JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Coupling to lock sliding lens, lens hood lack, brightness
Opinion:Goal that use 90% on my 70D, I find "honest" about the quality of the photos. It 'a handyman, so normal that there are trade-offs with respect to objectives gamma.rnApprezzo very top of the stabilizer that performs its function effectively even at maximum brightness estensione.rnrnSul front, pay a bit' in low light conditions and on focal thrusts, forcing you to compensate by increasing ISO or shutter speed. rnrnIl mechanism focal elongation is very soft and with the machine shoulder rest position stretches alone; This has obliged to add a lock button which is very uncomfortable. I think as Canon could have done more, especially in comparison to another lens that I use, the Tamron 70-300, where the extension system is very focal migliore.rnrnPer finish, but it's a classic for IS lenses, missing hood and I think this is a gap that should be colmato.rn
Cons:It 'a handyman, so you know in advance what is to be expected.
Opinion:Bought new 350 € with a Canon lens hood is not, I must say that he pulled out of the picture too beautiful for me was not just a paperweight as many claim ... resold to 350 € after 6 months to pass the 70-200 F /4...Se you need a lens to travel in my opinion is not male.rnLa focus is not slow to be that it is not the IS USM and does his duty. Comodo blocking the minimum focal.
Pros:wide focal length range, excellent IS, quiet and fast AF
Cons:no hood
Opinion:used in two moments of 60D; shots and mounted filmati.rnObiettivo to leave forever! covers focal lengths are used for travel and reportage photo that is always up and video.rnAF IS sorprendente.rnCon Magic Lanter v2.3 (firmware for Canon EOS) can effectively compensate colorimetry optics, making it almost an "L "rnInoltre a TA you can get a decent depth from 18mm.rnHo also noted that the polarizer enhances the detail.
Pros:remarkable focal range, sharpness in the center at all focal lengths, construction, reliability and speed AF, great stabilizer
Cons:weight, distortion at 18mm, nothing provided
Opinion:I l 'I bought used at 230 € and I have to say that for that amount it I was extremely pleased! RnIntendiamoci, is a superzoom, so ideal for quick photos, holidays with the family, but at the same time can also be used for something more creative, given that 'such a wide focal length range allows you to get good at fuzzy focal massime.rnLa image quality in my opinion is very good, I zoomed in images is often in both 18 mm to 200 mm and I noticed an unexpected sharpness, especially in the center, obvious that close to 18 mm better than one stop, as well as 200, for best results, but even at full aperture the guy knows how to tell her, of course, compared with other kit zoom or super zoom! RNLA optical stabilization is nothing short of amazing, I took pictures at 200m (320mm equivalent) freehand to 1/50 and came sharp! GNI 'AF is fast and quiet, despite being of the older generation do not silenziosa.rnI colors are good, as well as the contrast foto.rnI difects of this superzoom are the main weight (my poor reflex always travels with his head down), the lack of equipment (hood and housing in particular), the distortion generated at 18 mm, and the low light (although 5.6 200 mm is not bad considering that the kit has the same dark at 55mm) rnrnLo used to recommend 250/300 €, a new € 400 seems a bit 'Tantini with 500 € you will find some good used 70 200 2.8 and if I were to invest the kind of money I would invest on those ...
user47418
sent on June 19, 2014
Pros:Extended zoom range, good optical performance, versatility, good AF and excellent stabilizer, good construction and compactness, reliability.
Cons:Distortion at wide angles, lens hood is not provided.
Opinion:Purchased zooming in question for its versatility, compactness and maneuverability, noticed its qualitative limits due to considerable zoom range, I have improved its optical performance by increasing, through the menu 'Camera, sharpness and contrast, thereby obtaining a visible image enhancement.
Pros:Is used at a good price, versatile, and very fast AF d fairly quiet and stabilization makes it very well.
Cons:Little precision focus, size, and filters very expensive.
Opinion:It was my first lens and I have to say that very good results, as slow travel and very good and versatile ago panoramas modest 200mm and 200mm zoom.A good enough to be good advice as optical sfocati.O portraits and travel far versatile.rnIo use it on a canon eos 450d and I have to say that many times is a bit 'heavy if you are behind but does not compromise versatility, also as I said the AF compared to 18-55 and very fast and rather quiet. rnSpero my review will be of help.
Pros:accessible as price, lightweight, onesto.soprattutto not you feel faint.
Cons:dim
Opinion:Convenient for travel, I can not find, for my needs, defects, chromatic aberration, and clarity of the image. Consiglio.Esiste I definitely better, but at what price! On the other hand when you travel is ideal. Great, for me, in portraits, landscapes where I see no valid aberrations sorta.Personalmente I find it a good choice.
Cons:Image quality low, blunt, non-illuminated, AC, not too balanced, lens hood not included
Opinion:I have had several occasions to try this super zoom because, going on vacation with a friend who owns it, I wanted to evaluate its performance in different situations scatto.rnIniziamo to say that the only advantage I found in use is the range focal length: have a perspective that goes from 18 to 200 in just is like a blast from the past the compact! I think it can be defined very general perspective for those who have no particular interest (not a true wide nor a true tele) for people who are out to photograph without a subject, and without wanting to bring with you to change lenses. At the end I can say that the image quality is decent from f / 8 to f/11, for a superzoom was not expecting much altro.rnIn conclusion the only reason why I could never use is to have a view with which do site inspections and ideas of photographs from then revise and redo with best optical performance and more!
Cons:chromatic aberration and distortion in the corners, a little light, lens hood is not standard
Opinion:The Canon 18-200 is a focal interesting perspective that goes from wide to telephoto with a round of nut. It 'a lightweight but not very bright to get the most you have to close some of the aperture stop. If the center of the image is good, the corners are noticed chromatic aberration and distortion. The IS is good and can compensate 2-3 stop vibrations. The hood is not sold as standard. In conclusion, I can say that it is an honest superzoom travel very versatile.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
