JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:AF system, multiple improvements to the previous model.
Cons:Missing: the dual pixel raw and the pixel shift in camera (present on the R5 mk I). There is no spot metering linked to the focus point. Menu more articulated than usual, compared to Canon's standard reference. There is no GPS.
Opinion:Video sector not evaluated, the prevalent use is in the photographic field. The autofocus system has been significantly improved and now takes advantage of the new algorithms, recently implemented in the eos system; among other things, there is now gaze-controlled focusing, as on the R3 and, recently, on the R1. The viewfinder is larger and brighter than before. The shutter now goes up to 1/32000. The burst has been increased and the pre-shot is present. Customization is now at the highest levels, thanks to the updating and further expansion of functions, albeit at the expense of a considerable articulation of the items on the menu. In general, the camera is more responsive than its predecessor and seems to handle noise better at high ISO (I reserve the right to test it better and more thoroughly, because these are only the initial impressions). Don't value new in-room development features, such as upscaling. I would have liked the expository reading related to the point of focus. The same goes for the dual pixel raw, which had made its appearance on the 5D mark IV and which had been developed and improved, further, on the R5. And, still on the subject, although it was not a function that I used that much, it lacks the pixel shift (IBIS) that had been added via firmware, lately, to the R5. To conclude, it could be said that, now, we have a "mature" and better version of the R5 in toto, similar to what happened with the transition from the R6 to the R6 mark II.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
