|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on February 19, 2018 Pros: Sensor, ergonomics, weight, quality of files even at high ISO, robustness, GPS integrated, wifi Cons: Few configurable buttons (one!), Menu a bit 'cumbersome, live view slow, pentaspecchio (no pentaprism), no engine af in the car Opinion: Taken second-hand (practically unused) to replace a Fuji xt-10.I wanted to regret the jpg ready to use Fuji and instead, despite the sensor a bit 'old, I had to change his mind: it's a still great car capable of producing high quality photos with a dynamic range of absolutely high level already with the 18-55 and with very little noise up to 6400 iso.Ergonomia perfect for me since it offers an excellent grip combined with a low weight and size equal to that of a mirrorless without having the defects (the usual: small body, small keys and unbalance between the camera body and mounted lenses). Even after hours that you carry around not tired.The AF is very good, fast and accurate in 99% of the cases and 39 points are more than good though obviously the sports photo is not his bread also because of the limited 5fps burst. The adjustable screen is very comfortable, robust and helps not just for the most difficult shots while the viewfinder, despite not is a pentaprism (unfortunately% 29 is not too dark and I definitely prefer it to an evf (at least to that of Fuji that in itself was not bad at all). With this 5300 frankly I do not see the advantage of using a mirrorless if not to play with vintage lenses, which I did and I find it fun but that leaves a little 'time that finds. I do not think I'll get tired so soon because for my needs as a simple enthusiast it offers everything you need and even more with very high level performances. if I had to change it I would orient myself on a seire 7xxxx only for the pentaprism and the af in the car to be able to use any Nikon lens: for the perfect rest! |
 | sent on February 10, 2018 Pros: Lightness, versatility, numerous optics, easy to use Cons: Slow GPS in the acquisition, slow live view, read subexpositions Opinion: I had this camera for r years subjecting to all sorts of use .. I have to say that my overall impression is that it is a very good camera, even for the countless features and features it has. Unfortunately, the GPS is one of its sore notes: in addition to the inconvenience of having to download from the nikon site, every 15 days, a file updating the position of the satellites - otherwise it does not hook them - the positioning is very slow if you have the habit of turn off the camera after each picture. On average, every 500 travel photos taken, I found no more than 20% georeferenced .. Also the shot in live view is very slow and strongly discouraged if you have to give a sequence of photos .. For the rest nothing to complain if not perhaps a general under-exposure in scenes in the shade or with overcast skies. Excellent battery life .. |
 | sent on September 24, 2016 Pros: Wide variety of goals, lightweight, adjustable screen, video at 60fps fullhd Cons: It tends to overheat quickly under the sun Opinion: Very light and versatile good when you have to shoot for several consecutive hours, has nothing to envy the big sisters in terms of performance, only sore point autofocus goes a bit slower than the semi-professional equipment but speak just tenths of a second, with latest firmware have placed many problems that plagued this machine as the live view so slow. What about beautiful car. |
 | sent on August 30, 2016 Pros: Lightweight, adjustable screen, sensor Cons: Focusing, Live View, Opinion: Weighs nothing can carry it always around, the expeed4 has her why and swiveling monitor is comfortable (although very nn) the sensor used is like that of 7100 (maybe better) .rnPOI BUT DO THE sorrowful notes, rnho thought about doing qlk snap between the birds, and I noticed that the focus especially if the light fades mmmm does not go benissimo.Allora I said, established that the focus on longish distances nn goes, we use the live View we focus and then snap ... Auguriiiiiii ... if you are using the live view, and go to zoom into the monitor goes to scatti.Pertanto for domestic use, is it ok if we talk about landscapes or nature pay attention. |
