| sent on January 02, 2016
Pros: Construction, weight, size, crisp, glassy rendering, color and passionate forms.
Cons: Sometimes it is hard to focus when focus (especially when the light is not 'friend').
Opinion: Objective assoluto.rnE 'very, very similar to the 28mm f3.5, which is in a bit less contrast, so I use it instead of APSC (D300) to its full potential, while this one has a better fuzzy and well digradato , focus to 20cm away from the subject, and has a more vivid clarity and marcata.rnForme and colors are tasty / and full-bodied, like the pictures of the great glamor magazines, full of depth and sensazione.rnE 'fairly neutral, which whether inanimate objects or human forms, capturing the significant details of everything without attacking, keeping a second participant and plan well digradato.rnLa made the edges is equal to or slightly lower than the 3.5, but not much. The strength of this lens is that it has a rather uniform behavior at all diaphragms without boring the quality or sharpness falls. I plan to buy a 28mm f2 ais, but put me thinking of its vulnerability to the reflections and reverberations of light, inconvenience I suffer frequently on meor 85mm f2 ais TA.rnAd in every way, is a prestigious lens and worth the money it costs (used I paid 300euri, original in excellent condition), also because there are no other 28mm of the same optical quality nor higher, home Nikon, (not even 28 f1.4AFD, which is greatly brighter, but qualitatively not higher. but Costa six / seven times!). rnInsieme to 105 to 180 f2.8 and f2.5 ais ais ED is a lens to hold on to for vita.rnFocheggia at close range, giving photographs a fantastic prospective momentum, while maintaining a certain geometric balance and contained distortions (24mm, for example, is too extreme for me as it has the most close fires therefore tends to bend the lines. The 28, instead, is very similar to 35, but most 'athletic' and dynamic) |