JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Leica M10 : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Cameras
Cameras Leica
Leica M10

Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this camera.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Leica M10)

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Mpaci

sent on November 03, 2017

Pros: Three-dimensionality of the lenses. Sensor with ISO seal better than a 1dx Mark II

Cons: I can not give negative feedback on the car

Opinion: I am a M10 owner of a Monochrom typ246 and a 1Dx Mark IIHo had a Nikon D810 and tried so many other machines. For Leica I can say unlike the common idea that sensors are bombs and that, for example, Canon is far superior to any point of view. The three-dimensionality due to the lenses is far superior to any system and coupled lens has ever had in Nikon and Canon's home and definitely the system from a pure image quality point of view offers a lot of but there is a lack of autofocus but this is one thing you know. Personally to this day I have not found any limit in my use of street and urban architecture.

Paolor

sent on November 03, 2017

Pros: A beautiful looking car, with a charisma of the past, but within its body lives the contemporary digital technology, emotion gives it as much as if it were the real sense of photography .. I must say the sensor, it generates much real detail, good dynamic range.

Cons: non-autofocus optics that in the first moments of using doubts about the correct MAF of the subject, is digital as well as the machines of other manufacturers, the cost is a matter of just prestige.

Opinion: For those who like me employ reflexes for work and quota buying a mirrorless in this case a Leica M10, we can say no more purchase but investment .., I think for a mirrorless car you can spend even less see Sony or Fuji with really features remarkable. Leica does not want to call it a camera between the MIRRORLESS, it is not simply because of its unique style of photography, reflexes or mirrorless cameras are more or less hyperactive. Leica is a style of observation.

100 Metri

sent on July 24, 2017

Pros: A good diet has been worth not only the feeling but the safety of a great grip, the dynamic range is good, the viewfinder is great and the shot less nervous

Cons: I don't like the ISO dial as it is; I would have done a pressure draw as well as the block... alternatively, round the body as on the right. The quality of the file does not convince me...

Opinion: Everything is related to my old but new Leica M-P 240. The Leica M10 has a good file but in most cases, even without opening too much shadows but also in the half tones has a strange effect; white dots scattered throughout the affected area and a few points that on the TYPE 240 not even the shadow at 3200 without correction, of the primary colors (especially red) very annoying, of which I do not explain the presence on such a decanted machine. I called Leica customer service, very kind and very helpful, who immediately put me in touch with a technical manager; at their request I sent DNG files to examine but the response was a bit disappointing... I didn't pretend they would admit something that doesn't exist but just the evidence since before contacting them I examined the same files with other people and a friend found the same problem on his M10. A machine that I do not recommend to the owners of the Leica M-P TYPE 240. 25 SEPTEMBER 2019 I RESUME THE POST... after long wait with the penultimate firmware update the machine no longer has those annoying points when opening the shadows and with Capture One they squeeze all the RAW information captured by the sensor and well stored. A sensor with high nominal sensitivity, probably between 400 and 800 ISOs; that's probably why they brought the minimum sensitivity to 200 ISOs. Now the machine is at its best in all respects. Having mastery of the medium and being able to focus only on the content..."is priceless"... ;-)))

Tre Mezzi

sent on March 20, 2017

Pros: Handling, dynamic range, sight, construction, improved ergonomics, iso ring

Cons: focus rectangle to focus a little bit

Opinion: Proven Saturday ... well I would say that Leica has fully optimized the philosophy of Wetzlar house, making all the improvements that need a modern instrument according to the instructions of the user, without distorting the traditional Leica. This M10 is ergonomic, tiny, very well built. sensor that makes excellent colors, combined with a level optics makes three-dimensional images as few cars can do. I do not see a defect in the weight (although contained), the lack of a swivel screen and the price. However, I sometimes had difficulty in precise focusing through the viewfinder, because the rectangle overlap is small. problem is resolved focheggiando in live view. Alongside in a hypothetical collection made from M8.2, Q, MD, M10.

Vincio85

sent on February 21, 2017

Pros: size, Viewfinder Optical x0.73, improved responsiveness 2Gb buffer, iso ring on the cap, simplified menu, three options of exposure meter, silent, minimalist and tropical conditions, iso impressed usable up to 12,500 color (black and white is another matter , and you can give vent to your creativity)

Cons: battery life, lower plate, lack pose T (only on M9)

Opinion: After six years of honorable service of my old Leica M9, ??and after trying and angry the next, I can finally say that the M10 is a worthy replacement for the M9.rnAvuta only in practice, the machine in hand raises an incredible emotion, in primarily because of its new design and its size, which even improved a few millimeters, handheld give the feeling of having an old analog Leica M. The weight instead although it is heavier than the M9 (currently the lightest digital M), curiously is well balanced, but not from that heavy feeling that gave the M240. The M10 is a collection of all the features of previous versions: Frames only white led (like the M262), LiveView (like the M240), no video (like M9 and M262 to maintain the minimalist spirit), buffer 2GB ( as the MP 240) ecc.rnTralasciando all technical data, i can say that after my trial i was particularly surprised by the yield of iso and the dynamic range of the color sensore.rnScattando i managed to push myself quietllamente, and without loss of detail, up to 12,500 ISO, maintaining a grain really nice and monocromatica.rnLe things that I did not like were: the absence of the pose T (present instead on my old M9, convenient to use filters lee, especially the big stopper), then the lower plate to be disassembled each time to access the battery compartment and sdcard; I personally believe that the removable bottom plate of a digital camera does not make sense to exist, and I think most intelligent and practical classic bottom flap. Another thing I did not like, the autonomy, which compared the M240 has taken a step back.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Leica » Leica M10 » All Opinions