|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on February 27, 2020 Pros: Discreet sensor, price of used today in 2020 Cons: It's Nikon's cheapest series, and it shows. Opinion: It is a small machine, easily transportable, reliable, with all the merits of a reflex and the conveniences of the pre-set aids. I talked about how you can also exploit full frame lenses on dx machines in my channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbIdp3DUDqB-C1Aqn9KMAXQ/ It can not have claims because it is the entry level however, given the goodness of the sensor, it can produce beautiful images if you match a valid optics. Today you can buy it for very little and it can be great for those who approach the world of photography although honestly I would very recommend a series like D80, D90, D7000 that are like quality and usability another planet. Vote 7 |
 | sent on January 12, 2020 Pros: Everything you need to get started: price, raw file, ease of use, presets Cons: All you need to continue: ISO 800 maximum, ergonomics, af, viewfinder etc... Opinion: First love is never forgotten... Great camera to get started and for the less experienced who maybe just want higher quality than simple compacts. Easy to use, raw file quality very acceptable, useful presets and automatic modes that allow you to take your first steps in the world of photography. Low price and small size. Of course, once we have practiced, we realize the limits of this reflex (as with any entry level) like the ISO 800 seal we are already at our peak, the burst, the small viewfinder, the few points of focus, the ergonomics, the double slot, the fact that you always have to enter the menu for adjustments, lack of automatic bracketing function and much more... with good optics can still be very useful as a spare machine body for unprofessional use |
 | sent on September 20, 2019 Pros: Very high-performing for an entry level, cheap (in 2019 you find it less than 200.00) intuitive, ergonomic, excellent quality of materials and then it is a Nikon. For those on a tight budget and especially for those who want to do PHOTO and not video, social and blah blah blah... Definitely the best to start with. Cons: Missing the internal engine of the autofocus (but it is an entry level), in the evening from ISO 800 onwards is not the maximum (but it is an entry level and pure aps-c), burst just enough (but it is an entry level), live view let's leave it alone (but do you have to take photos or videos?). You will not be able to sell it, you will pass to the next body FX machine holding your beloved D3200 with all the kit as a second body because it will be true love. Opinion: Buy in 2016, a used practically new (0 shots) a stroke of luck. Coming from the old analog photography and then forcibly passed to smartphones I decided that for my newly born daughter I had to have something that guaranteed me real photos (as well as studying photography techniques). D3200 18-105 a winning pairing. Initially used automatically, then RAW-JPEG, now only manual RAW iso 100 (usually), little flash and optics: sometimes 18-105 other 35mm 1.8 depends. It is always an entry level so the top models of the same series can have a slight improvement of the high iso but just a macula, the real jump you had compared to the old model d3100 (which got to try). The native 24mpx provides a truly enviable image quality, a machine that deserves to be used in manual and RAW and not automatically as a simple "point and click". Have the pleasure of establishing the aperture of the diaphragm and the shooting time according to an expometer that works well. 11 autofocus points that allow you to decide the optimal focus with respect to the subject and cmq up to ISO 800 in the day are fine, in the evening even with the flash I would not push beyond 400. Because in fact the only thing that unfortunately you can not have compared to a d800 onwards is a high iso yield that allow you to get to 1/4000-6000-8000 sec. But those are full frames and cost a bang as sensor is large and therefore photoreceptors - large" yield salti better. This is an entry level (even from the d7100 onwards the iso are better but they are always aps-c) so always work at ISO 100 and in RAW pays a lot and if you ever want to develop (I now almost always do) the photos obtained even in 50x70 format you will notice the image quality. Finally the JPEG obtained in post production is much better than the JPEG obtained by the camera, that's why I say: better RAW. Great camera for street photography and especially for portraits (the optics I recommend that are the ones I own are 35mm dx - 18-105 dx - 55-300 afs dx), festive trips and whatnot. A real gem. True... But the movies aren't much... But I have to take pictures... lacks Wi-Fi... But the RAW I have to move it into post-production. Expensive options let's leave them to those who work and really have needs of this type, for those who really love photography and especially love to always learn - to take beautiful photos will understand that the moment he decides to switch to full frame the d3200 will remain his second body Machine. Who decides to stay in aps-c will perhaps opt for a d7200 as the first body and the d3200 as the second. As I said before, "a little jewel." |
