JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user164243
sent on October 20, 2023
Pros:Quality, quality, sharpness and tonal smoothness
Cons:I can't find any
Opinion:I had the opportunity to buy back this lens (with the PK-13) that I had owned in the 80s and honestly in analog it had not made me tear my hair out at the time; Good optics but not as sharp and crisp as the noble 105 micro. Today I took it again mainly because I'm exhuming the analog kit but I also wanted to test it with DSLRs and... A whole new world opened up to me. I'm doing still life test mainly but honestly I didn't remember it so good... Neutral and pastel colors, full but not closed blacks, sharpness that you feel like you can touch the object with your hands. There are 2 cases: either I have "matured" over the years, or I had a model that was not exactly perfect in the 80s but today this lens that has been firmly fixed for a month on the various SLRs, I will not give it away for any reason.
Pros:Resolvency, constructive quality, out of focus
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:Sought and found at 120 palanche, it is worth at least twice as much. AF that is not lacking, the focus is precise and pleasant to use ... in 1h after the purchase I had already done the hand. Inhuman resolution, even the sensor of the d300s captures details that with other objectives we dream ... I would like to try the 200 f4 micro to compare them, but I think we are there ... I dare not think what you can do with the dynamic range of the sensor of a d810 or a d850.
Pros:Sharpness, the price of used, solid construction, made fluid fire ....
Cons:I often have to overexpose .... maybe not 2.8
Opinion:Got on the internet to a ridiculous figure just to try to take pictures .... macro amazement I discovered that the images and color rendering are outstanding .... definitely a view to take with if '.... the slowness of the manual focus, the calculation of light and shadow and the meticulous research of the composition, make it a lens to meditation .... the real treat was also in use as optical picture from .... certainly maximum sharpness is certainly not an asset for this type of photography .... but in difficult light conditions the greatest contrast and acutance help you get good pictures ... the fact that the right format becomes almost a 80 mm closes circle.....
Opinion:Bought used at a figure given after verfica online features, I must say that has maintained and exceeded expectations. The construction is indestructible, although this weight is maintained at levels more than acceptable. Of course its use is static. The resolution is the highest in the park my optics, so much so that I use it mostly ends up on a tripod to exalt it to the fullest. Who could ask for more? Practically these years I photographed for free, the rivendessi now recupererei my investment with interest.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
