Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS : Specifications and Opinions

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS, front

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS, back

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS, top

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS is a tele lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2020 to 2025 (discontinued). The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price was 993 €;

25 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

Specifications
Focal lenght	100-400 mm
Angle of view	12.3 - 3.1° (equivalent to a 202-808mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	4/3
Max. aperture	f/5-6.3
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	21 elements in 15 groups
Min. focus distance	1.30 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.28x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	72 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1120 g
Dimensions	86 x 206 mm
Buy
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Rhoken

sent on 22 Dicembre 2025

Pros: Price (used), build quality, weather seal, autofocus, 200-800 mm equivalent in the size of a 70-200, sharpness up to 300 mm, macro, multiplyable

Cons: The sharpness drops physiologically to 400 mm, if you multiply it you can only use it at noon in summer, the stabilization is pitiful, it has a minimum of play

Opinion: Lens mistreated since it was announced but honestly those who mistreat it strongly have probably not understood WHO this lens is aimed at. It is not a lens aimed at professionals and those looking for the highest quality, defects are common for a consumer lens and the price from new was not low but even there where is a cheap 200-800 mm? That said, the lens does what it promises very well: to offer a fairly affordable birdlife lens for those who want to attend this genre but without spending a mortgage offering more than good performance even if not at the level of a PRO lens. Up to 300 you have a very good quality while at 400 mm at long distances you can see a certain physiological drop in sharpness while at short distances it remains stable even at 400. The AF is precise and does not seem to slow down the OM-1, the build quality is solid with a fluid dial although I notice that my sample has a minimum of play on the bayonet. The stabilization is really pitiful and it is better to use the IBIS and surprisingly it is multipliable, but since it is already dark on its own (f/6.3) multiplying it makes it usable only at noon. In terms of price, honestly it is worth taking it only if you can find it for less than 800 € beyond that figure it is better to take the II version which has a considerably better stabilizer

Esse

sent on 10 Febbraio 2025

Pros: Focal ratio. Robustness. Minimum distance of maf. Weight and dimensions with respect to angle of view eq in ff. Adequate AF (with light. But so much without it is not very usable). Once you understand how to use it, you take home great images in practice. Used price (between 800-900eur). Multipliable (more theoretical than practical advantage)

Cons: Little contrast compared to pro lenses. Maybe that's why beyond a certain distance it gets worse. Zoom a bit hard. Less pleasant to use than other pro lenses. Stabilization. In the photographic field I have more consistent results and it seems better to me using only the ibis of the camera body

Opinion: I've been using this lens for almost a year now. The results are very very good up to 10 meters. The closer you are, the more satisfactory the yield. over 10 meters it gets a little worse in my opinion. In general, there is a little less contrast than pro lenses, which requires a little more careful post production. In good light conditions, however, the situation improves. My sample has a better yield at 400mm than at 300mm. AF is quite fast

Loriga Ivan

sent on 16 Maggio 2024

Pros: Very good focal range, great robustness, good lens hood and adapter ring

Cons: Weight, zoom ring a bit hard and with few degrees of rotation, not optimal sharpness, stabilization

Opinion: I have owned this lens for a year now I also had the 100 400 panalaica which I was more than satisfied with and which I sold reluctantly, after about a year I bought this one which is perhaps slightly more contrasted but with a less pleasant blur and less intense colors, the sharpness in this lens is not the best at least my specimen, The stabilization of the lens is almost useless always deactivated since the one on the sensor is clearly superior, a good advantage is to be able to use it with multipliers but on the other hand it loses sharpness further, even the focusing speed is not great my vote is a 7

Emanuele Lucchetti

sent on 23 Novembre 2022

Pros: Build quality - Light weight - Compatible with 1.4x and 2x teleconverters.

Cons: AF good but not bright, suffers in low light - With teleconverters should only be used in emergency... Acceptable photos.

