JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Bought as a fixed lens handyman. It performs its role very well, light and precise and with a car autofocus fast enough while noisy. Perfect on aps-c as a street target, in my opinion it has only little solvency but I used it on nikon d7100 so I would recommend it for a fullframe or for sensors with a few megapixels. Only for semi-pro bodies as it has no lens autofocus.
Pros:Compact and lightweight. Good sharpness in the center. Chromatic aberrations, distortion and vignetting contained
Cons:To be a fixed is not bright. No sharpness at the edges of the full frame, even af ??/ 8. In fact it can be well covered by a semi-pro zoom with comparable performance
Opinion:I'm rather upset. Initially I had bought it for making photos on the premises with the D7000. On APS-C, he works extensively on his work. When I went to the full frame, I thought I would keep it as a sharp optic for landscape photos. I compared it to the 24-120 VR f / 4, a mid-high band zoom. Distortion with the 24mm is contained, and is automatically corrected by Nikon software and the camera. Conversely, with 24-120, distortion is more pronounced, and is not completely corrected. The 24m purple fringing aberrations are non-existent, which can not be said of the zoom. Sharpness at the edges however is almost embarrassing af / 4. And it does not improve any more by stopping af / 5.6 of / 8. Ultimately, for landscape shots the 24-120 produces better images in post-production. Adding the fact that 24mm is a focal covered by many zoom, with a loss of brightness of up to one stop, I do not see many reasons to use it, apart from having a light wider wide angle. On APS-C is oneValid option, but I would recommend the 35mm f / 1.8 DX. Vote 7 on FF, 9 on APS-C
Opinion:Bought used, but in excellent condition, I wanted a good wide-angle lens with a fixed aperture ... I found it very good, very crisp, very comfortable for what concerns night views, and photos to the Milky Way, is a beautiful lens, turning a little crisp, robust, despite the ridiculous size, weighs parecchio.rnNel used market if they are several, and spending relatively little you can make a deal, being a glass that has nothing to envy to more moderne.rnUnica flaw slow, so if you can say, it is that it can be used, of course, only semi-pro bodies, since it has no AF interno.rnEstremamente recommended
Pros:Beautifully crafted, metal and window of the depth of field. Brightness fixed.
Cons:poor sharpness with Nikon D3300
Opinion:I made a comparison between 24mm F2.8D (perfect) with 18-55 VRII, after a few minutes and the same subject, same focal ie 24mm, same focus and same esposizione.Risultato parameters: the zoommino 18-55 F.3.5 5.6 VRII sharpness and higher contrast, visible without enlarging the foto.rnSicuramente is a great goal, but I'll have to change it. I can not trust to keep and change camera.
user58495
sent on August 06, 2016
Pros:Sharpness, construction, color pastes
Cons:But nothing
Opinion:Bought new lens hood with original yesterday morning: for now I only did some tests, but I plan to test it thoroughly in the next few days, during vacanze.Per now: solid construction, robust and refined, yet lightweight and Df is ingombrante.Sulla beautiful ... rnColori pasty, very good sharpness at full aperture, excellent since 5,6.rnMessa rapid fire, virtually nothing distortion, blurry and pasty morbido.rnHo increased a little contrast in tests with the picture control to Neutral habitually use and greater definition of micro details and detaches better colori.rnPer the price is stratospheric perspective and does not seem to suffer at all flare.rnConsigliatissimo those who do not want to spend a huge amount for the much more expensive F 24 1, 8.
Pros:Sharpness in the center, price to be used, AF speed, weight and size.
Cons:forfeiture to the edges.
Opinion:I already have the Nikon 20 1.8 and on a whim I took the 24 outputs used to read and without obligation. I had put a lot of faith in 'perspective why having a D800E I noticed that little performance objectives are not entirely Sensor friends from 36mpx. L 'optical rather surprised me, very very sharp in the center with a decline at the edges not too strong for my taste. Already quite clear to f2.8 and f5.6 at its best. For a perspective you always behind the lightweight, space-saving advice
Opinion:purchased used model not D, made fantastic paid just under € 150 worth much più.Normalmente in ff with D700 use 20-35 2.8 I feel good, but with envi fixed when you have the time to frame it calmly another cosa.rnConsiglio all nikonisti looking for a 24 to make us a thought, even the new version AFD worth all the money that costa.Poi if you're lucky enough to find a used affixed, meglio.E 'light goes everywhere.