 | sent on January 18, 2018 Pros: He takes you by the hand and takes you to unknown places like AF, FPS, ISO etc. thanks to the pre-settings. Nobody has to be ashamed in using the presets. And what strikes me the most is the sing-song of the PRO "do not use it automatically (I miss you catch the plague) but use it in manual only so you will learn!" Cons: Several that you discover them all when you're more PRO but in the meantime you care if the ISO is not so dramatically performing? Opinion: December 2013-January 2018rn4 years and use of the D3200. In four years the phrase "use it in manual!" is more ethically incorrect. The D3200 has in fact some delicious programs of photo capture that - showing the basic parameters - let you know that in the landscape it is better if you open the diaphragm in a certain way and set the ISO to a certain value and so on. see a great entry level that gradually knowing you will provide a setup that returns results appreciable.rnWhen all advised me to change and buy a more performing camera I began to buy optics.rnTamron 150-600, Tamron 70/300, Samyang without engine and so on.rnI wanted to see pushing the camera with different optics how it would behave.rnGiudizio ottimo.rnAn curiosity, a couple of years ago came a micro-flea in the mirino.rnPortata in the laboratory I was told that it was open and so on. For the first two days, I saw nothing but the flea, and then I never saw it againerla for another two years.rnOra is for sale.rnVoto: 9rnrn |
 | sent on December 27, 2017 Pros: Price, portability, excellent start Cons: high ISO and personalization Opinion: My first SLR, good to start (I have combined with the 18-105 and 35mm), you immediately get in tune with the nikon system and its settings. The tightness at high ISO is not too satisfactory, already at 800 ISO is at the limit. In short, the advice to start and keep a few years to become familiar, then you feel the need for an update. The best side is that it weighs little and is small and portable. vote 8 |
 | sent on October 15, 2017 Pros: Weight, Size, Workable RAW files Cons: ISO Holding, Dimensions, Engine Failure AF Opinion: The classic basic entry level, good to start and understand if you can chew the photo or not, but also for the unpretentious cameraman wanting to have a full manual camera control. It also allows RAW images to be saved, so even the latter can have full control of the shot result using RAW management software. Weight and dimensions are a double cutter for this car. On the one hand, being small, it's easy to take in hiking or hiking (I personally took it to a trip to Spain, which I would not have done with the D610), occupying little space, but on the other hand the small size certainly does not help the camera. rnThe ISO seal (of course) is embarrassing. Already at 200 ISO noise is present, making it highly disturbed already at 800 ISO. But being a lower end entry level, it could not be otherwise. Moreover, the impossibility à to use the automatic MAF with lenses D or anyway AF (without internal motor) is a pretty annoying thing. |
 | sent on July 15, 2017 Pros: Good to get started Cons: Bad to continue Opinion: The nikon d3200 boasts a cargo of defects but also of value: it can keep the company at the beginning but after a couple of years it almost practically loud to be replaced. If the promise of megapixels cares novelties, after a while the noise / iso ratio becomes a discriminant. It also lacks some functions that are not overly fundamental, but which nevertheless make the possessor a proud owner of a slightly pussy compact. No mirror-ups, ISO up to 100, noisy noise, tiny viewfinder unsuitable for manual focus, physically very small for those with bigger hands on the face (it also depends on the face). In return he does his job, more or less well. If you overwhelm the accessories it increases its life cycle, or endurance. In essence, the d3200 is like the first love, intense but uncompromising |
