JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Security, I FLE version, perfect as usual Leica. Absolute sharpness, blurred by fear, slow to use at full aperture. Used both on Leica M (typ 240) which is now on the Leica M9.
Cons:Not found
Opinion:I bought this lens after you have had for a while 'time the Summicron lens 8 (fantastic on M9). It was a choice dictated more by the possibility of having a lens to use and always say always, night and day both on Leica M9 and later. The vignetting that presents to TA is often a must and in any case is not a problem in the process of PP. It loses some 'charm Summicron f / 8 lens 2 but I do not regret moving to this 35mm.
Pros:size and weight in relation to openness and focal colors
Cons:vignetting wide open, front cover that is easily lost in the street (in the version asph. FLE not)
Opinion:I do not asph FLE version, gray in color. On sony a7r has a vignetting a bit 'over-the apertures, the rest is just great. rnHo goals sharper (type 55 sony fe F1.8 contends that the body with the leica 35), but every time I see a print made with a2 size 35 I do not think I could do it better. I do not know if it's a suggestion, but I'm so happy.
Pros:Sharpness at room temperature, transition plans, blurred, building, size and compactness.
Cons:Makes it seem all the remaining 35mm damn unrefined and rough.
Opinion:Benchmark between 35mm. Nothing more to say. Wonderful already at RT, extremely sharp and contrasted with a blurred that no other 35mm is able to return. Unfortunately addictive; after a while 'shots with 35mm king of everything else proves "weak" and inaccurate. It would indeed be the case, try to avoid if their finances (as in my case) they represent insurmountable barrier to the purchase of this view extraordinary.
Opinion:Optical extraordinary, among the best of invoice Leica ... incredible, TA seems to be f: 8 with an optical level ad Canon or Nikon. Yield blurred, three-dimensional and absolute clarity, steps out fire flame, from the center to the corners even at f: 1.4 does not, vignetting almost 0, fly high in short, is a masterpiece. rnDa prefer the current version FLE, floating elements, the first ASPH, the Olympus ASPHERICAL (2 aspherical lenses grinded by hand ...) and rare costoso.rnIl price seen as a "counter" is to assess the long-term where this kind of lenses do not lose value significantly, in fact, take in used very well.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
