|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on September 12, 2020 Pros: superlight body cap Cons: fire lever moves by itself. obvious distortion. Dark Opinion: bought for its palious cost and negligible weight and footprint. For a picture of landscape in full sun is fine and makes up for the lack of a super-enlargement that you did not bring while this is in the pocket of the shirt and if necessary does its humble work. Of course, if you photographed monuments you will have to correct the distortions in PP |
 | sent on November 30, 2019 Pros: Size, price, sharpness. Cons: Lever of the "MF"slow, Diaphragm too closed. Opinion: Taken for the paltry price and arrived in the late afternoon I wanted to immediately try it out and I was disappointed immediately! I couldn't take a clear freehand photo except by raising the iso causing noise, from the despondency I would throw it! Then I tried to shoot with the help of the flash and things changed .... seemed like another goal, excellent! So I waited the next day with the sun. Tested with daylight is fine !!! For now (I'll update later) the downside is the diaphragm too closed and the lever of the focus variation that moves if you change it. From my point of view, I find sharpness better by moving to hyperfocal than to infinity. |
 | sent on November 24, 2019 Pros: sharpness, shooting field, limited deformation (can be a con), size, simplicity, focus, price Cons: ad f/8 decidedly dark, focus lever with unsteady stills, with the small bodies of Olympus risk framing your fingers Opinion: Olympus doesn't even classify him as a target, yet he manages to allow images of extraordinary sharpness (in my opinion). Once the focus stick is adjusted to infinity, just compose and expose, without worrying about sealing. Using it, I take care of three things. Do not touch the focus stick, which is not held firmly in the three preset positions (macro, hyperfocal, and infinite), and which normally adjusts to infinity. To keep the electronic horizon active, to properly align machine and horizon. To keep your fingers as far away from the lens as possible, so as not to photograph them. To my taste, the deformation imposed by the focal is not a defect, but a compositional element to have unusual images. Fixed f/8 diaphragm in practice does not get in the way that much. If anything, you need to adjust the shooting contrast, as with good light the extreme areas of brightness will be both present. In the end, I found out that this plastic thing is addictive... |
user109536   | sent on November 19, 2019 Pros: Small, light, very little Cons: Nothing given the price Opinion: It is a lens to be taken as it was conceived without going looking for the fur in the egg. It is a fish with all the characteristics of this type of lens. It is evident that the quality is not comparable to much more expensive goals, but with a little care, good light, a flash shot, shooting in RAW you can get great results. It's also so tiny and light that you can always put it in your pocket. Should. |
  | sent on October 17, 2019 Pros: Smaller than two screwed filters, stick closure, feather weight. Cons: As a habituation. Opinion: Last Sunday I was at a public event, for a customer, behind the inevitable fence, in front of me a wooden leudo at the Old Port and I mount this lens to take two photos together. At that point from the boat they nod me, go up that our official photographer did not show up. When I'm on the boat I notice that the bag with the optics is left to my wife, behind the fences. So I did all the service from this boat, right above, in the middle of flags, sails, elbows, rigging. 9. The photos were liked. yes, I did a little PP. but sharp, balanced, I had remained in the same condition with a fixed of other focal would have been much more problematic. What to say, I bought it as a joke, saved me from a situation that could end not well. In other situations, easel and well in bubble, obvious not at night, from interesting architectural perspectives as well as rural or marine landscapes. Pretty shot colors and medium high contrast as I like, shadows a little closed and unworkable. But for 92 coffees, thank you for existing!! |
 | sent on June 11, 2019 Pros: Cost, lightness and size Cons: It's a fisheye so it distorts Opinion: Bought used without box and instructions, does not need it. Find space anywhere because it is tiny and super light. It is worth much more than its negligible cost (practically that of a professional memory card even among the largest) because it allows you to make those photos typical of the fisheye without having faked or carry bricks. I didn't notice any side darkings. The sharpness is just under measure, but for the angle of field framed you may not go to see the fine detail. |
 | sent on December 22, 2018 Pros: Dimensions and excellent for very special photos (use moderated) Cons: F8, very poor optical quality. Opinion: Rating: 6. Lens to use for photos not of high quality but to remove some whim. unusable use with low brightness as indoor or evening, given the opening f8. Quality/Price a bit low (considering that Canon sells at about €120 a 50 mm f 1.8, not excellent but good). It is still a very comfortable and pocket accessory. |
 | sent on November 13, 2018 Pros: Price Cons: Almost everything Opinion: A missed opportunity: fixed diaphragm at F8, short focal and of course no retrofocus. With a minimum of commitment, but a minimum, you could build a lens from the extraordinary surrender. With a few euros more, considering the next sales volume. The pocketability would remain similar, there would have been a few more grams. Does anyone remember the Zeiss Hologon? |
 | sent on November 12, 2018 Pros: Very small makes the camera pocket, very easy to use, good value for money Cons: Maybe F8 fixed Opinion: Recently purchased lens during a visit to Perugia, considering the cost I think it is a great accessory should not be missing in the kit, simple to use, if you seek different perspectives will entertain you surely, certainly you can not expect the Pro lens sharpness So far I've had good results, it has to be used in favorable light conditions given the fixed diaphragm to F8, simple to use the lever to decide the focus. Overall with a few euros you have fun and you get familiar with a different type of photo. Recommended for those who have a bit of creativity. |