 | sent on July 12, 2017 Pros: Small size and weight, great sensor, easy to start, but not only. Cons: Lack of double ring, need to enter each time through the menu to activate / deactivate functions, 800 iso limit (if you want to have quality images), no exposure compensation, reduced AF module of 11 points and shutter speed . Opinion: I have this little Nikon for nearly 4 years. It was my first Digital Reflex. Acquired in the Kit with the classic 18-55 VR II, I started moving the first steps in digital photography, coupled with an ever-growing mastery of post production. I immediately felt the need to match an optician worthy of the name, replacing the classic plastic. Initially I replaced the 18-55 with the good Sigma 17-70 C f / 2.8-4 (really a good lens), then I joined him with the amazing Tokina 11-16 f / 2.8 DX II and a Tamron SP 70-300 VC USD. In a relatively short time I found myself with a good kit that covered me from 11 mm to 300 mm. The small D3200 has always been a faithful traveling companion, never abandoned me and has always given me so much satisfaction. It has a very good sensor in my opinion, coupled with quality optics, gives excellent images, making it easy to work on RAW. Passion then with time has grown and with it also the desire to have something more tender.The only negative aspects of my little bit (but we're still talking about a Entry Level) are: lack of double ring, need to enter each time through the menu to enable / disable functions, limit to 800 iso (if you want Have quality images), exposure compensation shortage, reduced AF module of only 11 points and shutter speed. For the rest nothing to say, really a great machine with which to practice and get good results as well. Now I also have the D300S / D700 (phenomenal coupled) and the D7200, so the small D3200 is now in disuse, but it will be very difficult to free it. |
 | sent on July 05, 2017 Pros: Good, light, compact and easy to use Cons: Lots of noise already from 800 iso! For the rest nothing more than relevant Opinion: My first reflex bought about 4 years ago that I still own even after purchasing a ff ... Very convenient to use despite the only timing and opening adjustment ring.rnLight, compact and easy to start ... L "The only big problem I think is the high ISO, already 800 iso there is a lot of noise ... But I have to say that iso 100 is a monster! The 24mgx gives a great picture quality and the dynamic range is not bad at all. Even now use with the d610 and I have to say that although a ff is much better in so many things (iso hold, double ring, double display etc. ) Still gives me great shots! |
user103989  | sent on November 04, 2016 Pros: Good to start Cons: Very few points AF, AF inaccurate in low light, backfocus (at least in my case), just a few commands, No Bracketing, Noise at ISO 400, too dark and lacks the viewfinder grid. Opinion: It is the reflex with which I started taking pictures, but after a while 'I realized that it has its limitations. It is very easy to use but if you want more, you have to look for other better performing camera bodies and a better AF module. Has a too small viewfinder and dark and sometimes you get lost while dialing, especially beginners. |
  | sent on October 14, 2016 Pros: Cost/Quality ratio: for 300 euro with objective 18-55, difficult to ask more: so much yield at a negligible cost Cons: In shots below 1/200 you should shoot in live view. The blur that causes the mirror is too obvious. Lack of fire micro-adjustment Opinion: With good lighting The 24 MP's are all exploited. And it's a show. Very manageable and compact with the retractable 18-55. A note on sharpness: If you measure on MTF test cards, you realize that shooting with and without a tripod in Live View, there is an abyss. So it's pointless to think of using super sharp lenses if you take photos on the fly. Compared to the d7200 it definitely goes corrected the sharp of a few tenth. On seal to ISO: Dxomark the DA good up to 1130 ISO measured, which correspond to 1600 of room. Big difference lies in the development of the RAW: definitely recommend Photoshop compared to NX-view especially for incarnate and yield gradients. If you develop in Dxophoto lab you get good photos even at 3200 ISO excellent for portraits, landscapes, macros. Less suitable for use with driven telephoto lenses (500-600 mm) for limited high ISO hold (but shooting at F 8 to 1/1000 at 800-1600 ISO in good light conditions is not that difficult. A function that is lacking and that could be useful is the HDR and of course the autofocus microcalibration. If you use it with good lenses eg 50 1.8 G you will make beautiful portraits all in a featherweight. If you want the sharpness in the landscapes: try 18-55 to 18 F 8 on Tripod LV and you will be amazed by what you can give this machine if you then use Samyang 14 F 8: You'll love, a lot of yield at a negligible cost learn to use the technique well and Post and see yourself what you will get from these good photo machines |
 | sent on September 23, 2016 Pros: Handling, good value for money. Cons: Missing bracketing. Opinion: The machine itself offers roughly what the competition offers other bodies more or less on the same prezzo.Quello end missing is definitely multi-click in the photo dynamic and not only feel very importante.Per the rest apart the absence of the grid that I think is not a big problem the machine performs in full its funzioni.A difference from what they read on other reviews it seems that not even 400 iSO up then increases much the limit rumore.Il of entrl'accessorio piuy level are often the basic optics provided to corrredo, for the rest worth what it was worth to film photography, the most important accessory in the photo kits always remains the photographer's eye. |
