|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on December 18, 2019 Pros: Quality on all focal points from 24 to 70 mm. Cons: Too much (weight, price, size), Impigrisce. Opinion: A lens that is quite indispensable if you have to do some work, i would go back but I would orient myself on a tamron and use the money saved for some excellent fixed, the quality of the images is great, but at what cons? as mentioned the price, then the size and weight, decidedly exaggerated. In addition, changing with focals so impigrisa a lot and you tend to photograph still stops by rotating the dial of the zoom, for some it may seem like a crap but the limits increase creativity. |
 | sent on May 07, 2019 Pros: All Cons: Don't have it. Opinion: What about the displeasure of the optics I come from the smooth 24-70 not vr ,sharpness on the whole frame at 2'8 I seem to have a fixed optics,bokeh fantastic from fairy tale . Despite many negative reviews on doxomark and photography sites I found this lens stratospheric, and in addition taken (thanks to Mr Fanetti of Fotomoderna ) a great used equal to the new. The only thing I noticed is that from 50mm to 70mm if I shoot from less than 60 to 70cm to 2.8 the image turns out to me a little soft in the middle, but closing a stop is perfect. To those who find reviews about the nikon as happened to me ,in which you make comparisons with sigma art or tamron you are not to hear anyone try the nikon if you can I on d850 I think I have never found such a perfect optics, in all. Extra advice, pocket permitting, the 24th 70 vr nikon . I don't talk about weight because I come from the old man and I knew it but I noticed that even if it weighs 170 grams more it is very well balanced. I forgot he also has the vr that sometimes makes a difference, and it goes that it's a fairy tale. I think the nikon has made a really good lens I dare not think of the new 24-70 2.8 s for nikon z. They say that the nikon s per ml is better according to those who tried them both. I do not think that nikon does not allow to use the optics with adapter on ml z, there will be a difference but not exaggerated as they describe, also because they cost equal. What I understand is that all the old optics say old, they go better on nikon z.Maybe it's physiological no mirror, stabilizer in the car ,etc etc... I remain of the opinion that if I were to switch to the system ml z the optics that I now have the earths , because the glass is good and always good. |
 | sent on January 23, 2019 Pros: Sharpness to TA, sniper AF, file cleanup, brightness Cons: Vignettaaaaaaaaaaaa Opinion: I bought this fabulous optics in December for my D850, I came from the coupled D810 and Tammy 24 70g2... well here we are on another planet, not only for the change of machine; Of the Tammy G2 I can say well, great quality and ratio for the price but the Nikon is really superb. I use it for even two months but I'm excited, I've never disconnected, not even to use the fixed as I did before with the Tamron. The Vr is fantastic, shots with the times you want and the image will always be perfect, without any defect already at 2.8. In the faults I have not inserted weight and footprint because you see it, you know, imagine it and decide if it can go well or not, the big problem, the only but rather obvious is the vignetting marked but easily correctable in pp. For the rest fantastic lens! |
 | sent on September 07, 2018 Pros: Construction, speed and accuracy AF, versatility as focal, VR that was missing. Cons: Weight, weight, weight, dimensions, filter diameter, price of the new. Opinion: I've landed for a year at this mammoth goal. Mastodontic as 24-70, relative to my practical use, as I consider the standard optics handyman, priceless, that you take away and do almost everything, helping you with the crop of D850. It is true that it replaces several fixed optics, which also were those read from F/1.8 more would weigh as total sum, in the backpack. But when you graft it on a body that is already heavy, maybe with the grip, it seems to go around with a stone in the neck, or on the shoulder. It is longer, wider and heavier than the previous. The filter diameter is no longer 77 as the 16-35, the previous 24-70, the 70-200, the various 300/4, 85/1.4 etc. becomes 82, like the Magnificent 105/1.4 (here's a childish excuse to buy that as well, which I did). The hood remains attached to the outside of the barrel, while the lenses advance and retract: at 24 mm the lens hood protrudes the minimum, only a few cm... Beyond the complaints, I consider the optical handyman definitive, because it has features from "Pro" obvious: first of all a lightning fast that makes pale many fixed. Then obviously the solid construction, the helicoid of the zoom without uncertainties, the lens hood hooked around that will break down in case of impact saving the optics (it happened to me, 50 euro new), even if it is a bit ' cumbersome. As an optical rendering it seems homogeneous. I got it used because the previous 24-70 after 10 years was giving signs of mechanical failure, otherwise at full price I would not buy it certainly, since the old is at 900 (being very careful of the zoom ring that does not imdot). To consider in this new version the advantage of the VR, especially with many megapixels, when the risk of the blur is great, both in the photograph taken on the fly on some moving medium, in situations of low light or deliberately slow times. It is not a review by technician, which are not, simply my practical impression in the use. I forgot: good bokeh conforming to the background, not comparable to fixed by portrait I had and not even at 70-200 at 70mm. But you can't ask him. Anyway, it's got a circular diaphragm. Ah already, a lot of sticker at 2.8 but it corrects with a click, if not like. |
 | sent on August 27, 2018 Pros: Everything you can Cons: Nothing Opinion: I can only be in agreement with Mr. Tomei. The price does not make history for a very high quality optics and also the weight. I owned the previous 24-70 and I sold it just because I couldn't see the splendity of the Nikkor AI-s optics. This has a very high optical rendering with absent distortion and allows you to get beautiful photos at night and in closed places. I dare not think, I still use a D700, surrender on a D850 must be "devastating." Returning to the speech of the previous peso....il weighed 900 gr. This 1070 Gr. .... difference 170 Gr. ... ridiculous... |
