new that I find a little high, I think that for those who appreciate the standard focal the Zuiko 25 1.8 is a high quality optics that deserves to be taken into account.
Pros:Sharpness, image quality, portability, fast AF, lens hood included.
Cons:Build quality (many plastics).
Opinion:I bought this lens because the format m4 / 3 is equivalent to about 50mm, and I was looking for a good quality fixed. I'm satisfied. Vivid images, excellent contrast, focus speed and lightness are its trump cards. The advantage of 'minimum aperture (1.8) allows good results even with little luce.Un Another advantage, according to me is the price is not excessive compared to the competition (the other 25mm I had considered was the Pana - Leica 1.4). Minus points, in my opinion, the build quality, not just sublime.
Pros:Image quality (sharpness, micro-contrast, color rendition even at TA), bokeh, light weight, AF speed, portability, lens hood (!)
Cons:Slight chromatic aberration in high-contrast areas and sides of the frame at RT.
Opinion:Another horse battle system m4 / 3. It is a lens that is difficult to find fault: the only one, I say it now, it's a slight chromatic aberration that is often present in areas of maximum contrast at the edges of the frame. Just to be clear: the aberration is less than the amount PanaLeica 25 1.4, another lens system reference, which I will try to make a short raffronto.rnRispetto PanaLeica 25 to 1.4, the Olympus is lighter (136 grams versus 200) and a little 'more compact (56x41 vs 63x54): obviously the PanaLeica has the advantage of opening a minimum (1.4 vs 1.8). The minimum distance of 24 cm MAF is OLYMPUS vs 30 cm of PanaLeica. The lens hood (supplied at last!) Is less prominent than the equivalent Panaleica.rnDal point of view of image quality, sharpness is practically a maximum already at room temperature and almost over the whole frame. Little vignetting. The color rendition and microcontrast are other strengths of the lens: saturated colors andnatural. The bokeh is very similar to that of PanaLeica, perhaps a little 'more decisive. rnL'AF is fast and preciso.rnSe then look for a handyman fixed quality, for outdoor and indoor, from portrait to landscape to portrait painting set, this is-along the 25-PanaLeica a great choice. rn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