 | sent on September 23, 2016 Pros: Price, ease of use Cons: white balance, exposure, af Opinion: I held two years early, and seems perfect then over time you begin to see the flaws that obviously there are in each product. The automatic white balance is inefficient, especially in sunny days tend to create a dominant blue, too cool the scene, I use it manually. As for the exposure system we touch another sore point, unfortunately many photos are overexposed and exposure latitude has very low levels so it's all regulated pp. The af is not very sensitive and often must move the focus point in the scene for adjustment. It would take more physical commands. |
user94858 | sent on June 16, 2016 Pros: Small and lightweight (for an SLR), 24mpx, manual focus (via green dot inside the viewfinder), sealing of the ISO up to 1000, dedicated button to change the ISO, RAW. Cons: little competitive price, it costs as all entry level and does not offer anything more, the meter does not work with analog optics. Opinion: I used this machine on several occasions, first during the holidays where I studied most of its features and menus, and recently (forced by circumstances) for a job in a show of danza.rnrnSeppure it is a very economic machine if used their uniform and can give good results; the soundness of the ISO, up to 1000, is piuttoso good and focus point and manual focus through the viewfinder lets you also use the optical analogiche.rnDiventa complicated to use if there is a need to seize the moment, adjustments are good but not particularly practical and veloci.rnrnIl video industry is basic but complete, the complex offers fairly good results but like any SLR requires a shoulder or a steadicam to resume in a fluida.rnrnPer conclude a good entry level, can fit for those who are beginning and want to enter the world of photography, but does not offer anything more than the other brands do not have it already. |
 | sent on June 16, 2016 Pros: quality / price ratio, 24 megapixels, small, light and handy. Cons: A little 'at high ISO noise. Opinion: Using the Nikon D3200 for almost a anno.rnMi seems very suitable for learning (Guide Mode provides valuable assistance) and those who want to have the features of an SLR, low weight and minimum dell'ingombro.rnInoltre choosing compatible lenses is vastissima.rnHa all funzioni.rnL'estensione of ISO allowed me to shoot handheld in any lighting condition, even to the standard colors buio.rnNell'impostazione can sometimes be a little 'off, but just set the most saturated colors on the picture control menu for images also lively (you can also saturate the colors in post-production) .rnTutte menu settings are easily accessible, are changed in a secondo.rnI essential controls are simple and immediate : has a few well-placed buttons and funzionali.rnLa focus despite just 11 points is accurate and efficient. At high ISO is a bit 'of digital noise but it seems tollerabile.rnSono very satisfied by this reflex. And 'lightand very manageable. Has good ergonomics, even for those with hands over 24 megapixels piccole.rnIn, together with the quality of existing lenses, offer the ability to print in large format with excellent definition. I think the Nikon D3200 carries a great job and I think for the price you can not ask for more. |
 | sent on April 26, 2016 Pros: Value for money Cons: few controls almost all of the menu, so not very functional. Noise beyond 400 ISO Opinion: It 'was my first SLR, as entry level I must say he does his job perfectly. It gave me the opportunity to learn how to handle and learn about the world of SLR. With the right goals you are able to make great pictures. Certainly has some major deficiencies such as the grid in the viewfinder, the few commands except from the menu and a few focus points. In any case, to be an entry level is a tool that does its job perfectly. |
 | sent on March 10, 2016 Pros: Value for money Cons: Problems with the white balance in some situation, overcome by using it in M Opinion: Before this model I used for some time the D3100 my girlfriend, then I bought the D3200 and I have to say that I found myself well, when you get to know ... you understand the limitations and problems of the machine. You can not expect him to behave like a semi-professional, even if he gave me a lot of satisfaction, even under demanding conditions. If you want more you have to necessarily go to the higher-end models. In my humble opinion very good for those who want to get started without spending large sums |
user87463 | sent on January 27, 2016 Pros: Features simple but well-organized, sensor 24mpx, current price Cons: Substantial noise above ISO 400 Opinion: I used the D3200 continuously for two years, before moving to the current D7200. I must say that it is a machine capable of amazing shots, when combined with lenses of good quality. I would say that the flaws reside in 3D tracking (but with only 11 points is certainly not a surprise), the yield at high ISO (not a dragon in post-production and already 800 ISO noise is large) and the lack of the second ring. But to start, and how value is fully satisfied of the fact at the time. |