Opinion: I had this lens for over a year and used it on the Olympus E-M1 Mk3. I can not say that it is a bad goal, indeed I found it well done (excellent construction) and comfortable in use as well as being light and cheap. The photo quality is excellent in the right light conditions. The same goes for AF, with low light it trudges on the contrary during a sunny day the AF is very reactive. For close and stationary subjects it is excellent with very good results (sharp and color-rich photos), for those in flight it is good. It makes little sense to compare the M.Zuiko 100-400 to the 300 f/4 as it represents two different optics and born for a different audience. Even the price range is different, the 100-400 in the used market can be purchased for less than a thousand euros and for this price I believe that it is an excellent telephoto lens compared to the good photographic result that returns.

user210403

sent on 24 Aprile 2022

Pros: Difficult to find merits

Cons: Stabilization,zoom ring hardness, non-bright autofocus

Opinion: Do I say so? but yes... It is one of the 100-400 most "ugly" I have had... Optically it is not at the level of the other 100-400 for ff and apsc.. But you could also turn a blind eye to this... Up to 300mm all in all it is not evil, then at the top it loses a little and "tarnishes" a little ... However, if the light is good and the short distance brings out some beautiful photos already at full aperture. But the real downside is the dislike you feel in using it... "Serious" thing in the micro 4/3 house where generally it is the pleasure of taking a strong point .. Lens stabilization not compatible with that of the camera (they do not add up, you have to use one or the other). The stabilization on the optics is poor, weak... I always keep it off. Fortunately, the stabilization of the camera puts a piece of cloth on it... But it is an uncomfortable and unpleasant mechanism to use on such a long telephoto lens... The zoom ring is very hard and woody... This creates considerable problems when you have to zoom in sports photography or in photo hunting, because it causes you to lose stability while working and shooting. The autofocus without infamy and without praise.... It's certainly not as accurate as the 300 Pro and is not compatible with the 25-50 FPS of the OM1. The problem at olympus is to fill the gap between the 40-150 Pro and the 300 Pro... this 100-400 does not... The 40-150 PRO optically with the tc could fill this void, especially with the 1.4x is very valid, but unfortunately it does not make it on the continuous autofocus side, with the multipliers it loses a lot. So the problem remains.. It would take a 50-250 F4

There are 3 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS

Great spotted woodpecker (f)

by Ivano58
75 comments, 3486 views

Ardia di Sedilo

by Ginolimbianchino
68 comments, 2128 views

Tuft gauze

by Norvegia04
106 comments, 1653 views

Great spotted woodpecker (f)

by Ivano58
67 comments, 2947 views

Super moon in Madrid

by Papimoto
15 comments, 2139 views

Bucks

by Ivano58
55 comments, 1310 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Grey heron

by Norvegia04
100 comments, 1283 views

Wallcreeper

by Ivano58
50 comments, 1137 views

Lucherini (m)

by Ivano58
69 comments, 2176 views

Lucherino (f) in spring.

by Ivano58
55 comments, 1577 views

Lucherino vs Great

by Ivano58
61 comments, 1926 views

Hawfinch ?

by Ivano58
61 comments, 1074 views

Lucherini (m left f right)

by Ivano58
58 comments, 1776 views

Great spotted woodpecker (f)

by Ivano58
53 comments, 1939 views

Little bittern

by Ivano58
44 comments, 903 views

Lucherino (m) on aggressive landing.

by Ivano58
57 comments, 1630 views

Red squirrel

by Ivano58
33 comments, 924 views

The black devil of sparrows. Sparviere

by Carlitos
13 comments, 4389 views

Goldfinch

by Ivano58
58 comments, 1285 views

White

by Ivano58
68 comments, 1761 views

Great Spotted Woodpecker

by Ivano58
55 comments, 996 views

Grey heron

by Ivano58
54 comments, 1110 views

Swamp rabbit

by Ivano58
43 comments, 756 views

Bee-eater

by Ivano58
43 comments, 880 views

Kingfisher (f)

by Ivano58
45 comments, 1101 views

Bee-eater

by Ivano58
52 comments, 1316 views

Blue

by Ivano58
58 comments, 1557 views

Lucherini (m)

by Ivano58
49 comments, 1053 views

Bucks

by Ivano58
47 comments, 794 views

Hawfinch ?

by Ivano58
46 comments, 973 views

Goldfinch

by Ivano58
48 comments, 1296 views

Great Spotted Woodpecker (m)

by Ivano58
37 comments, 835 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Blue

by Ivano58
46 comments, 920 views

The embrace of the sun

by Papimoto
8 comments, 992 views

Father and son

by Nike
15 comments, 2890 views

Lucherino (f)

by Ivano58
39 comments, 639 views

Kingfisher

by Carlitos
11 comments, 4714 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think?

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS