JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I have a weakness for this reflex is old ... but to me a great, great reflex that I left my heart and that I keep carefully. My totaled more than 450 thousand shots and has never given me any problems. Of course, today the little use because I believe that it came to the limit. You deserve the rest! There are other born after her to do his duty. It used for a long time with a nice Nikkor 70-210 ... old, old even he that even today, with its limitations does not disappoint. Until some time ago, I used the D50 with the M42 adapters and I can guarantee that I made the Bokeh shots clearly superior to newer SLR. Online can still be found and prices are good. Do not forget that this reflex has its years and you can not expect that much, but if you need a "school ship", you can start here.
Pros:Body robust, second display, battery life, image quality, internal AF motor, the price of used (January 2014), light, convenient buttons on the back, the quality of RAWrn
Cons:Yield at high ISO (up to 200 good, 400 good, 800 and 1600 if properly exposed: enough), Absence of the second ring, the second display is not backlit, accepts cards from 2GB maximum, small and dark viewfinder, lack of function keys more advanced, dynamic range by over 400 iso su.rnJPG on camera.
Opinion:Great car in 2013 can still tell her! 6 MP genuine, top-quality optics with the right offer nuances and details fearful. Good sensor but trudging above 800 ISO up if the photo is in color, otherwise up to 1600 without any problems. It costs very little, is backwards compatible with the optical AF and Ai. Council to match it to the fixed or zoom quality and avoid similar 18-55 et. We will provide a lot of satisfaction, I recommend it to those who can not spend a lot and wants to enter the real world of photography. Do not worry about "only" six megapixels, enough for a PC and can guarantee a poster-size prints if you are good at shooting. E 'with bracketing and once you learn to use it you'll be glad to have a car equipped with this function. I would recommend this or the D70 + AF 50mm 1.8 + 2.8 + a 70-300 zoom + flash and at a cost equivalent to buy a nikon 3xxx series will have a more complete kit that will give you higher quality pictures if you are willing to commit and volerle well :) rnAll'inizio photos seem to give little contrast and dull, but using RAW will open a world nuovo.rnNe'm in love and I will change only to move to a newer model that reflects my new needs.
Pros:Price (who now is the era of second). Robust, much of the current entry level. Machine somewhere between a entry level and a semi-pro., Has the breaketing, the second display and an excellent synchro flash of 1/500, and especially autofocus motor inside! Good performance at high ISO (up to 1600 and get up to 800 defends well)
Cons:The second display is not lit (what it cost enlighten .. mah), no get up mirror and delayed shutter release. Missing the second ring (for shutter speed and aperture), and the commander flash, depth of field and many key programmable keys. Viewfinder is not very bright and does not cover 100%
Opinion:I've made so many shots, excellent training ship, has the functions a bit 'more advanced than classic entry level and the possibility of using AF is not insignificant. It has a good yield, and up to ISO 800 is usable and it performs well, the synchro flash to 1/500 comoda.rnNonostante the very thing I did 6mpx stampre to 30x40 with a good resa.rnIo I bought 3-4 years ago used to price of 150 euro with 2nd battery, and I think that he still roams on that figure. Costs very little and many soddisfazioni.rn
Pros:The price. By the time it was good. The alternative was the Canon 300D. Robust camera body, I say it after 30,000 shots, and manageable. Battery life.
Cons:Does not have the top panel illuminated sensor mediocre over 400 iso, no get up mirror and even the key to verify the depth of field. Viewfinder dark and small.
Opinion:I decided to go to the D7000, after almost six years and 30,000 shots, almost exclusively for the performance of the new sensor. With the D50 I took pictures that gave me a lot of satisfaction (all those present today in my portfolio were taken with the D50), and only the birth of my three children has led me to want a change just for the performance of the sensor. If you are considering buying a used one, as the first body I highly recommend it, especially for the price, which is now expected to be around € 200 scarce.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
