| sent on May 26, 2024
Pros: File quality, sensor, ergonomics, ease of use, lens, autofocus, use with flash
Cons: A "freeze" every now and then. A certain slowness in starting and starting from standby
Opinion: The qualities of the camera are known and punctually verified: construction, ergonomics, ease of use, lens, menu, app (not only for the Q3), autofocus, tilting screen (for me), very silent mechanical shutter. The first thing that struck me about the Q3, however, the one that made me say "wow", was the workability of the DNG files, or the sensor: spectacular. Recovery of shadows, highlights, noise quality, colors, microcontrast. A pleasure to open files in Camera Raw (which unfortunately does not have the correction of the Summilux 1.7, but with the Summilux M it is fine for distortion). I use it, mostly, at 36 mega and I feel very good. The other aspect I want to emphasize is the use with the flash: being a camera with a central mechanical shutter you can do interesting things at high shutter speeds without the need for hss. For my type of photography, the combination with the LightPix Labs M20, or Q20 II, is great. Also with the latest firmware 2.03 the autofocus (I come from years of Sony) has improved even if I have used it occasionally. Out of about 3,000 shots taken in five months three times I had the problem of the camera blocking which was solved by extracting and putting the battery back on after waiting about ten seconds, Certainly the 28 mm must be evaluated very well (in doubt I recommend a ride of a few months with a Ricoh GR III); You can also cut in post but the focal length is demanding about the composition but permissive working in hyperfocal. Putting its qualities together, the Q3 is a unique tool, provided that Sony, already having the sensor at home, does not decide to make an RX1R III. |