  | sent on August 24, 2016 Pros: compact and solid structure. Controls arranged in a similar way to the D5200 / 5100 etc ... wifi, gps. image quality, faster AF, and more Cons: Nothing... Opinion: younger sister of D5500 but with a few differences. The leap in quality by buying the D5300, the D5200 I noticed going from whom I respect a lot and known primarily an abyss from the D5100. When people ask me a valid reflex to start, etc ... I always suggest this! True, the market there are other cheaper models but why not start right away with a valuable product? I use it almost always coupled to the Sigma 105 macro. If you look at the macro picture in my gallery, there is no need to add altro.rnLa SLR has wifi and gps really do not use. 39 AF points are really comfortable. The sensor is fast, there is articulated monitor and the macro is really convenient. What about ... buy it! |
 | sent on July 25, 2016 Pros: very good sensor, holds well at high ISO, articulating monitor, full HD video at 60p Cons: few direct commands Opinion: It 'was my first digital SLR after a past with SLR analog and then digital bridge. I decided to buy it after many comparisons with other cameras on that price range (560 € kit with 18-55mm VR AF-P does not Nikon), and I chose it for the presence of the latest sensor EXPEED 4, for articulated monitor and because among the entry level is the one that allows you to shoot video in Full HD at 60p (in anticipation of learning to shoot some video) .rnPer now I feel good, I use it with a Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 Contemporary and with Nikkor 35mm f1.8G, are really very satisfied! 35mm with ISO 800 at night offers some truly unique shots buoni.rnLe flaws for those shooting in Manual are the scarcity of buttons for adjusting ISO, AF mode, position etc. so diretto.rnAltre things that would have been comfortable: the slot for the second SD (backup) and the 'internal AF to use the old Nikon lenses. But then it is an entry level, can not be considered defects! RnUn 'last criticism concerns the software to control the camera remotely tramite WiFi: photo transfer works well, but have not yet ever been able to see the monitor and perform the various shooting settings via the app on android ... Almost as if there was not this function, I hope that sooner or then update the application on your smartphone to solve ... |
 | sent on April 30, 2016 Pros: tilting the display, sensor generally good (not excellent resistance to high iso but decent, sharpness), jpeg quality, excellent quality / price ratio (taken again to 440 €), weight, excellent video (1080 50p) for max 20min, additional functions such as GPS, wifi, battery life Cons: Camera shake, live view slow, slow buffering, the viewfinder covers 95%, does not support many goals (af-d, and the ais, af old ... pretty much just af-s), it does not have the internal engine of focus, He does not preview in the viewfinder, for some functions you need to expand a little 'hands. Opinion: Socket 440 Euros, for this price is phenomenal. I state that I am not a professional. Before I had the D3100, D5300 paid about 500 ... this is a whole new world. The tilting display is very useful and convenient, if they did live view faster would be perfect: this is in fact essential for a preview of depth of field, but to shoot in this mode takes almost one second (even at 1/3000 ). The videos are truly remarkable. Suffers from shake-especially on objective non vr ... will be many mpx of DX. But all in all this is compensated by the good performance at high ISO. An excellent machine body, comfortable, with a great sensor (no low pass filter and with 24 mpx that give out details) that produces sharp photos. I do not know the difference compared to D7xxx, but certainly this has given me great satisfaction! |
| sent on February 12, 2016 Pros: Sensor, high ISO performance, sharpness even in kit optical, swivel monitor, ergonomics, WiFi, GPS, lightness, quality / price ratio Cons: af slow in Live View, AF problems with optical third party Opinion: amazing machine: for what coast offers a stunning picture quality. When combined with Nikkor 35 1.8 G or the Sigma 18-35 1.8. bring home the shots of a crazy sharpness. In my opinion gives the best in architecture and landscape photography, thanks to the resolute sensor and the lack of low pass filter that by a small "plus" in churning out the hidden details, while in sports complaint pictures some limit the shooting interval (5 fps) and for the buffer, even if the af if the dignity quarry. Excellent video quality and the convenient swivel monitor. Rather "hilarious" WiFi and GPS capabilities, especially the latter, which can reveal valuable in hiking allowing you to turn on tracing the movements. In essence: a concentration of technology and IQ by nearly professional machine, all at a very accessible price. The sensor offers the most with the Nikkor 35 1.8 G, the Sigma and Tamron 18 35 1.8 70 200 usd vc 2.8, but with the lasttwo suffer some af uncertainty. In summary: a little gem! |