 | sent on August 11, 2018 Pros: All! The best 24-70 for Nikon. Cons: Price, weight and footprint. Opinion: After over a month of use on D810 and a trip to Ireland to test it thoroughly, I can state without a doubt that Nikon has created an excellent 24-70 in every respect. Who says that the old is better probably has vista problems... About the resolution is pretty much perfect. At F8 the edges are perfectly solved already at 24mm. In some respects you have the impression of shooting with a fixed lens. Excellent blur, instantaneous autofocus, Vr, which, if you have a steady hand, allows shots at 1/8 seconds at 70mm. Excellent colour rendition, saturated and neutral colours. I don't feel like talking about negative aspects... The optic weighs and is great but the speech falls if you compare it with the old too heavy and cumbersome. So those who want this type of lens is a priori that must accept its construction which by the way is excellent. Ultimately I'm thrilled and I can not help but recommend! |
 | sent on May 23, 2018 Pros: Quality in all directions Cons: Price, a bit of distortion at 24mm Opinion: Exceptional optics, although it cost me a kidney and liver together. Af-precise and very fast, VR exceptional, yield on D500 extremely good, scary sharpness for the category! On FF from the best of though, it almost seems to have a step up again and as a result you appreciate it much more. Extremely recommended, the optics that should never be missed! |
 | sent on February 20, 2018 Pros: AUTOFOCUS AND VR FAST AND PRECISE. EXCELLENT SHARPNESS OVER THE FIELD. GREAT GENERAL OPTICAL QUALITY. EXCELLENT MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION. Cons: OVERALL DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT, HIGH PRICE Opinion: If I can think of just one word to describe this lens: a tank: great as quality and optical performance and big as a measurement! rnSimply a rock as a construction: even if it is of considerable size, equal to a telephoto zoom, both the focus and the focal ring remain manageable. The weight is remarkable, we are on the kilo, but if combined with an FX body like in my case a D700, the whole is balanced. On a 12MPixel sensor like the D700 one can not fully exploit its definition. If I have to find a defect, the only one worth mentioning is the price! I bought it using a promotion that made it accessible (so to speak) but with that price today you can easily buy three fixed lenses of mid-range ... |
 | sent on November 11, 2017 Pros: Vr Cons: Price, plastic everywhere, optical performance Opinion: For years those like me who used the 24-70 with satisfaction wanted an upgrade with VR, and now they have it. It is a pity, however, that the stabilizer has "gifted" 5 more lenses in the optical scheme (from 15 to 20), and this is reflected in the performance: this optics is yes more uniform up to the edges, but at the level of sharpness never reaches the smooth 24-70. Worse also the barrel, the magnesium alloy for the vile plastic has been abandoned. VR on the other hand is very good, but it alone certainly doesn't work wonders... |
 | sent on February 07, 2017 Pros: Construction, color rendering and sharpness, making lightning fire. Cons: A slight distortion at 24, but then less and less pronounced for other alternatives. Opinion: After much hesitation I decide to take this view and I was immediately enthusiastic. I had the old 24-70 that I decided to sell its time to take a hard, this has greater sharpness at the edges and af improved and lightning-fast and accurate. At the center of the difference it is minimal and vr works very well. On nikon d810 exceptional and building on top. Honestly the weight is not the problem, after all if you want a building at the top is the price to pagare.Lo highly recommend especially for those who have the latest generation of reflex |
 | sent on November 21, 2016 Pros: color quality, sharpness, construction, focus. Cons: Strong distortion at 24mm Opinion: Tried to Nikon Day held at my local retail store, it has crushed the comparison with my 24-120 f / 4. color fidelity, sharpness, contrast, bokeh, focus lightning, took a few photos to notice a huge difference between the two lenses. I also tried the 28-300, nothing to do neither with one nor the other. Yes, it is heavy, yes, it's plasticky, but 20 elements in 16 groups have weighed by force, and the plastic quality is really superior. The VR seems to work well, better than the 24-120 at the same focal and times. I bought it without delay despite the higher focal length is shorter: the crop needed to switch the angle of 34 ° to 20 ° field is important, but the quality in the end will be quite similar to the diaphragms equal. The distortion is not a problem, just a click lightroom, and the rest of distortion at 24mm 24-120 is monstrous. anch and vignetting is more contained and pleasant. The price? The more you spend, the better you eat ... |
| sent on August 15, 2016 Pros: optical quality construction, good results over the D810 Cons: Weight, price Opinion: B? Rn |
 | sent on June 19, 2016 Pros: quality optical mouse, construction material. Cons: the weight feels a bit, the price. Opinion: On D750 is fine, tried now on Nikon D810 a real bomb, an average stabilized zoom and 'what it took, the difference from the other 24-70 and' minimum color rendering and 'very good in my opinion, highly recommend .lo because everywhere you go you'll take home a shot with .rnProvato LEE color rendering filters to topp, are satisfied, this is' my opinion .rnConsigliato strongly compliments Nikon |
  | sent on December 26, 2015 Pros: Optical quality, behavior with digital high definition. Cons: Price, weight and diameter filters. Opinion: Finally it arrived and after intense use of fixed on D800 and D810 now a nice stabilized zoom. I would say that is fine of D810 highlighting the qualities. Only faults the price, but is a little more than € 2000 import with 2 years warranty, which are still so many but certainly less than reported on other "lists" and overweight. For the rest it behaves very well and lets you take up to 1/20 without problems for magnification 200x or more. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
