JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:A good multiplier - in my opinion - at a reasonable price, to have those few mm available. in more than one focal that sometimes doesn't hurt. Canon's counterpart costs a bang, is more bulky and is not compatible with all Canon optics but only with some. This here, on the other hand, matches almost all optics with Canon EF and EF-S attachment (some EF-S optics are not compatible) without affecting its functionality, focus and optical rendering, also correctly transmitting all EXIF data. Wanting to find the hair in the egg I can only add that I found it slightly soft at full opening on the 70-200 f. 4 L IS-USM Canon at 200mm, but just close half a stop and the hair in the egg disappears. Wanting to better specify it I'm using it with satisfaction on the Canon 6D (F.F.) after using it without problems on the Canon 600D (Aps-c) also combined with the 70-300 f. 4-5.6 IS USM of Canon, at 50mm. macro f 2.5 and 24-105 L IS USM f. 4, and sometimes as well with the 28-105 IS USM, without finding any play in the grafts. The specimen in my possession I took it used for 70 degrees. by a friend who changed his system and who also had a great time.
Opinion:It is not compatible with the Nikon D3100 and D3200: They do not recognize it. It works well with the Nikon D5300 and the D7500, very well with the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1 lens. which loses brightness and switches to F4. With the Nikon 55-300 F 4.5-5.6 lens, it becomes f8 and very slow for sports photos. The quality decreases but is tolerable for photos with good light and not too much movement. Positive judgement for the modest price. Rated 7.
Cons:sharpness, image quality, chromatic aberrations, burnt lights (need to undergo a half stop), washed-out colors
Opinion:It is a multiplier to be bought for the price and for the sporadic necessity of having to multiply one's own goal. On the other hand there are many and all important: the quality of the images suffers a lot as I have indicated in the Cons. Personally I would prefer without a doubt the old Canon 1.4x II series not being able to buy the third series.
Cons:Several defects, both optical and compatibility
Opinion:I purchased the Teleconverter to be used on a SIGMA 50-500 OS lens, but at extreme focal points the exposure reading of my Canon EOS 7D MK ii went absolutely on tilt requiring 2 stops in less than openings. Moreover from a comparison made with and without multiplier I could see that it was better the file "croppato" without TC that the one not cropped with the TC installed: loss of very significant detail and a chromatic aberration fortissimo.rnrnA separate mention regarding the compatibility: rnrnSIGMA 50-500 OS = OKrnCANON 10-18 = it sends the machine into error (but it is also true that it makes no sense to mount a TC on a wide angle ....) rnCANON 24-105 IS L = up to 70 mm works , from then on send the machine in block (you have to remove the battery) rnYONGNUO 50 mm 1.8 = it works perfectly !! rnrn I returned it for obvious incompatibility ... rnrnA greetings to all
Cons:Some difficulties for the AF nell'agganciare the subject when used for small / fast subjects / with not optimal light.
Opinion:I already had in the past some converter Kenko and I always judge them positively, excellent value for money, almost absolute compatibility, relatively small image definition loss. I bought this because the "old" (so to speak ...) DGX result is not compatible with the Canon coupled 7DMarkII + Canon 100-400 f / 4.5-5.6 IS USM II.Confermo the positive impression even for this new HD, but if you use it for stationary subjects or so fast; Here I think it is even higher than the already excellent DGX, but if you want to use in "AI-Servo" chasing a bird, maybe small, shows its limits (but I think they are the limits of all the teleconverter, are still additional lens between the subject and the sensor ... but I have not tried the Canon, my opinion is therefore partial) .My opinion is generally positive, but for static subjects or slow moving or particularly neighbors and good light.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
