JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I bought this lens to get closer to the macro world and for economic reasons I preferred to start from the basic model so as to point to the PRO 2.8 60mm; I thought I had to be satisfied and instead already from the first photos I found it easy to portray the details of the microcosm, shooting freehand. Sometimes he struggles to focus, but once reached he hardly loses it: they are not able to decipher the behavior as a defect of the lens on close subjects or instead a weakness of the focusing system of the OM-D5 MII. For its practicality of use I find it fun thanks to the satisfaction of leaving the house light ready to shoot, with excellent results. For price and details of the photos, I highly recommend it
Cons:Perhaps the lack of the hood, and diaphragm 3.5.
Opinion:I bought this lens without many pretensions, a macro that can always serve, and instead I found a respectable lens, optical quality that I consider crazy bright colors, sharpness, tried and tried several times more than appreciating it I tried immediately to find the defects but really I did not find them (at least for me), because I had only one thought in my head: it costs too little, who knows where the rip-off is...
Pros:Lightweight, sharp from the whole aperture, bright colors, economical
Cons:Maybe lack hood... but is it needed?
Opinion:I have it recently, I wait for spring to try it intensely. For now I am very satisfied with the purchase. Purchased used by RCE made me really good first impression with the exits looking for the first blooms. It seems to me more than adequate even for general use, although it is not too open. I reserve a more articulate opinion when I have used it a little more.
Pros:Minimum distance, good yield, VERY LIGHT and not very bulky
Cons:NOTHING if just opening 3.5 (but in macros it is not so disabling)
Opinion:Purchased used for a few euros I wanted to experiment with this optics I consider myself satisfied, from the really low weight you can also put in the pocket of jeans at rapid optical range (in the sense that I also use it in the street and therefore I put it and I often remove it from the body) does its duty as a macro precise and lightning focus both on Md 10 II and on Omd M1 II.
Pros:Af very fast and accurate. Lighter. Economical. Minimum distance
Cons:Not very sharp. Bright colors, but mixed
Opinion:I wanted to try this 30 mm due to its minimum distance macro and greater ability to use given that corresponds to a 60 mm, but I regretted. Nothing to do with his older brother 60 mm. I don't find that very sharp also the colors are strong and mixed. Take much advantage the micro contrast that has nothing to do with the sharpness. I'm disappointed and I think soon I will sell
Opinion:At the time of the analog to a certain point I had replaced the 50 1.8, universal, with the macro 50 mm 3.5, very clear, and I appreciated this quality. After many tests with other optics I came to the choice of a time and I realized that I had at my disposal what for me is truly a universal perspective. They alternate with other fixed and always short lenses ranging from still life to street, rarely macro, the AF is as fast as that of many other Olympus lenses, quite fast for the street, but not suitable for nature shooting, even for the focal length . This lens has found a precise space in the bag and the quality of the images will make me forget its flaws.
Opinion:Lens purchased more for the sake than for need. Immediately emerges the high sharpness at the center and the minimum focusing distance (about 14/15 mm). Unfortunately, 30 mm are a bit "short" but they are useless. It's a lens created for macros but also (and I add, above all) for still life. RnUnica fails, in my opinion, the diaphragm too closed: it had been a AF / 2.8 lens would be the TOP.
Pros:High sharpness at the center and top edge, high magnification, high proximity to fire, no distortion and significant aberrations, compact light, very fast autofocus for a macro, focus is internal.
Cons:Opening only f3.5 (which in the macro is not a fault, it is only because it can not be used as a portrait target), no fire limiter
Opinion:The goal is certainly a best buy in the Macro field, since it is the cheapest macro target for m4 / 3 and has high performance despite the poor opening and vabbeh that the macro is not a decisive one. The lens is sharp at full aperture and sharpness grows up to f5.6. There are no significant chromatic aberrations or deformities as in the panasonic cousin, blurry is nice. I highly recommend it for both the macro and the still life.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