Pros:Sharp at all apertures, compact, risolvenza also on digital, well corrected, distortion correction exemplary also on full frame. Af fast.
Cons:Nothing.
Opinion:Excellent !! Always clear at all apertures from the center to the edges. A distortion correction really accurate. Very little vignetting on full frame. I never had problems of flare but you have to use the lens hood. Excellent for landscapes and reportage. Versatile also on APS-C. The cost of the new is modest for the services can give without spending a fortune for version af-s F1.4. With a colleague of mine who owns the Nikon AF-S 24mm F1.4 doing tests on the same camera believe me, where is the difference? We were surprised, A must have !!
Opinion:The use of D90, bought used, a fairy tale! RnNitidezza good already in TA, small, compact, fast, short, full of virtues, and for what it costs used, a shame not to have it if you use the DX is fissi.rnSu a bit of a heresy, but it becomes a nice 36mm, and ye shall have often attacked as hood use one of the 50 AF-D 1.8, the diameter of the filter is the same, and at least protects better reflections of the original metal, that on DX leaves much scoperto.rnrnUn field must be avere.rn
user52859
sent on September 23, 2014
Pros:af impressive speed, distortion almost nonexistent (I use it on d7000), color tones quite real
Cons:none of APSC, only little flare that often there is also
Opinion:I use it for almost two years on d7000 what about no aberration purple green (like the 35mm 1.8g) vignetting also absent A2,8 that and already great, but really very little little distortion, fixed with 1 to 3 stop f4 f5.6 f8 and superb flare you can find it in the evening a little or backlit but all optical suffer in these conditions is resolved with the lens hood does not include (i 4 euro on amazon) lightweight, compact and becomes an 36mm on APSC and practically not I take the car never really satisfied about d7000 I highly recommend it (as I do not recommend the 35mm 1.8g dx) vote in 1110 was forgetting the quality at the edges which remains unchanged I take only the center point and then reassemble and make any cuttings, perhaps af lightning because it uses the PTO of the machine but nothing to do with the 35 mm 1.8 g dx, only negative and that it has been misplaced under 200 pippi but considerarata the focal APSC and the quality of the optics in general worth them all
Pros:Compact, excellent performance at all apertures, perhaps best of DX on FX ... often underestimated
Cons:Hood sold separately
Opinion:Used a lot of D90 where perhaps I preferred covering an angle of 35mm x speak. Optics very good at all apertures, beautiful colors and pastellosi typical of AF. Autofocus quickly and precisely. Compact and lightweight, often overlooked as optical GA or "normal" DX ... shame as it has no rivals on its price range (used on 200-220 €).
user36759
sent on April 19, 2014
Pros:Compact and quality, especially on film, excellent resistance to flare, without chromatic aberration even at full aperture
Cons:Not recommended on APS-C
Opinion:Lens that makes more sense on the 24x36 than on APS-C, not so much for the field angle as for the lower yield on the reduced size. In backlight behaves really well, the opposite of the previous version D. Not natural, and not hyper contraed as modern lenses. However it is a lens to have if you have a 24x36 SLR, both digital and film. It would be nice that Nikon produced a DX version, as did Canon for its APS-C REFELX.
Cons:No hood (unforgivable on so short a focal length) rnpoca resistance to flare
Opinion:I got this lens in its previous version (AF D) that changes only for the treatment of the lenses and flash synchronization, but are almost identical, the image quality is exceptional, the use of D7000, being a lens OLD STYLE is slightly less contrasted the current versions of G, but it is not always a bad thing, in fact, just a slight correction of the picture control in the car behaves very well, used is cheap and since the respective modern version of AFS is inaccessible this is a worthy substitute for those like me who like the fixed and does not want to compromise on quality.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
