JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Diaphragms that force you to use ISO cars recklessly
Opinion:Used as a forklift for 10 days waiting for another lens. I was surprised at the lightness and optical hike. Also shot the interior with ISO up to 6400 with RP, the results were good. For outdoor shots it shows its true value, excellent colors and details. An optics to keep as a reserve of the L series, or on trips to unpleasant places.
Pros:Versatility, good image quality to be a 10x. makes it better in canvases than in wide-angle. acceptable size and weight.
Cons:lack of the standard lampshade. On a cost of 1000 euros we could put that piece of plastic of the lampshade , it is not made of gold!
Opinion:Taken from a couple of days and tried on the fly with mundane photos just to compare it with RF 24-105. I must say that I expected worse for a 10x , in direct comparison with RF 24-105 loses quality at the edges in the focal courts, but not dramatic. Very good yield to the long focal points, compared with the EF 70-200 f4 is last series holds him almost head. the problem is that you have to use the new digital photo professional of canon because at the moment the raw files on raw camera are not correct , you can use but for example at 24mm you see at the corners angry the edges of the lens. in Practice shows a photo more than 24mm than the same in jpeg. More information will follow in the field. But it's crazy to go out with the only car around your neck with a lens that does pretty much everything, leaving the heavy duffel bag at home. It's only been a few days and the raw camera update has arrived, I say right away that it's a strange thing, applying the lens data corrects well and the black corners disappear, but giving the correction 100% on the distortion that makes the photo change a lot, but straightens the lines to perfection. With other 24 mm lenses you do not see the black corners even without applying the correction. Boh...... However, I confirm the decent overall quality. He loses a bit of sharpness at the edges in the focal courts, but I'm a good judge. Going around without the heavy duffel bag pleases me and I think in the end that if you don't have to do professional photos for advertising can go well. Ps tried at a wedding for the outside....... Never had so much fun! Great result!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