 | sent on January 25, 2016 Pros: 24 megapixel sensor, sensor comparable to a medium-high a few years back-end machine, ease of use Cons: skinny commands, keeping more than 400 ISO, MAF Points Opinion: It 'was my first SLR and allowed me to approcciarmi already with a very high quality sensor that allows you to churn out quality files especially if coupled with quality goals. The noise is not excessive up to 800 ISO but it is recoverable, and for a entry level SLR with a sensor so handsome is not bad (about the EXPEED 3) processor. When "we grow" he feels the lack of physical controls (eg double wheel) and a MAF more sofisticata.Comunque is to keep as a second camera body. |
 | sent on January 09, 2016 Pros: Weight, compactness, simplicity and quality / price ratio. Cons: Absence of bracketing function; above ISO 400 noise appears obvious; absence of the grid in the viewfinder. Opinion: Entry level SLR that does its job: it does the job for you is not imparare.rnSe novice "is a bit 'tight' .rnDalla his side definitely has the advantage of being lightweight, compact and easy to lack usare.rnLa a second ring nut for the adjustment is not a problem; he happily does without once one has been useful impratichiti.rnAvrebbero the grid in the viewfinder and perhaps the inclusion of a reflex function bracketing.rnIn conclusion without too many complications, easy to handle, pleasant to usare.rnrnrn |
 | sent on January 03, 2016 Pros: Sensor size and weight, handling, functions Cons: Suffers above 400 ISO, controls almost all from the menu. Opinion: Used for two years with satisfaction. For me as "the new trade" and rest an amateur is a good gym. The menus scenes and help guide the way a lot and explain many basic photography. Used in kits with 18/55 and 55/300 I did a bit of practice to the satisfaction of all. However, beginning to explore ways ASM, you realize that missing the keys of important functions that you just browsing the menu. He suffers medium and high ISO. The wider the heavy is too small and the unbalanced weight. Took tokina 11/16 I realized that needed a breakthrough and switched to 7200. However excellent entry level (with the limitations of the case) very useful to learn the basics with good satisfaction. |
 | sent on May 29, 2015 Pros: Definitely a great value for money. Cons: For use only with ISO 100/200. Opinion: Camera. Excellent value for money also calculating that currently costs about 400 euro and 250 euro new used. Megapixel wasted. They can make good pictures with the initial lens of the kit. Unfortunately we feel the limitation to the lack of advanced controls gradually it grows photographically. |
user40179 | sent on December 05, 2014 Pros: Sensor comparable to the DX high end, although not optimized in the same way. Very light and easy to handle. Quality file that exceeds many bodies of pro only 3-4 years before. Cons: Commands deliberately limited by Nikon respect to the potential of the machine. Noise above ISO 800. Opinion: Excellent machine to start photographing, already made good with targets KIT, becomes excellent if coupled to optical quality. Also good as a second camera body for an amateur: costs less than a TC1.4 (!) And weighs very little cluttered, and has a phenomenal performance with high-end lenses. Proven with SIGMA ART 35, once mounted is suffering detach from the body. For starters, after a bit 'of time you may feel the need for a more sophisticated system MAF, a high ISO performance more in line with the current high-end sensors, some commands in the most, especially the second ring. At a market price of about 300 Euros but it would be ungenerous to be critical. Highly recommended! |
 | sent on February 19, 2014 Pros: Quality / price ratio, 24 Mp sensor, small and lightweight, excellent workmanship of construction (to be an entry-level), it returns an excellent raw files, good park lenses and even if coupled with slow fx (I use a sigma 70-200 f2, 8) gives great satisfaction. confronted with her older sister (D7100) does not suffer much, in my opinion good resistance to Iso. Cons: 24 Mp (perhaps his merit is that a fault), 11-point AF, continuous AF in I do not always hooked the right target, as has already written one feels the lack of a grid in the viewfinder, slightly saturated colors ( but it is a problem easily solved underexpose slightly) Opinion: My first DSLR and I have to say that in a year gave me great satisfaction, and gave me a big appetite in this passion. He knows it is estimated that now buy for 300 € is an excellent first purchase, but I happily took the work of a second camera body. Confronted with the D7100 my father appeared to me to note that in keeping iso are the same. He feels the lack of a few things: a second wheel to adjust the aperture would be more comfortable, the grid in the viewfinder, the number of AF points, but they are all options that can be found on more expensive models. used with 35mm f 1.8 is a treat looks like a toy gun and using it at the time, even with the kit lens 18-105 is not bad, in fact it is a great all-round (clear all compared to the price). rnSecondo me 24 Mp for this processor are a bit too much, perhaps 16MP would be much more manageable and easy. |
