JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Lens suitable for different types of photography, opinion perhaps very obvious but I think it is the greatest strength for a 35 mm
Cons:the lampshed doesn't drive me crazy
Opinion:I had been planning to get a 35 mm for some time and, as an amateur, I have the impression that this lens is of a very bright nature; only sins the lampshed. I had the opportunity to test it during an excursion on the Asiago Plateau last summer, some shots I made instead in an urban context which I think is the ideal scenario for a 35 mm lens; For the time being, I am very satisfied.
Opinion:Assiema at 105 1.4 is my favorite lens lens. Sharp already at full aperture if calibrated as it should in the car, fuzzy Creamy, the detachment from the tops is soft, makes it blurry almost magical.. I mean, I love it! I had recently also the chance to try the Sigma 35 art, lens really very sharp, but as mentioned by others, it ends there, there is no comparison.
Pros:All you need to have an optics: blurred color rendering and sharpness at the top. Aesthetic.
Cons:The lens hood is a little crude and pure plastic with no inner lining. Maybe a little weight.
Opinion:Sigma or Nikon? That is the question that everyone is asking. I have always used the Sigma art for their sharpness and very low price. Nice lenses But the whole thing ended there. They gave no other, zero character. I always admired the sharpness however I always had the impression that something was missing. Then I wanted to take off the whim and try the Nikon 35 1.4. There is little to turn around. This lens on the sigma if it eats it all over. Maybe it does not have the surgical yield of the Sigma to TA but however there is no comparison. Terrific color rendition. It manages to capture shades of color that the Sigmas fail. Blurry wonderful, creamy and with a deadlift of plans that even here Sigma fails. In short, the expense is important, costs more than double the Sigma but the one that can give you is the best that Nikon can offer. Obviously I do not express myself comparing it to optics like the Otus as they go far beyond my possibilities. Among the pros I put the aesthetics. To me the Nikon professional optics aesthetically like a lot, much more than the Canon optics.
Opinion:I had the 35 1.4 Nikon then sold and I got the Sigma, and now I got the Nikon. The quality of this lens for me doesn't even come close to the Sigma and don't speak of sharpness I talk about nuances, color rendition. I have other lenses Sigma Art but then again, to me it's just like the Nikon 35 24. If you take Import you save quite a bit. Autofocus a bit slow, but still allows you to focus actions without problems.
Opinion:Purchased recently, though having a Zeiss Milvus 35 f / 2 in the home, basically for having less weight and more action in the reportage photography. The surprising display for the great sharpness already f / 2. The blur is soft, shadows not overly closed, the chromatic rendering is loyal. Well constructed and tropicalized (maybe the hood is a bit to be inserted and be careful not to damage it during positioning maneuvers). At f / 2 i am sorry, af / 2.8 me conforta, af / 4 mi esalta.rnThank you very much (especially in coupled with the D810) rn
Pros:Everything you would expect from a professional lens
Cons:The price
Opinion:A fantastic lens from every angle and extremely versatile, it fits your way of photographing and adapts to the unbelievable. Sublime chromi, quite sharp already in TA becomes a blade af 2, amazing tridimensionality, bokeh very enjoyable with that minimal nervous that reflects its personality. Excellent construction, inside is all metal and the covering polymer is of high quality. I read that somebody complains of the weight, in fact he is very good and is well balanced. I took it after comparing it with the old AIs 35mm f 1.4 and with the corresponding Sigma Art and Zeiss which, although very good, suffer in one way or another of the overcoat complex too. And above all they do not have the magic, because it's the one that makes the difference between our Nikon and the others. The price I have to say is very high for a first, but I assure you will not regret a euro of money spent! For the vote I have no doubts, 10 cum laude ... rnATTENZIONE: Who writes is not an influencer a guru, and not even one who downloads other images from the network to impersonate unlikely comparisons. For almost forty years, a passionate nikonist of photography and photographic material has been, and my opinion is not a gospel, but only the result of empirical experience. The objects I write really buy them, I play a few months and if I do not like them, but always and in any case of material at the moment in my possession. I do not make the copy paste of reviews taken here and there on the net, if I'm talking about an item it's just and because I had in the house the time it took (at least months) to try to figure it out. I often go against current, but this does not take my sleep, as far as possible I try to help young aspiring photographers who give a weight to their savings. But, I repeat, I do not bring the verb ...
Pros:Colours, three-dimensionality and character. Construction.
Cons:CA at 1.4. High price.
Opinion:I have this lens since it came out. Used intensely as it is my favorite focal. colors, color transitions, blurry, and character at high levels. I also tried the much preferred by many 35 Sigma 1.4.... but I preferred the Nikon. AF not lightning fast but very accurate. It's, for me, one of those optics that I don't know that stimulates the creative process every time I look through it. Some aberration at TA but for me it was never a problem. I consider it to be equal class at the 35 F2 of Zeiss, another gorgeous lens.. But that's another story.
Cons:definitely the weight and a fairly high cost.
Opinion:I got to try (borrow) though I do not love the fixed lenses must say I rimastornsoddisfatto for its sharpness and brightness at certain shots is essential to have, the quality of this light is indisputable sicuramente.rnSe you are not prepared to the optical weight in a full day could become a problem.
Opinion:I've had it for some time but I wanted to take it off for two reason .. the 35mm focal length is ideal for my street and reportage. Turning the street with D610 and 35mm 1.4 certainly not go unnoticed .. not only by the people who wanted to photograph but also by third parties .. I never felt safe to turn the street and taking pictures to people with a perspective so expensive and showy I was not comfortable even more because someone asked me about. and then the weight too .. !! if you walk for a morning or even for a day with this lens attached to the body at the end the feel and many more.
Pros:Blurred, Three-dimensionality, Sharpness to TA, Colors, Vignette Artistic, Repeatability AF, Ergonomics, Yield Backlit
Cons:Price, aberrations in TA, weight, construction
Opinion:Along with the 58 F / 1.4G lens my favorite home Nikon photo magnificent and magical returns that are comparable only to the 58 1.4 although not so dreamy. Compared with 35 ART costs more than double, it is true, but brings with it a crazy character and color that the Sigma dreams. In contrast, the ART is clearer to TA, but the differences are canceled by F / 2. Spectacular landscapes and portraits ambientati, prepunched is really amazing. In short, a rare gem that I hardly detach.
Opinion:This objective was given to me by my wife and at first I was a bit skeptical because the photography magazines you did nothing but talk about the fine art sigma 35 mm 35 mm considered the best on the market. After doing a lot of shots with 35mm nikon I must say I completely satisfied with its performance. lens class
Opinion:I think I'm the first to review this jewel by Nikon, and frankly I am surprised a lot '. Indecision lasted months, was especially hard research, because I had to wait for the blow of c .. heh heh. In fact I got used to 1100 euro, but it is a big word used is brand new, the old owner kept him very little. Uninterrupted coupled with the d700. The three-dimensional image and the quality of the out of focus areas are fully in line with the premises. The lens is big and heavy ... flashy. You run the risk, if you want to "enter" in the scene, taking shots of hood subjects to photograph. At the center is already in TA levels completely unthinkable only a few years ago. Nothing ... nothing smudge marks. Just close some shots of the aperture (f / 2-2.8) that the sharpness will be able to wrap around the frame. Night is moving can afford things that other objectives you the dreams only. I gave away the 24-70 to experiment with the qualita 'of this fixed wonderful .. do not regret it at all, is another type of photography, made of legs .. like say a famous reporter. If you really want to make an expenditure, would definitely recommend it, especially to those who want to make a leap in quality '.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