 | sent on August 30, 2015 Pros: Compact, pivoting display, 24MP, Wi-Fi, GPS, dynamic range and quality jpg. does not have the sensor of the D7100 or D5500 .. it is a unique model and NOT Sony, held at high iso commendable. Cons: There are no unnecessary functions, other curious (video thumbnails, for instance). Had the internal engine to use non AF S, you could use a lot more lenses. Opinion: As the body rides also has "too much quality", lightweight and ergonomic as the second body in the ceremonies (with the handyman Tamron 16-300) it is highly reliable. I find it curious videos in thumbnails and absolutely useless the "night vision" available only with AF in live view. The use with a 800mm catadriottico to photograph the Moon or with 14 Samyang for the milky way with some success. So a versatile body, simple to use. Missing some things, control depth of field, for example, and the engine for optical S Af not but after all if these functions are essential there is the Nikon D7x00. The goal with which works best is the 40micro. New evidence from a distance 5-15 meters with 300 / 4.0 PF and excellent yield, almost prefer the files that bakes in this pairing than those of the D610 - Soon I'll put pictures .. |
user58495   | sent on July 28, 2015 Pros: Lightness, white balance, held high ISO, dynamic range, Wi Fi, GPS, screen swivel Cons: Lack of direct access function buttons, Shooting in Live Wiev slow, missing button control depth of field Opinion: Lightweight, easy to carry anywhere, has made at high ISO and dynamic range absolutely exceptional, like many models professionali.Resa sensor resolution and even too high (shake-conscious ...!), Comfortable viewer rear swiveling in all directions and very robust, it allows daring shots without making too many sforzi.Sensore precise autofocus even in low luminosità.Manca button control of the depth of field that the DX is ESSENTIAL, because the sensors of this size have to base depth of field very estesa.Manca also the possibility of setting the AF system, this MUST, especially for optical third parti.rnOttimi colors, excellent ability to load custom Picture Controls (Capture NX), Jpeg the highest level that can be used immediately, wide dynamic range, is unrivaled who can do the same in the same range prezzo.Dà impression of strength despite the weight leggero.Il sensor gives the best with3B very slow and the built-in stereo microphone records the sound of FA. |
 | sent on June 13, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, adjustable monitor, wi-fi integrated very convenient, autofocus, quality-price ratio Cons: The Achilles heel is definitely the live view which is really slow making it almost unusable. It would have been nice if they added the button of depth of field. Opinion: The Nikon 5300 was my first body macchina.Tuttavia I had the opportunity to try other nikon and canon of medium-low and confrontation emerges undoubtedly winner. Its sharpness is exceptional enough to make the pictures with lenses "kit" very sharp. The grip I find it very convenient, even if certain controls are a bit 'awkward to reach. |
user50345 | sent on March 27, 2015 Pros: Great sensor, monitor swivel, ergonomic handle Cons: Af points, few direct commands Opinion: I took the 5300 coming from Canon, fascinated by nitidizza and completeness of this machine. Has absolutely nothing to envy for what they say to the sister 7100, rather than tests the sensor is working better and better, the new xspeed, high pixel density, the complete absence of the low-pass filter, a yield level of definition in general good , a grip slightly closed, compact and easy, allows you to easily reach all the controls unless one does not have the hands of a child. It lacks a bit to have it all and having to fiddle around a direct snap to the additional features. Highly recommended. |