 | sent on January 23, 2014 Pros: Sharpness even with the kit lens, portability, sensor, viewfinder, controls, metering, 24 mp Cons: Noise in the shadows evident from ISO 200 and very noisy, Body constructed economically and approximate value for money, reliability, af Lv, color rendering, Scripture memory cards with even slow the fast ones, buffer, set by compact Opinion: Definitely the best entry level SLR, here belongs to this category: plastic body built in a approssimativa.rnSensore with great clarity, although in some cases is slightly below par (fixable with a filter accentuates passage) and to exploit optics Professional, unique sound very obvious flaw in the shadows by the iso 200 and 3200 in the whole image, fantastic exposure, dull colors (PS in action). Cause high resolution shake-frequent if not used with shutter speeds or with optical VR. Major flaw of this machine is the management of most present noise at high (not only, from 400 in the whole picture, from 200 in the shadows): produces a "grain" irregular and large purple-green color noise with hot red pixels, a disorder difficult to resolve in PP. Here you get to the weak point: the building ... only after 25000 shots with frequent changes of the optical bayonet has become hard not to dialogue with the objectives (af included) ... maybe too rough for the construction ... (compared to d3000 who replaced) Com ...prate a mirrorless (Nikon does not, because with that sensor ridiculous, but maybe Sony or Fujifilm). Buy it if you use it at 100 iso and careful exposure. Rated 6.5 rnVoto final 6.5 |
 | sent on November 20, 2013 Pros: Lightweight, Handy, Compact, wide choice of targets DX, 24MP, Sensor EXPEED 3. Cons: A few points of Af (only 11), Built-in microphone NO STEREO, Phase Maf in a bit slow in the dark. Opinion: We talk about the entry-level model of Nikon, designed for those who come from digital, and for those who are starting to expect something più.rnIn in fact it is quite intuitive with the SCENE MODE GUIDE and various selectable which help the user in the approach phase . However, it is essential to begin to understand how we must move in the field of photography and it is definitely a viable "mercy" for newbies, being able to set aperture and shutter speed, ISO and whatever is in it in Auto or Manual Semi-Aut ( P, S, A) although I recommend to dabble in Manual already from the beginning. Of course I would have liked some point AF in most but for the type of machine we have in hand are also quite. With the new firmware update available on the site in 2013 Nital.it improves the battery life that is already good for sè.rnNella composition of the video I noticed a bit of slowness in focusing particularly under conditions of darkness doing a lot of work the stabilizer and therefore also some little noise in the same maf.rnIn any case the possibility & agrave, to enjoy the 24 Mp processed by the sensor EXPEED 3 make it very well. Touch-a good impression despite the weight leggero.rnInsomma a good springboard to jump headlong into the world of photography Reflexrn |
 | sent on September 26, 2013 Pros: Excellent value '/ price, entry level has to be a' good ability 'productive, decent manageability, good battery life, more than 500 shots with flash and auto focus, easy to use guide with the option (for those who did not' familiarity with SLRs), Good quality 'of the display, it seems to me more than 900k, allows you to see with a good quality' preview a shot just realized, good realizzazzione aesthetics of the body made with a texture from professional. Cons: Missing the grid on the viewfinder, there should be entrusted to the points of Af for the location of the scene, it lacks the fire engine on the machine, over 3200 iso starts to be slightly noise, the colors are too'' off'' you must act in post production to saturate slightly, Opinion: Being my first SLR unprofessional opinion is definitely a medium / good, the body being made of plastic material turns out to be light, which reverberates with lens mounted on the balance ... I was slightly disappointed with the color rendering, can not find them very much alive, and I happen to be having to saturate in post-production in order to return to a level acettabile, average speed 'continuous shooting, declared for 4 fps, personally I've never gone more than 3 fps .. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
