RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.2 S : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.2 S)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on July 29, 2022

Pros: all

Cons: costs a bang

Opinion: The perfect optics. Beautiful, imposing, superb construction. Despite this still manageable and balanced: on Z6II with original BG it is a solid and portable whole. The sharpness at full aperture is incredible, as well as the speed and precision of the focus. And then the magic... As for detachment and three-dimensionality' has practically no rivals to this focal. Perfect flare resistance and creamy and very pleasant bokeh, even with distant subjects. Maybe Nikon took thirty years to make a 50 1.2 AF, but now that it has done so it has silenced everyone else. Perhaps the best Nikon lens ever produced. Of course it costs, but it's not a Mitakon... I dare not imagine what he can do in the hands of a true marriage and expert portraitist!

avatarjunior
sent on March 30, 2022

Pros: Sharpness, blurry, construction, IQ

Cons: Weight, size and cost (but it's worth them)

Opinion: A controversial lens, in the sense that it has a crazy quality even at f 1.2, quality directly proportional to the size with really crazy optical performance. That said, I must say that it returns pure magic, shots with great personality and characterization with a sharpness at full aperture really surprising. I also own the 50 z f1.8, excellent and much cheaper and more portable but that can not be compared to the yield of this one 1.2 ; as said by others it is a lens "out of mind", in everything . In low light this lens behaves beautifully, the bokeh is creamy and progressive, fast autofocus. It is not an everyday lens or occasional street, but if you have in mind particular projects this optics certainly helps to realize them. Is it worth buying? It's a very subjective evaluation, the cost and the weight towards the little brother 1.8 are coniderevoli, but when you shoot at 1.2 you forget that maybe you were crazy to spend that amount for a "50ino". I have also used a sigma art 50 1.4 in the past, but here we are on another planet

avatarjunior
sent on June 12, 2021

Pros: all

Cons: Just the weight.

Opinion: Taken and tried on 24/70 2.8 Z I got the instant desire to monetize the 70/200FL to convert it to the Z version, thanks to the cash discount of 200€. But, having experienced the high iso seal of the z6II, I wondered if it is not worth waiting for a 70/200 f4, more for a matter of footprint than weight. And so I let myself be "screwed" by this 50 1.2... what do I think after about fifty shots? I think it's a lens that freaks you out. Already being able to use it at the maximum opening, with eye detection, finding out-of-focus only because you go below the minimum distance of maf would justify its purchase. For 24/70 2.8 Z I sold the 50 Sigma Art, to blame for its blurry and the yield in high lights. I am not a great technician but I felt too different from my other lenses, which are all Nikon; so when I decided in favor of this 50 and not for the 70/200 almost I almost felt like a pirla spending a lot of money after just giving up a 1.4 more than good. All this speech valid until the first shot with a 50 1.2S mounted. After that first shot, of these lines, you'll only see that "freak out"

user58495
avatarsenior
sent on February 04, 2021

Pros: All

Cons: Costa

Opinion: The perfect optics. Beautiful, imposing, superb construction. Despite this still manageable and balanced: on the Z6II with original BG it is a solid and portable whole. The clarity at full opening is incredible, as is the speed and precision of the focus. And then the magic... As for detachment and three-dimensionality, it is practically unrivalled to this focal point. Perfect flare resistance and creamy and very pleasant bokeh, even with distant subjects. Maybe Nikon took 30 years to make a 50 1.2 AF, but now that he's done it, he's shut up everyone else. Maybe the best Nikon optics ever produced. Of course it costs money, but it's not a Mitakon... I dare not imagine what he can do in the hands of a true matrimonialist and experienced portrait painter!





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me