JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR)

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Sigmarco

sent on November 23, 2021

Pros: Construction, sharpness, internal zoom

Cons: Aperture, cost

Opinion: Excellent wide-angle lens, nothing to complain about. However, it has the flaw of the diaphragm "only" F4 that in some situations is limiting. It wouldn't be a big problem if it weren't a new nearly €1,000 optics. The yield is excellent, as the sharpness at least up to 18, then drops a hair but nothing striking. The construction is really good, no game, great materials, WR, very well done.

user63757

sent on August 29, 2021

Pros: Rings, mechanics, AF, stabilizer, sharpness, chromatic aberrations, filters, construction, WR gaskets.

Cons: Front writing can be annoying when using Photo Filters against written reflected light.

Opinion: Arrived yesterday made a series of tests. I must say the doubts about this perspective were many in the past I had more than one pair of the old 10-24 that I or criticized very hard variation qualitatively pairs and mechanics. The 10-24 WR Fuji designed for landscape photography where closing diaphragm I expect at f5.6 / f8.0 maximum yield even at the corners. I must say it does not disappoint at all or maybe or had luck to find a perfect couple. The tests that either made the sharpness really very impressive at focal length 10 mm but also at 24 mm where many criticize it I do not or found significant drop I would say perfect. On the old pairs of the 10-24 I had serious problems especially at focal length 24 mm the AF went crazy on the new seems perfect the AF tried manual bezel but perfect what I want sharp I find it excellent even on the infinity where with the old 10-24 was problematic ok they were all a can decentralized the pairs I had. Negative point I still find the writing in front on the optics can happen using backlight filters to find reflection of the writing I'm thinking of covering it with some black tape. Personally I make this observation the optics not at brightness f2.8 so not for astro photography indicated low brightness and I also say not for reportage photography better a fixed lens. Very personal or read on some forum Fuji I do not know what Fuji to fact same construction lenses as on the old 10-24 but it seems different more contrast and sharpness I also put myself with this consideration I do not know but perhaps a small improvement in lens treatments. For me one of the best lenses ever from Fuji super sharpness even at the angles at the level of the zoom pro f2.8. Note: at 10 mm slightly wider angle wider field than the old 10-24 Fuji but perhaps only the reason to Capture One not updated to the latest version so lack of lens profile. Not a cheap optics my couple anyway bought used but at least my couple really perfect and I'm over-happy. The 10-24 WR is better than the 8-16 for what concerns flare side light. On closer distances you can see that different behavior is better on long distances a landscape lens, or also found slight advantages on long distances compared to the zoom 16-55. Another observation the 10-24 WR reaches maximum quality at long distances with closed apertures or noticed according to the focal length even more external corners sometimes soft closing at f8.0 disappears completely. It can no longer be missing in my 10-24 WR backpack when I do landscape photography together with my new 70-300 + Fuji X-T4 really incredibly excellent and super stabilized when needed.

BlueFlamingo

sent on August 23, 2021

Pros: Very versatile lens in the landscape photos for which it was born, which thanks to the 24 focal length avoids having to change the lens for some possible street shot, right weight, tropicalization even if not impeccable.

Cons: Many of the defects of the previous series have remained, the shot must be calibrated very well especially if there are geometric subjects or people near the edges. The lens widens a lot on the final part, so the lens hood is very bulky.

Opinion: A lens created for landscape photos, an excellent travel companion or excursion. With the focal length at 24 it allows you to also take some street photos even if for this there are much more suitable lenses, and also venture some portraits on the fly without changing the lens, something that would not be done with fixed wide angles. Obviously the results are not Pulitzer Prize. The lens unfortunately maintains many defects of the old, the distortion at the edges especially at 10 mm there is, in the landscape photo you do not notice much, but if there are people near the edges you have to calibrate the photo well, be careful not to tilt the camera too much up or down, let's say it is not a foolproof bomb, but it allows you to do many things with a single lens, which does not allow the 8-16, too specific ... In the street you can play a bit to make some nice effects, but always calibrating the distortion, which however is reduced to longer focal lengths. The maximum aperture is fixed at f4.0, the thing does a lot PRO, but I did not quite understand the advantage where it is ... having had an f2.8 at 10 mm would have allowed you to take pictures even to the stars. However, I repeat, for excursions it is excellent, the tropicalization works very well on the whole lens body, a bit of doubt leaves me on the area of contact with the camera body, I have an XT3 so tropicalized too, but I happened to find myself under an unexpected summer rain, which lasted a few minutes but it splashed a lot ... I dried it externally but after 1 hour there was condensation on the sensor, nothing inside the lenses, but on the sensor yes, disassembled the lens was damp the contact edge between body and lens, it had never happened to me with the 100-400. Excellent rings, very precise, fast autofocus, in general it is a good lens, although I did not fall in love with it lost... I also take various photos inside, but you have to be very careful what you do for distortion. is it the best lens for fuji? NO But it is a lens that I would call hybrid between a wide angle and a handyman. Its best it gives in the landscapes, but it allows you to start from home with a single lens, something that you would not do with a fixed 10 or 12, nor with an 8-16. Weight ok, similar to the 18-55, size a hair larger. It has that shape that widens at the end, so even the hood becomes quite bulky, and mounted on the contrary is horrendous. I to put it in the neoprene case I have to disassemble it, which I do not do with 18-55 ... result that always leaves them in the backpack apart when you just can not do without it ...

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Fujifilm » Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR » All Opinions