 | sent on January 28, 2015 Pros: A GOOD SENSOR and autofocus 39 points, along with some interesting funzioi as: Monitor 3.2-inch Vari-angle, Wi-Fi (convenient for remote shooting from smartphones or to publish immediately) and GPS. Cons: few physical controls but obviously it does not cost as the older sister D7100 Opinion: I bought it as a first camera body and I must admit it was a nice step up from the bridge. The sensor, the same as the D3300 and D7100 sisters, has a very high image quality and is certainly his biggest asset. I decided to sell it because shooting almost exclusively in manual by the time I felt the lack of physical controls on the camera body. For those who would use it not only automatically, decidedly hammer the D7100 (if I azzardado buying this upper body but with the same sensor, I'm sure I would have no regrets). I recommend it to anyone who wants a camera body but basically snaps in Automtiche mode or P, A, S, thus guaranteeing a body from a small size easy to transport (although the small body is not necessarily an advantage). |
 | sent on November 30, 2014 Pros: sensor, autofocus, monitor articulable Cons: not autofocus with all AF, dislocation buttons, limit "constitutional" the APS - C Opinion: This camera is the flagship of the amateur as well of the House, and with these shares the remarkable limit of not being able to control the auto-focus lenses without an engine inside, which unfortunately excludes a number of lenses also recent, in contradiction with the fact that those who buy these cars would save, drawing on the used market for the goals. Having said that, nevertheless presents a plethora of very interesting features in its market segment. The Raw can be 14-bit (possibility denied the D3300), but one can not choose the compression (as in D7100). The points of focus are 39, a record in this price range. The monitor articulable represents a benefit of great use in various situations. As for the sensor, its yield is even better than that of the D7100, as it is interfaced to a processor of the next generation, whose algorithms allow to "shaping" something on the electronic noise. Sore, which betrays its economic origin, is the position very tight angle of the timer button, located at the bottom next to the junction of optics. Finally, the resolution must always be remembered that the high density of pixels and the absence of anti-aliasing filter can nothing compared to the objective concept of spatial resolution: the same goals that we can use in the full format work on higher frequencies, resulting in an inevitable decay yield MTF. |
 | sent on March 26, 2014 Pros: RobustarnUn good sensor .. able to give more and more optical pregiate.rnWiFi .. for certain things is very convenient (used for remote shooting .. like "Remote Control" rnDisplay swiveling Cons: Commands .. uncomfortable to work in manual you have to do yoga with your hands. rnCon little or very little light is almost impossible focheggiare.rnIl worst fault is the incredible slowness of the Live View shooting. Opinion: 26ugrave; slow but not so long time .. very worse than those of any bridge economia.rnrnSi can lock the mirror in the open? .. The D5300 can only work with the electronic shutter in liveview? rnTroverei more comfortable that management buttons sensitivity and shutter settings are within reach of your right hand, perhaps with the selection wheels rather than the base dell'ottica.rnrnLINK oF VIDEOrnrnrnrn[URL=]https://vimeo.com/105430063?utm_source=email&utm_medium=clip-transcode_complete-finished-20120100&utm_campaign=7701&email_id=Y2xpcF90cmFuc2NvZGVkfDc5OTFmOTJhODJhMGQ5Y2UxZDIwMzcwMjFiODVjMWQ2NjAxfDI3NDM1OTU4fDE0MTAwMTkxNjJ8NzcwMQ%3D%3D[/URL]rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnRISPOSTA OF NIKONrnrngrazie for choosing the service Nikon Support Center, rnih regarding its description of the operation will not be shown to be a problem and there is no demand feature, of course, it will be able to carry out a check on the proper functioning of its D5300 from our technicians laboratory andin this regard can turn in Italy at Authorized Nikon Service LTR www.ltr.it and in order to take advantage of the guarantee may refer to the retailer where the purchase with a copy of the purchase document and warranty card was made for ' forwarding service, or go directly to the laboratory referred to in the indicated below contacts and references to additional information http://www.ltr.it/contattirnCordiali greetings, rnSupporto customers NitalrnrnrnConsiglio the D5300 to the Reflex fans nearly as well, in emergency you can use the live view for some statto. For all others, followed Juza to the mirrorless Sony or Fuji..rnrn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
