JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Dimensions and weight. impeccable construction. neutral and realistic photo rendering. uniform and consistent behavior at all focal lengths.
Cons:Loss of accuracy in low light conditions. slight vignetting at f4.
Opinion:Although autofocus lenses are more ready to use, have colder and mechanical behavior compared to manual focus, which are more organic, passionate, and this shines through scattate.rnSto photographs by gradually shifting from first to second, and I must say that the series to / ais is really prestigiosa.rnQuesto 200mm lens is a beautiful, crisp and full-bodied at all focal lengths, with the focus ring to smooth and precise focus, even though it clearly is not always easy to use, due to the fact that it is MF as already mentioned, and is not stabilizzato.rnForse, the small size (especially the diameter) penalize the due stability more slender handle. I write this because compared to 180 f2.8, for example, is more difficult to maintain firm (maybe it's just my imagination ...). RNE 'incisive but gentle, very clear, pastelloso, as if dipingesse.rnIl 180 f2. 8 and this 200, on nikon d700 are very similar behavior, evenThough clearly the 180 is brighter and better fuzzy (and the 200 is more stable and steady as behavior at all focal lengths), but this, perhaps, is more suitable for outputs scalmanate.rnA f4, it transmits more light than 135 f3. 5 closed at f4.
user61502
sent on August 05, 2015
Pros:Light, cheap, clear. Readily available on the market of 'used.
Cons:Cartoon slightly to f4.
Opinion:I own this lens for several years (Ai version) and making a price / performance ratio can assure you that the optical and 'amazing. From the best of af 5,6- 8 returning true color and contrast images. I use it with extension tubes and behaves with dignity. It is easily found in the market of 'used in small sums. We recommend the purchase for those who want a good lens handyman.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
