JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Manually.rnProbably indestructible.rn Solid construction
Cons:Inevitably soft af / 1.4. But already af / 2 changes a lot
Opinion:The pleasure of a manual "manual" lens, where you control (both pleasant) mechanical both the focus and the diaphragm. Used on an Oly EM1, where it becomes a 100 mm canvas for portraits, even at full aperture. There are few focusing issues, very simple. Extremely clear from f / 2.8 included.rn Compared to a standard lens with auto focus it is another experience, mechanics have a more human being. I'm enjoying it, a classic case where the bounds of the object become a plus compared to an "all-automatic" .nnBagged on Ebay, in good condition, coupled to the EM1 with a K & F Concept Adapter (which unfortunately makes the button unusable close the diaphragm, defect is manageable.) i would like to try it on an analog body (like 50 mm true).
Opinion:Just fantastic, in the past I have tried so many 50 1.4 but found them worse than their 1.7-1.8-2 by excessive flare and other optical defects. This Olympus I in "Auto-s" is really stunning from every point of view. Flare minimized, excellent sharpness from f2, just enough to 1.4, built so well that in 100 years we will see more in giro.rnLo blurry to me like it is soggettivo.rnIl price is about 100 € for a well maintained exemplary and with caps, unless you are not perfect specimens with perhaps the toughest nuts or mold / fungus also best left stare.rnCostasse € 150 I wouldnt!
Pros:Size, excellent mechanics, ring soft focus and fluid, filters 49, optical yield very uniform
Cons:Soft to f1, 4, (but acceptable given the brightness)
Opinion:I found a review in March 1993 with pictures attached diagram risolvenza that says ".. a normal race, very bright, that certainly did not fit between the cost optical. A confirmation of the excellent results that can be expected from standard optics, and if the weak point are internal reflections they are justified by the large maximum aperture. " The behavior is classic, or the yield is very uniform across the central, middle and peripheral growing risolvenza with the closure of the diaphragm. RnPersonalmente, I appreciated the ability to reproduce even the most subtle tonal passages, and, using it wide open, to maintain a good contrast. rnL'esemplare in my possession has a nice amber color of the outer covering of the front lens, which I have not found on other objectives of serie.rnDa carefully reconsider its use in digital, especially with the APS-C format, to get a tele with brightness f1, 4! rnrn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