 | sent on September 24, 2018 Pros: Wide angle of 18mm in the 35mm format, fixed focus, compact, front closure of the lens with lever. Cons: Poor sharpness, plastic Opinion: Not high quality lens, in fact..... I usually for close shots I match it with a flash shot of the machine to increase the image quality a bit. The lens has a 3-position lever for fixed focus; close-to-medium-infinity. So you should not focus and you will always get an exact focus. For the amount that costs is fine, but do not count on obtaining well-defined images. |
 | sent on April 22, 2018 Pros: Tiny, lightweight, cheap and fun. Cons: For what it is nobody. Opinion: I read various critiques in internet to this subject but, in my opinion, anyone who criticizes him is almost always because he didn't understand. Compare this to other fisheye lenses that, when it's good, costing more than twice is silly, this in fact is a kind of alternative to the CAP that you put on your car when you don't have lenses mounted, is plastic, has fixed aperture at f8 and the focus is manual in just three little provisions of which is infinite. It may seem a thing unnecessary and instead for what it costs in my opinion worth the expense, it's fun and if you learn to use it can give amazing results. Obviously one cannot expect yield and exceptional sharpness, distortions and aberrations are not lacking and moving away from the Center the quality goes down, but it's fun, it must be used in the right way to take time to do some test, become familiar with the focus puller and play on defects instead of thinking to fix them, the better it with black and white, or with film grain filter art. That said if you have a passion for pictures fisheye or wide angle thrusts and times quality and sharpness is then the case to look elsewhere. |
 | sent on February 09, 2017 Pros: Intuitive, tiny and lightweight, the aberrations (if taken advantage of) give a look to the photos SOLE, used vehicle comes off at 50 euro ... Cons: fixed iris sometimes a bit limiting, minimum distance maf not exactly uplifting Opinion: taken in jest and without great expectations, he was missing a fisheye in neo-kit mft. I was amazed by a whole series of aspects. In against have not shown much, but let's face it, it is full of flaws: the fixed aperture makes little usable in low light conditions, it is not a sharpness sample, the minimum distance of maf is not reduced as expected and when framing light sources (both natural and artificial) generates a series of horrifying aberration but ... beautiful! and this is the point: if you consider the price and weight down and you enter in order to exploit the flaws to their advantage, knows prove a small notch that gives a unique mood to the photos! We must NOT ask him very clearly and even a correct behavior. It is little more than a pinhole which deforms, a sort of vetraccio exquisitely Lomo flavor which, if included, knows unleash the creativity of the user. rnSe are looking for a classic fisheye, clean and the sharpest, look elsewhere or think in any case to a coaching (whatwhich will soon even I, throwing on MFT or an Olympus Samyang 8mm Pro occasion) .rnda use is intuitive to most, just five minutes to familiarize with the lever with three positions fuoco.rnMi we enjoy, it makes me mad, not begrudge on ISO and then PP even more the image dirt, estremizzo, the violent without thinking too much: the result satisfies me, despite the beginning has blown away when not used in optimal light conditions. a lens that is not a lens, from the creative potential unattainable in relation to its cost. Brilliant and beautiful, definitely unique ... rn |
 | sent on January 05, 2017 Pros: Simple to use, effective in the results, really comfortable in the dimensions Cons: Given the price, no one. Opinion: Great for photos "artistic" or ultragrandandolari unpretentious, I use it in sports ambiete to resume across the playing area (eg basketball or soccer) where you do not seek after the greatest detail, but sufficient sharpness to obtain excellent results for the purpose of publications of articles or web cartacei.rnOttimo for street photo for the same reason mentioned sopra.rnrnE 'clear that it can not be compared in invoices and features to PRO series lenses or cmq that cost at least 2/3 times più.rnrnLo advice strongly !!! |
 | sent on November 05, 2016 Pros: Fun, good photos can come out after all Cons: Plasticky, fixed f8, but then is a coprisensore with a hole Opinion: Thought more like coprisensore that aim, it is an idea after all carina.rnOvviamente seems more a toy than a lens, but if necessary proved decent, to make wide scenes, and photos within città.rnHa much distortion (it's a fish-eye, after all), and it remains to f8 fixed .... the focus is manual, and divided into 3 positions ... one for infinity, a middle distance and one for short distances .... It never used the latter. Percent euro you can even think about taking it |
 | sent on September 01, 2016 Pros: Price, portability, quality. Cons: only f / 8, plasticky. Opinion: Objective "fun" that allows unusual camera angles. If in good lighting conditions the image quality is quite good considering the fixed focal f8. In relation to the cost of any other fish-eye on the market it is SPECTACULAR. Really consigliassimo. Careful only not to abuse too. |
 | sent on August 11, 2016 Pros: Price, lightness Cons: f8 Opinion: For what it costs, does its good work! Unpretentious, it is a useful accessory to keep in your purse to have some fun 'with diversi.Non looks you can experience much: the f8 it greatly limits the use in good light conditions. PS: Watch your fingers, which end happily in framing the edges !!! |
 | sent on April 06, 2015 Pros: Price and size Cons: color rendering and sharpness at the edges Opinion: I love to use this body cap because it can often create interesting shots. You have to get a feel of the lever 3 burners available, the rest is a lens to be much more than the price that it costs, useful for those who want sperimentare.chiaramente you can syndicate of sharpness or chromatic aberrations that, however, in conditions good light were found satisfactory. We loved it! |
 | sent on December 13, 2014 Pros: dimensions, discrete optical quality, good sharpness Cons: no one Opinion: is a lens shooting fun to experiment with fish eye type (in fact only covers 140 °), without having to invest big amounts of a lens which then has limited use unless you are scholars of the genre, is constructed entirely of plastic but of good quality, to always wear, weight and size almost nil. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
